similar to: sshd 3.7.1p1 and 3.7.1p2 on 2.0.39 linux kernel crashes

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-10-27 13:43 ------- Created an attachment (id=487) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=487&action=view) Test setresuid and setresguid for "not implemented" Please try this patch. You will need to run "autoreconf" after applying, then

standard SSH port forwarding used, but this file size limit appears. NFS mounts not using SSH have no such limits on my machines. any ideas? fractoid

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here's the output from running sshd in debug mode: debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_3.7p1 debug1: private host key: #0 type 0 RSA1 debug1: read PEM private key done: type RSA debug1: private host key: #1 type 1 RSA debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA debug1: private host key: #2 type 2 DSA debug1: setgroups() failed:

Sorry if I'm duplicating an existing patch, but... On systems with no seteuid() that have setreuid() there is an emulation, but if both are lacking (but we do have setresuid()), nothing is done. The following seems to be right, but I've only got one machine (running an ancient version of HP-UX) which needs this so it may not be general: --cut-here-- --- config.h.in.orig Thu Jun 7

Samba 2.0.3-8 installed via rpm RH5.2 I've set up security = domain. I have 2 errors: 1. I cannot map to a share on the linux PC via name. 2. When I use IP address to map a share, I get the following errors in the log.<machine> [1999/05/14 14:44:24, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 99 currently set to (real=0,eff=0) [1999/05/14 14:44:24, 0]

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 10:09 +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello again, Samba experts, > > sorry for being such a pain in your necks, but I really need to get a > recent Samba version to compile, and it looks like I definitely need > your help with this. > > In the meantime, I have found that the huge number of "conflicting > types" errors for rpc_*_init(...)

Need some help if anyone can provide it on this issue. I have a very basic setup and am trying to have samba utilize openldap. I have made sure the password is correct but for whatever reason, I am unable to connect. Here is a log of what is going on. Any help would be greatly apprecated. TIA Maximum core file size limits now 16777216(soft) -1(hard) get_current_groups: user is in 7 groups: 0,

Dear samba-Team, The bug reported in PR#12819 for AXI 4.1.5 persits also in samba 2.0.3. The Bug prevents the connecting of other users as root to any share. I have a workaround/fix tested on AIX 4.1.5 ,4.3.2 with gcc 2.8.1 here: Change samba-2.0.3/source/lib/util_sec.c funktion set_effective_uid like this: 155c155 < #elif defined(HAVE_SETREUID) --- > #elif defined(HAVE_SETREUID)

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645 Summary: Configure mis-identifies setresgid Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Hi! I'm experiencing problems with access to one of shares on server with Samba working as PDC for windows clients, after I upgraded Samba from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23 (this problem also present in 3.0.23a). There are config section for this share: ---------------------------------------------------------------- [domain] comment = Domain users exchange share path =

Hello Everyone, I must extend my THANK YOU for such fantastic work!, as well as this great resource. I've tried fiddling with AD and samba 3.0 alpha23 as well as a CVS checkout dated APR-16-03. Below are the relevant(Hopefully:)) items of my config. Once I can get a tgt and initial ticket I think I'll be O.K. I was hoping someone on this list could point out a gotcha :). TIA, Jesse.

Samba 4.12.1, single server with AD+DC on Ubuntu 18.04. Filesystem: /dev/sdb1 on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,stripe=32750,data=ordered) It all work as expected, but I occasionally get the error in subject which denies access to shares. Restarting Samba will restore functionality. What can be the cause of this problem? Thanks. [2020/05/27 18:24:35.795379, 8]

I'm running Linux 2.1.130 on an AXP, with Samba 2.0 beta 2. I have smbfs enabled in the kernel with Win 95 bug fixes enabled but I'm not running smbd. The server containing the share is an HP running Samba 1.9.16p11. I mount the share with smbmount //hpname/share -c 'mount /home/me/mydir' All is well for a while (~1 hour), but then I get kernel: smb_get_length: recv error = 5

I'm curious to know where the tdbsam password database file is kept on my Fedora 7 system. Using the unmodified smb.conf file that shipped with Fedora 7, I've enabled users using smbpasswd, and successfully accessed shares. I just can't figure out where the password database is located: [root@box ~]# service smb start [root@box ~]# setsebool samba_enable_home_dirs on [root@box ~]#

Hello, I'm trying to set up samba using ADS for authentication. I can successfully join the samba machine to the domain. Windows hosts can "see" the samba machine. After successfully joining, doing: # wbinfo -u shows me ADS-defined users. Same goes for groups. However, when I try and assign one of those users ownership of a file, I get: # chown user1 /tmp/test chown: test1:

I've got some problems with file access control on a linux-server with samba 3.0.14a compiled from a src-rpm. This is the method I've been using for the past 5-6 releases. It's a redhat 8.0 machine and the kernel version is 2.4.30. The problems seem to have appeared since upgrading from 3.0.13. Symptom 1: When using force group on a share, users from the two groups edb and

Hello Andrew, and many thanks for your fast reply! :-) Am 08.06.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > I think the key to avoiding the issue is that you have listed rpc > modules which are not modules. The only rpc server module is > rpc_mdssvc_module. Ah, OK, I see - so I seem to have been wrong when assuming that I could take the output of Samba 3.5.16 "smbd -b" command

Hi, we want to use ldapsam:trusted=yes to improve performace as nss_ldap is killing our ldap server doing enumeration. once i enable it smbd dies silently... this is the last part of a ./smbd -d 10 -i NT user token: (NULL) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups smbldap_search: base => [ou=groups,ou=filestore,dc=sunderland,dc=ac,dc=uk], filt er =>

I compiled openssh 3.7.1p1 on Solaris 9 with the Forte compiler in 64-bit mode. After authentication, a forked child of sshd dies with a Bus Error in `read_etc_default_login' (session.c). The reason is the use of `sscanf' with control string "%5lo" on a `mode_t' value. On Solaris in 64-bit mode, `mode_t' is an `unsigned int' (32 bits), whereas `long' is 64

Dear Sir, I try to install OpenSSH 3.7.1p1 on AIX 4.3.3, but I find the following problem. Would you please give some advices for me? I try to configure the s/w by entering ../configure --prefix=OPENSSH_PATH \ --sysconfdir=OPENSSH_PATH/etc/openssh \ --without-pam \ --without-prngd-socket \ --without-prngd-port \ --with-tcp-wrappers=TCPWRAPPER_PATH \ --with-pid-dir=OPENSSH_PATH/var/run/openssh \