similar to: FW: HDLC & T100P

I'm setting up a T1 for both voice and data and was wanting to know the steps involved. I've recompiled zaptel for ZAPATA_NET support and setup my /etc/zaptel.conf: Fxsks=1-10 Nethdlc=11-24 Modprobe wct1xxp works fine and my voice lines work. Now when I use the provided sethdlc, I use the following commands: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 <ipaddress> <network>

Hello All, I am battling a problem I don't know how to fix... Here is the scenario: Fractionated T1 with 1-6 channels voice, 21-24 channels data. Comes into a box with Digium T100P, splits off data channes with HDLC, to devicec pvc0, This works fine, but I have a routing problem getting to my machines! Here is the current set up... sethdlc hdlc0 fr lmi ansi sethdlc hdlc0 create 44

All, I am trying to configure hdlc support on T100P Digium card - everything seems ok... but it just does not work at all. I was able to compile all drivers, the light on the card becomes green when I plug T1 link.... but I even can't ping default router IP... there is no data coming back to me, so I am confused completely now. Also I tried both protocols - raw hdlc and cisco hdlc. The

hi below is sysvinit script for handling tcng-script .... please excuse my bad bash skils, correct me where i''m doing stupid things :") what is left... many things, if i have time i will implement them too : - start [devices] - and then correct handling of service lock files i.e. per device lock file - stats blah ... - all ideas are welcome !! - test or some such, i mean the

Hello everyone, We have recently turned up a new T1 from McLeod (Midwestern CLEC). It is configured like so: /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone=us defaultzone=us span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs ;(also tried 1,1,0,esf,b8zs) bchan=13-23 nethdlc=1-12 dchan=24 /etc/zapata.conf: switchtype=national context=pri-in signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channel => 13-23 I can get hdlc0 (and pvc0) up just fine after the

my target is to produce a linux router with T100p to Fract T1 24chan to ethernet and TDM 4channel FXO. I have not been able to get nethdlc to work, just get zaptel networking not configured if I set bchan and dchan the card comes to life, but I don't believe this is correct for what I want to accomplish. according to markster@ this is the way they do it. using (multiple distro versions

All, I'm having a heck of a time getting hdlc to work on kernel 2.6.11.9 .. I compiled hdlc, hdlc_gen, hdlc_cisco, hdlc_raw, into the kernel (note into, and not 'modules'). System comes up, I configured zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-24 modprobe wct4xxp ztcfg sethdlc hdlc0 cisco ifconfig hdlc0 up All of this works fine, believe it or not. I have a T1 cross plugged

Hello all, We have a TE405P set up with span 1 running to a channel bank, a PRI running into span 2, and a PPP internet T1 running into span 3. We have the first 2 spans up and running without a problem. We have hdlc compiled into the kernel and after making the appropriate changes to zaptel.conf and loading the zaptel, wct4xxp, and hldc modules we can bring up the third span with the internet

Hello all, My set up is a fractionated t1, with 1-6 voice channels, 21-24 data channels. I have a t100P installed in a amd 1500 with 512meg. Question: In order to set up the data channels, is the following correct? 1) compile new kernel with generic hdlc support 2) compile hdlc from hq.pm.waw.pl/hdlc 3) uncomment KFLAGS+=DConfig_ZAPATA_NET in zaptel makefile 4) compile zaptel, 5 compile rest

I have my Linux 2.6 kernel with the necessary HDLC config and also recompiled zaptel accordingly. On modprobe, I get: Found a Wildcard: Digium Wildcard T100P T1/PRI Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2000 in_atomic():0[expected: 0], irqs_disabled():1 [<0211e605>] __might_sleep+0x82/0x8c [<02144643>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d/0x57 [<42ad7a2c>]

Hello all, I tried these commands (taken from lartc HOWTO). #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 root handle 1: prio #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 parent 1:3 handle 30: sfq When I try to watch at the qdisc statistics with the command: #tc -s qdisc ls dev pvc0 I have this response: qdisc sfq 30: quantum 1516b

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

I am attempting to deploy a TE210P with one port configured (all 24 channels) as Cisco HDLC, currently running 2.6.11 FC4 with HDLC module compiled. HDLC (RAW) appears to work fine, however, using Cisco HDLC (via sethdlc & sethdlc-new) results in no traffic being encapsulated or transmitted via the hdlc0 interface. Is there anybody here currently running a similar configuration on a

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

There are two Linux routers, a 64K leased line is used to connect these two machines. Now, we would like to run Voice over IP between two machines. We have to run QoS and tag voice packet''s TOS field, otherwise, the voice quality is terrible if we transfer file and make voice call at the same time. I am not familiar with tc in Linux. But I have copied a script from LARTC archives. If

dev seems to be slow to respond, so maybe someone here has accomplished this... I''m trying to bridge an hdlc0 interface to a guest, but I believe the network-scripts only support eth* devices. Any clue on how to get my hdlc0 p-t-p link interface bridged? Any tap suggestions/syntax? Simply adding hdlc0 with brctl is incorrect syntax. Thanks in advance. -Cody Tubbs Systems Analyst

Can anyone recommend who we can consult with that could provide advice on the legality of a proposed VoIP service. Specifically, we would provide VoIP termination in the USA to clients in Spain, Nigeria and Guana. The termination service would connect the VoIP clients to the PSTN through a carrier like MCI, Verizon, etc. The calls placed would connect anywhere in the world via the USA carrier.

Hi all, I have a user who would like to stream their favorite radio station from iHeart radio for their music on hold. It this TECHNICALLY possible? If so, any pointers would be appreciated. Is this LEGAL in the US? Thanks in advance, Mike. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I have two identical linux boxes (A e B), each one with two interfaces: an ethernet (eth0 with ip 192.168.1.50) and an hdlc (hdlc0). The two boxes are only connected via a link through their hdlc interfaces. Because they have to be exactly the same, if I have to assign an ip address to hdlc0 of A then the hdlc0 of B should have the same ip address. Each one should have a default