similar to: CENTOS behind m0n0wall

I know a SIP client behind a NAT trying to peer with Asterisk behind another NAT is troublesome. Has anyone had any luck doing this by interfacing Asterisk to the WAN using 1:1 NAT translation to give it a public IP while still firewalled? In my instance I'm using m0n0wall, but this is a hardware-neutral question. Thanks. -- Robert Goodyear Brand Up LLC http://www.brand-up.com

Hi all, Anyone got any VoIP traffic shaping rules for m0n0wall that they could let me look at please? Thanks -- Mark, G7LTT/KC2ENI Randolph, NJ http://www.g7ltt.com

Hi all, this is my first post... Here the situation, I've installed php 4 with yum, using the default CentOS repositories, but now I realize that I need the Informix extensions and others like unixodbc, gd etc. This last two packages where in the repository so I search with yum and I found them, and install them, but not the Informix one. So here my question, when I install a RPM package,

I am so out of my depth on this one, but I would welcome some help. I have the following network and did get it to work with m0n0wall (a BSD firewall) an option called "transparent bridge". I've switched to Clark Connect because of its support for content filtering, and installed bridge-utils. I have a home network based a single WAN-facing NIC, eth0, that gets a public IP address

I have looked at the wiki and the mailing list. But I need to find how do we setup the external IP address and the rtp ports for the Polycom IP-500 and IP-600. There web interface has a nat setting but can't find instructions on how to set this up. I would like to set this up via there ftp file setup instead of via there web setting. Also There QoS settings are set to 5 and 2 but there it

Hi All, Until now I've only used IAX2 to connect to ITSPs. I've been toying with a SIP connection to Gizmo Project, but not yet successfully. It brings to mind a question. At what point does it make sense to consider a SIP-aware firewall such as those from Ingate? I'd hate to move away from my m0n0wall, which is open source, easy to manage and has served me brilliantly for two

Hi, We're installing an * box next week (pbxtra from fonality) and I'm trying to come up with a solution for remote users that want a phone in their home. I need VPN and QoS capability, wireless support would be a nice to have. Ethernet handoff is fine, i don't need integrated dsl or cable modem... I've been googling and cruising the list and can find bits and pieces

On 01/20/2012 09:00 AM, Tait Clarridge wrote: >> > But a new problem arises ... one of the m0n0wall instances needs to use >> > DHCP to get a dynamic IP from my ISP (the others are static, so they're >> > ok). How do I get the bridge to proxy the DHCP request and forward the >> > response to the VM guest? I brought up a test instance of m0n0wall but

I have an asterisk server up and running, using Firefly in IAX mode works great, even with Firefly behind a NAT (as expected, since IAX works really well with NAT). Now I'm trying to get X-Lite and/or Firefly to work in SIP mode from behind the NAT, and I can't seem to get there. At this point, the phone will successfully register with Asterisk, and the Asterisk qualify messages get

hi all, i've been struggling with setting appropriate rules for an SMTP-server behind by NAT'd firewall. it's not that there is too little info on the web -- or here, for that matter -- there's scads of it for seemingly endless configs/req'ts -- none that seem to be exactly my own. bottom line: i'm a bit confused, and looking for some experienced advice. my goals (for

Hi all, i have a problem with 2 peers conecting to an asterisk machine, both are conected behind nat without any port mapping in the router, and the * is conected behind other nat with the port 4569 mapped to it address, the problem is: when a peer register to the asterisk the other cant register and viceversa, only gets registration the first one, im using firefly and a hardphone from wuchuan,

Hello CentOS gurus, and a belated Happy New Year (or an early Happy Chinese New Year). I'm in the process of building a CentOS-6 KVM host machine whose only function will be to run four independent 'm0n0wall' firewall guest instances. I have a couple of quad-port Intel NICs to provide four WAN-side and four LAN-side ports, which will not be shared with any other guests. Remote

I am new to VOIP, Linux and Asterisk. Through a lot of reading (this list, voip-info.org, documentation, etc.), I successfully installed FC3 and * on a new Dell SC420 with two X100P connecting to two PSTN lines at my office. I've also installed AMP to help me configure IVRs, call groups, extensions, etc. I use a Handytone-286 ATA and x-lite clients on the internal network and all works

As far as I can remember I only opened sip and tftp ports for the phone. For some reason (didn't look into it too much) the call stays with sip and doesn't use RTP. The problem you describe (the call doesn't even ring on the other side) is something I had and was solved by upgrading the firmware. Checkpoint's tracker explicitly said what connection attempts were blocked and why.

Hey, The company I work for is in the market for a new firewall. Right now we're hosting all of our own stuff (on CentOS servers) behind an old checkpoint firewall. I think Checkpoint is overkill for our needs and very expensive, plus I don't like the "per-user" charges of some commercial solutions. What do you guys suggest that we upgrade to? Here are some of the

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Marcus Schopen wrote: > > Maybe the timeout for UDP NAT mappings is a bit short on your Cisco. Try > > adding PingInterval = 30 to the tinc.conf on those clients, perhaps that > > will help. > > Thanks for pushing me into the right direction. I disabled "TCPOnly = > yes" on the host and started with "PingInterval

Hi, I have following setup: BT100 ---- Firewall/nat 1 (www.ipcop.org) ---- Internet ----Firewall/nat2 (Vigor) ---- Asterisk . I'd like to use BT100 as local extension to Asterisk. I've done simple setup and BT100 can call Asterisk and place outgoing calls. However I cannot set him to qualify, cause it is claimed as unreachable. I have port redirection at Firewall 1 (to 5060 and rtp

Hi, I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just fine, but I can't hear

Hi To investigate the UNREACHABLE issue I'm having, I need to have confirmation that it's OK for the Asterisk server to be behind a NAT router, and also have clients elsewhere on the Net behind their own NAT router? I know that clients must use STUN to resolve their public IP and punch UDP holes in their firewall, but is there something special that must be done in the configuration

I would like to make a suggestion and recommend that you put your Asterisk box on the outside and let it also pull duty as your firewall/nat router. The iptables overhead will be minimal on the system and you'll save yourself a lot of headaches in the long run. The biggest problem being that having an asterisk server behind a nat, and then also having sip phones trying to connect to said