similar to: Sip Issue

I just got a grandstream SIP phone Here is my sip.conf for the phone [mlh] type=friend insecure=yes username=mlh secret=mlh host=dynamic canreinvite=no The phone as the default config on it. If I use the phone to call a Zap interface (a tdm card) the voice sounds all choppy. If I use the phone to call a x100p card, it does not dial what I dial (no DTMF) I don't know

I just checkout the cvs code for asterisk...... when I use my grandstream phone (that worked on the old code that was about 2 months old) I do not hear anything at all... I get this error: Sep 27 23:20:27 WARNING[1142127920]: File chan_sip.c, Line 444 (retrans_pkt): Maximum retries exceeded on call 0765c89e-9d67-3c0a-b9b9-2e7f3cd1d9ef@192.168.50.248 for seqno 58430 (Response) here is my

Full_Name: Yves Rosseel Version: 2.2.1 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (157.193.116.152) The code below sketches a possible implementation of a function 'mlh.mlm' which I think would be a good complement to the 'anova.mlm' function in the stats package. It tests a single linear hypothesis of the form H_0: LBT'= 0 where B is the matrix of regression coefficients; L is a matrix

Signed-off-by: Simon COURTOIS <scourtois at linagora.com> --- src/app/controllers/vm_controller.rb | 16 ++++++++++++++ src/app/views/vm/edit_vmpool.rhtml | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/app/views/vm/show.rhtml | 3 ++ src/public/images/icon_vmpool_11px.png | Bin 0 -> 542 bytes 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Hi R-users I'm trying to do multivariate analysis of variance of a experiment with 3 treatments, 2 variables and 5 replicates. The procedure adopted in SAS is as follow, but I'm having difficulty in to implement the contrasts for comparison of all treatments in R. I have already read manuals and other materials about manova in R, but nothing about specific contrasts were found in them,

With a single server, settings "security = server" and "password server = pdc1 pdc2', I can successfully authenticate against two entirely different PDCs depending on which order I put the two machines in the 'password server' list. Is there someway of forcing clients from either domain to authenticate against the 'right' pdc, regardless of the order in the

Setup: Server: Mac OS X Server which serves dhcp and tftp requests client: Acer with PXE boot agent 4.0.19 file to transfer: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10988 Apr 12 13:50 pxelinux.0 The default tftpd daemon doesn't support the tsize option (I think, look at the packet trace at the end, it reports the file isn't found, but I think this is because of tsize ... but I could be

Just so that it gets into the archives for future googlers: If you get 'system error 64' on a windows xp machine trying to connect to samba, then make sure you have nothing running on port 445. I had an apache ssl instance running on that port. Doh! Had to scratch my head a bit over it. XP doesn't actually need anything to be on 445, it just gets confused and gives up if there is.

All, I wrote a port of rsync to c# / .net. If there is interest in this, I'd be happy to make the code available. The current code will send synchronize with a linux rsync server, and can run in daemon mode on windows (I've made even a windows service wrapper for it). It's far from clean, and far from perfect, but it works and can be a good starting point. Please let me know,

Signed-off-by: Simon COURTOIS <scourtois at linagora.com> --- src/app/controllers/vm_controller.rb | 16 +++++++++++++ src/app/views/vm/edit_vmpool.rhtml | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/app/views/vm/show.rhtml | 3 ++ src/public/images/icon_vmpool_11px.png | Bin 0 -> 542 bytes 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644

I posted a question earlier (below) regarding two instances of samba on the same machine. Unfortuneately my question only elicited questions. Can anyone tell me whether samba locks and Unix locks pay well together? Will samba notice unix locks aaaaand vice versa? I _did_ look at the documentation but I think it was very out of date. (e.g. UNIX-SMB.txt in samba 2.2.3 says that "Unix has

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

Does anyone know whether the linux machine running * have to have a sound card on it in order for musiconhold to work for sip phones? I've tried about everything (including tons of google searching) to get it to work, and nothing. When a call is placed on hold between two C7960's, the CLI indicates: -- Executing Dial("SIP/3002-c418", "SIP/3000|20") in new stack

Hi , I need to do my user_windows "eng.processo" to acess my unix solaris 2.x as user_unix "cs02929". As like indicate, I create in "global" of file "smb.conf" the command: username map = /etc/smbusers and into the file /etc/smbuser, the command: cs02929 = "eng.processo". This it don?t work. Please, what do I do to this work? Do I forgot

Your message for list seminar has been rejected. The message is thus sent back to you. Your message : Received: from utia.cas.cz (218-170-65-79.dynamic.hinet.net [218.170.65.79]) by visla.utia.cas.cz (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0N1HnuH004937 for <seminar@utia.cas.cz>; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:17:51 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200501230117.j0N1HnuH004937@visla.utia.cas.cz> From:

A few days ago, John Pierce made a comment about Intel network cards and that they are more reliable and a better overall card than most. (This is not exactly what he said, but rather I am paraphrasing) My small cluster of servers all had generic PCI nics in them (I was not using any onboard NICS). Today, I replaced the NICS with Intel Pro 1000 PCI-E NICS and replaces our small 5 port TP-Link GB

For some reason, I can't get call pickup to work between Sip phones or between Sip and Zap phones. All phones are in the same call group and pickup group (1). The source code was downloaded and built as of today 11/15/03. Here's what's in sip.conf: [general] port=5060 bindaddr=192.168.17.2 tos=lowdelay disallow=all allow=ulaw context=aliens ; ; SIP Entry for sipura line 1 ; This

Hello, I own a PCI-Express parallel card installed on my server Fujitsu TX100 S2. I am running CentOS 6 x64. In Kernel version 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64, it was correctly detected as: [root at Carmen ~]# lspci -vvv -s 05:00.2 05:00.2 Parallel controller: NetMos Technology Device 9912 (prog-if 03 [IEEE1284]) Subsystem: Device a000:2000 Physical Slot: 4 Control: I/O+ Mem+

Hi all, I have C6 i386 with cr repo enabled; problem is, I can't get x-forwarding to work, xorg-x11-auth rpm is installed, have checked sshd config for #X11Forwarding no X11Forwarding yes #X11DisplayOffset 10 Here is a verbose ssh logon, I can't see any difference to a working server: debug1: Authentication succeeded (password). debug1: channel 0: new [client-session] debug3:

Hello list. Today I saw something strange in logs one of my servers. Part of the /var/log/security: Mar 12 15:01:03 server sshd[28505]: Invalid user abc from ::ffff:x.x.x.x Mar 12 15:01:03 server sshd[28503]: Invalid user ab from ::ffff:x.x.x.x Mar 12 15:01:03 server sshd[28507]: Invalid user abcd from ::ffff:x.x.x.x Mar 12 15:01:03 server sshd[28509]: Invalid user abcde from ::ffff:x.x.x.x Mar