similar to: per virtual pbx VM storage

This is not specifically on-topic for Asterisk, but I have found on many occasions while working with Asterisk that it would have been very handy to be able to measure, with some precision, the bandwidth being used by a particular host, port, or combination of the two. So, I went searching for various tools, none of which were what I wanted. They either were too clever, or too limited in

A friend pointed out this url http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/clmn32.htm where it lists intercom/auto-answer as being a feature in Cisco Call Manager (which as I understand it, uses SIP predominately for handsets). I've come across comment somewhere that intercom isn't supported in the SIP spec. Does anyone know if the apparent capability of Intercom being available in SIP

I'm having great success using Cisco 7960s with Asterisk but one Cisco 7960 specific function that's puzzling me is programming the 'line buttons' (6 buttons on the upper right side of the phone) for speed dial. I'm not using any Cisco applications like Call Manager and the phones are SIP. *All* of the documentation I've found over the last several days continues to refer

I've got a problem that keeps popping up with my reception phone. It is a IP 650 and the receptionist - on three occassions - has accidentally hit the "Forward" softkey just before she enters the "Page All" keystrokes and then all future calls get routed as an overhead page. I will admit, the first time it happened, I was totally stumped. Why the heck did I have

Hi, I have received some replies for my previous mail (* configuration), asking for my goals in configuring Asterisk. So here they are: We are planning to host an Inter continental virtual PBX service that will enable our users to register for an account which give them a toll-free # or a DID. Once registered using a web based interface, that user can add as manay extensions he/she wants

any way the you can get * to send a NOTIFY SIP message to all SIP phones? to have the SIP sets recheck thier configs etc?? Like this? NOTIFY sip:sip@192.168.0.3:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ipaddress:5060;branch=1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ipaddress From: <sip:webadim@192.168.0.1> To: <sip:sip@192.168.0.3> Event: check-sync Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:28:53 -0700 Call-ID: test@192.168.0.1

Le Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:17:41PM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner écrivait/wrote: > > Here is the schedule: > > May 7th - Release branch created. Developers should begin reviewing > all documentation. > > May 14th - Tar balls and binaries are released for general testing. I'll > also need volunteers to create additional llvm-gcc binaries that I have > not provided.

Hello All, On a Debian/AMD64 host I am surprised that there is apparently no way to generate position independent code in shared object (i.e. to output files which are easy dlopen-able without pain)? I probably missed something obvious, but what? I want to compile LLVM assembly source code -suitably generated- into .so as directly as possible... Regards -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH

Hello (my machine is a Debian/Sid/x86-64/Core2) Assuming I have one C source file chello.c, to compile it into a dynamically loadable thru dlopen shared object, I can run gcc -fPIC -shared -O chello.c -o chello.so I thought that, assuming I have one llvm source ehello.ll, the equivalent would be llvmc2 -opt ehello.ll -o ehello.so but it is not that simple. Any clues ? May I also

Hello everybody I don't understand how I'm supposed to use svydesign caracteristics to explain to R that my sampling design is the following one Data base = tab1 here are the five first rows of the database (nrow = 11792) num esp Quarters Totcat Totshp Totgt Tbtpos fpc1 Totanim Id_An 10 2045 G

Thank you for this reply. If so, is there any way to merge basic blocks into a single one? Thanks, Seung J. Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:27:38 +0200 >From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch.net> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM assembly without basic block >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Seung

Hello All Does any know about some opensource multithread-compatible (or concurrent) garbage collector library, if possible suitable for LLVM? (I mean that I want several mutator threads; the collector can be stoptheworld or concurrent ....) H.Boehm's conservative GC is multithread compatible, but seems quite slow (allocation is about the time of a C malloc). And it is well known that

Dear All, I downloaded the latest CVS of llvm I want to try to use LLVM only for JIT only use (generating code in memory for x86 and, when available PowerPC [32bits]) How do I ./configure to avoid being asked about llvmgcc, which, in my very partial understanding, is only used to parse C code... If I understand correctly what Chris Lattner emailed me, LLVM uses only GCC frontend for C & C++

http://sipp.sourceforge.net/ Anyone care to throw this at Asterisk to see what happens? I would, but I am having significant temporal shortfalls recently due to the apparent warping of the space/time continuum when I answer the phone with clients/associates. It seems that entire days pass by before I hang up... very odd, and very counter-productive to getting good Asterisk work done. JT

Hello All, What version of g++ is usable to compile the latest LLVM CVS snapshot on a Linux/x86-64 (AMD64) Debian/ Sid or Etch plateform? What compiler do LLVM dzevelopers use to compile LLVM on Linux/X86-64 systems? IKt seems that most versions of g++ fail to compile LLVM and that some others compile it wrongly (producing buggy code)? Why can't g++-4.1 be used? FWIW, the latest gcc

I've been developing a package called foobar for a couple of years now. It has evolved through various versions, but has always contained compiled C code. Recently, R CMD check has started generating the following message [START QUOTE] R CMD check foobar_1.7.5.tar.gz * using log directory ?/home/david/foobar/package/foobar.Rcheck? * using R version 2.15.2 (2012-10-26) * using platform:

Hi, We have a mail server with multiple instances of Postfix each listening on a different IP address to create a set of virtual mail servers. There are various reasons why separate instances of Postfix seems to work best to achieve this goal, but I wont divert into that discussion here. I would like so match this with Dovecot. The listening side isn't a problem as Dovecot can listen on

Thank you for reminding me the notion of the basic block. Of course, I know all the assembly takes the form of BBs and is divided into units of BB. OK. It looks better for me to explain what I wanted to do more clear from the first. Actually, I am working on emitting out an assembly of VM by using LLVM. LLVM assembly looks similar with this VM assembly except BB. The VM assembly does not have the

hi. base from the cookbook example, where each categories can have many recipes, id like the categories to have multiple sub categories, unlimited levels. please show some code, as i am new to Ruby and Ruby On Rails. thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Le Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:36:22AM -0700, Chris Lattner écrivait/wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2007, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > > > > > FWIW, the latest gcc snapshot from yesterday gcc version 4.3.0 20070501 > > (experimental) fail to compile latest LLVM (with compile errors!). > > Please file an llvm bug report with these errors. It may be that we are > doing