similar to: No subject

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "No subject"

2018 Dec 06
2
Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
Hi, It looks like the upgrade to CentOS 7.6 has been unusually disruptive with the GNOME desktop version bump and a series of moving targets under the hood. The result is some wreckage at my client's desktop installations, which I've been busy to repair since yesterday. First things first. I have a custom configuration of GDM, which consists mainly of two things. 1. Display my
2010 Sep 22
2
Anyone please make Wine permissive?
Sir, I am rishikeshan. I am a 14 years old student. I am interested in permissive open community. I hate copyleft. Don't fear of commercialization. It is needed to the earth. Actually, GPL is blocking the development. I will definitely help you if you make it permissive. Maybe you can make YOUR code permissive. How permissive nature help you? How can I get old BSD release? 1.Some commercial
2023 Nov 15
1
understanding stat cache
Hello Ralph, Thanks for that hint about case sensitivity's performance penalty. For clarifaction: The user is doing mainly reads, so does the "create" you mention also cover opening/reading files? If only _creation_ of files is suffering from that we probably have some other/further performance issue. We have gpfs, which does not offer a case-insensitive mode, neither does the
2016 May 06
0
OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
On Fri, May 6, 2016 4:19 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the >>> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 >>> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said
2018 Dec 06
0
Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Now with CentOS 7.6 this doesn't work anymore. The /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d > directory is nowhere to be found, and I'm currently mildly cursing the > GNOME developers' (and Red Hat's) policy of releasing moving targets. > Until now, the whole purpose of Enterprise Linux seemed to be low-risk > updates.
2005 Feb 05
1
Why Windows sucks.
The most eloquant rant on Windows I've read for a long long time.... http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2005/02/04/notes020405.DTL
2007 May 13
0
No subject
charge, but instead will be raised a few seconds before the power will be cut by the UPS, either because of a low battery event or a user initiated shutdown (with delay) command. The thing I don't like about that, is that by that time the shutdown sequence has apparently already started by the UPS, which means that we have no control over when the power will be cut. Also, if it indeed only
2018 Dec 06
2
Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Now with CentOS 7.6 this doesn't work anymore. The /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d >> directory is nowhere to be found, and I'm currently mildly cursing the >> GNOME developers' (and Red Hat's) policy of releasing moving targets. >> Until now, the whole purpose of
2001 Jan 23
0
configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH
I get the "language optional software package not installed" bit, that just means you didn't buy Sun's C compiler. I'm not sure why configure would complain about not being able to find gcc in your $PATH, since at what appears to be the next prompt, you "found" gcc. I did find an override provision in the configure that came with Samba 2.0.6--you can set an
2011 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR
On Oct 4, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 October 2011 00:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> 1. The native client folks trying to use LLVM IR as a portable representation that abstracts arbitrary C calling conventions. This doesn't work because the frontend has to know the C calling conventions of the target. > (...) >> 2. The OpenCL folks
2011 May 06
7
Background music during a call
Hi All, I am in desperate need of this feature. I want to play background music during a call while the 2 parties are having some lovely conversation (or maybe give them a sort of cursing background if they are cursing each other). I found this post which talks about creating a ghost call with the help of queues and putting that queue in a meetme room where queue will play the song/curse and the
2013 Nov 07
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On 6 Nov 2013, at 19:23, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > BUT, right now working off a release is painful because of the > integration cost of upgrading to a new release. APIs totally change, > new bugs have to be tracked down, performance regressions fixed, etc. > Integrating our changes is a lot of work but it's not the only hard > part. Dealing with
2015 Apr 27
0
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > >> >> No, you posted some ranting misconceptions about why you don't see a >> need for it. But if you actually believed any of that yourself, then >> you would see there was no harm in adding a dual license to make it >> clear to everyone else. It
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
I got one email from eric asked me to Lower the rxgain and txgain on your Zap channels. But actually it is already the voice volume is low and I was looking to increase the gain (currently it is 0.0), so I do not know if eric was mean to reduce it less than 0.0, but I can not do that due to the low volume that is already existed, so any more reduce will make the voice not hearable well, even if
2016 Sep 28
0
Good Bye SAMBA?!?!?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Steve Ankeny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 09/28/2016 06:43 AM, Jonathan Hunter via samba wrote: >> >> On 28 September 2016 at 11:07, Sven Schwedas via samba >> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>> Okay, can we ban the troll already? >> >> OK, here's a devil's advocate
2007 Jun 11
0
swfdec-mozilla: Changes to 'refs/tags/0.4.5'
Tag '0.4.5' created by Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> at 2007-06-11 16:24 -0700 release 0.4.5 ("Who's Jack?") -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGbWlgvMv5VCdLq8QRAswQAKCNqJpCdcVNJAyCrh2zRTBGeQPz1ACfSArR jbwb8WDs8p4ukODRP4vhEvs= =2q8J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Changes since 0.4.4: Benjamin Otte: back to mdevelopment
2016 May 06
2
OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the >> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 >> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and >> rebooted the system. >> >> And the stupid
2001 Feb 12
3
That darned orphaned socket hang
Stephen, OK, I can now reproduce this hang at will, purely by pulling the plug on my desktop when logged in and then rebooting - its a gnome desktop box with few partitions and ext3 on all of them, so I guess its getting a pile of gnome or ssh related sockets kept in /tmp which is on root To recap, when the machine is suffering from this, it hangs at the point of mounting the root filesystem
2018 Oct 19
1
What are the differences between systemd and non-systemd Linux distros?
*** This response is my personal opinion and may not reflect that of my employer. *** >> people are tired of screaming and yelling about systemd, because we've >> had years now of the response being "tough, it's the Wave of the >> Future" > >We covered that back when RHEL 7 was still in beta: the time is far too late to change the init system of RHEL
2003 Apr 19
1
Re: RV: Re: My 1st BW Manager
Original Message: ----------------- From: Stef Coene stef.coene@docum.org On Saturday 19 April 2003 12:10, GoMi wrote: >> Stef, if you are interested in working around this problem, maybe we >could >> meet in a chat room, and you can login to my box and see what happens, >> interested? >Yes, but not now. But I can check it out myself. >How do this DAP works? Do they