similar to: Any comments on ietf secsh draft?

On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 03:16, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 07:55, Chris Rapier <rapier at psc.edu> wrote: > >[...]I had been using > > Blake2b512 for the hashing algorithm but I want to put in a path to use > > xxhash instead. Maintaining backward compatibility means I need to know > > something about the remote.

On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 07:55, Chris Rapier <rapier at psc.edu> wrote: >[...]I had been using > Blake2b512 for the hashing algorithm but I want to put in a path to use > xxhash instead. Maintaining backward compatibility means I need to know > something about the remote. In the case of sftp at least, that sounds like a function of the sftp-server not sshd, in which case could you

Hello, I had some difficulties in order to convert private keys between different implementations of SSH. So, I wrote the following patch to allow export of SSH2 RSA and DSA private keys into IETF SECSH format. Note that I also slightly revised the IETF SECSH key import code. Usage: use of the "-e" option on a private key file generates an unencrypted private key file in IETF SECSH

>Is there a simple way to achieve this behavior? Is there a document on >the sftp protocol somewhere? http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-00.txt -- Darren J Moffat

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948 Bug ID: 2948 Summary: implement "copy-data" sftp extension Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer- extensions-00#section-7 OS: All Status: NEW

Old news, but ... http://lwn.net/Articles/298833/ I first posted about this back in 2001 and it's still not resolved: http://osdir.com/ml/ietf.secsh/2001-09/msg00000.html 1) high latency networks are a reality that will never go away. In fact they will only become more prevalent since distributed networks continue to grow broader but (surprise) the speed of light remains a constant. 2)

Hi everyone, I'm pleased to announce version 0.6.0 of CELT, with many quality improvements. This includes better stereo coupling, better handling of transients, and better handling of highly tonal signals. In addition, packet loss robustness has been improved through the optional use of independent (intra) frames. CELT now supports a larger dynamic range, suitable for encoding 24-bit audio

Sorry for the delay. On 4/13/09, Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org> wrote: > Ivo, could you also review the updated memo-status/copyright notice, > located on page 1-2 ? Is this a new standard for writing Internet drafts? I've never seen it in other documents. Specifically, this part: "This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be created,

An updated version of my patch for Kerberos v5 support is now available from http://www.sxw.org.uk/computing/patches/openssh-2.5.2p1-krb5.patch This patch includes updated Kerberos v5 support for protocol version 1, and also adds GSSAPI support for protocol version 2. Unlike the Kerberos v5 code (which will still not interoperate with ssh.com clients and servers), the GSSAPI support is based on

Dear list, Attached is a patch that adds support for the SSH_FXP_LINK request, as described in draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-07 onwards, to the sftp server and client. It is for and has been tested on the current portable snapshot but also applies to openbsd CVS. Thanks, -- Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openssh-sftp-hardlink-pcvs-v2.patch

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi Aymeric, > > Yes, I'm receiving the emails but haven't had enough time to look into > the details yet. I've seen you responded to many comments, so what are > the ones for which we still need to respond? Summary is there: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2837/ As I understand: we need to change

there is now a draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-00.txt if someone could please check whether sftp-server.c comlies :)

Hi there, I'm developing ssh client in pure java and, recently, I'm trying to improve the port forwarding support on that stuff. However, it seems to me that sshd of OpenSSH has not supported 'cancel-tcpip-forward' request. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-connect-17.txt says that | A port forwarding can be cancelled with the following message. |

Hello everybody, I've read the ssh protocol draft http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-connect-24.txt and I wonder if the feature documented in section 7.1, page 15, last paragraph, is implemented in OpenSSH or not (sshd chooses the first free non privileged port to forward when the specified port number is 0). I need this feature and, if it isn't implemented yet, I

Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg, Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org) dedicated to latest discussion about the draft. I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation still required to the ietf

I am using sshfs with FUSE to mount a remote directory over ssh/sftp (on linux). It would be nice if df could be able to show the total size/free space of the mounted directory. I am aware that returning size/free space would have some limitations. For example, if a subdir of the mounted directory has another filesystem mounted on the remote server, this can not be represented simply. However,

Sorry for posting twice but someone mentioned the ietf draft on the attribute ... The attribute that IBM uses for their password policy is described here : http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-behera-ldap-password-policy-06.txt This might give problems with other ldap implementations in the future. I created also a bug report on this. I know that this is not really a bug but could make

Damien, Thanks for the response. Are you aware of any sftp server products that currently implement the uid / gid resolution or is this new draft just too unrefined / recent. Also, is there a definitive source for these drafts and where might they be published? Up till now I have just been reading the documentation available from www.openssh.org. I hope these questions aren't too

Hello, It seems to me the algorithm negotiation of the transport layer has a bug, it does not follow the specification of draft-ietf-secsh-transport-24, page 19, where the behaviour of first_kex_packet_follows is specified. I've got an ssh client that sends an SSH_MSG_KEXINIT message and specifies only 'diffie-hellman-group1-sha1' as key exchange algorithm. It sets