similar to: Compaq V2000 laptop no USB recognized

Hi, I have a compaq V2000 laptop. Specs for network say its a realtek 8139/8139C+ NIC. Other distros (namely suse) said there was no problem with this was detected and worked. Mine does not work on either of the 2 V2000 laptops I have. I tried manually loading the 8139cp module then restarting the network and that did not do it. Any ideas? Jerry

Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote: >/ Hi, />/ I have a compaq V2000 laptop. Specs for network say its a />/ realtek 8139/8139C+ NIC. / Is it really a RTL8139? Or it is possible that it's a RTL8100? The reason I ask is because while the RTL8100 is supposed to be MAC compatible with the RTL8139, I'm finding

Jerry Geis wrote: >/ I have tried in the grub.conf file />/ />/ noapic />/ />/ and />/ />/ apic=off />/ />/ I am still getting the same error message about ACPI />/ in the dmesg output. />/ />/ example: />/ ACPI: PCI interupt .... IRQ 16 />/ eth0: RealTek RTL8139 ... IRQ16 />/ eth0: identified 8139 chip type />/ />/ so ACPI is grabbing IRQ

Hi, I have a v2000 compaq laptop. The realtek network and USB on this machine was not working. After adding to grub.conf "acpi=off apci=off noacpi noapic" the v2000 realtek started working and the USB worked fine... Fantastic! So I thought I would try those same options on my r4000 laptop. they had no effect.... This AMD turion 64 4000+ rating laptop is still running SLOWWW...

From: Maciej ?enczykowski <maze at cela.pl> > That's a good point - does anyone know what the new Intel > Virtualization thingamajig in the new dual core pentium D's is about? It's all speculation at this point. But there are _several_ factors. But I'm sure the first time Intel saw AMD's x86-64/PAE52 presentation, the same thing popped into my mind that popped

Dear fellow R users, I am trying to conduct a regression analysis. I have thousands of variables. The names are V1, V2,........V2000 Is there an easy way to include these variables in the regression? my model is something like that: model<- lm(y~V1+V2+.....+V2000, data=data) Thanks so much in advance, Ozlem

Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote: >/ So I thought I would try those same options on my r4000 />/ laptop. they had no effect.... This AMD turion 64 4000+ />/ rating laptop is still running SLOWWW... />/ /proc/cpuinfo has the cpu Mhz running at 2393 / Yes, the 4000+ is 2.4GHz. >/ below is my dmesg output for

Dear All, I have installed the centOS 4.3 in my laptop. OS is not detected the ethernet card as well as sound card. Pls help me for activating the lan card drivers. regards, Ajay -- Technical Officer Skype ID: erajay; National Internet eXchange of India. STPI (Software Technology Park of India), Ganga Shopping Complex,Sector-29, Noida,U.P. INDIA (M) +91-9868477444(D)+91-120-4318082

Is this a known bug? Suprisingly google didn't turn up much. I'm running DDR RAM and a AMD XP processor on CentOS 4.

I have tried in the grub.conf file noapic and apic=off I am still getting the same error message about ACPI in the dmesg output. example: ACPI: PCI interupt .... IRQ 16 eth0: RealTek RTL8139 ... IRQ16 eth0: identified 8139 chip type so ACPI is grabbing IRQ 16 and not letting eth0 have it. (I Think). How do I correctly disable it on my compaq v2000 laptop. I think it is not allowing my usb

CentOS 4.3 (fully updated, including CentOS Plus kernel). Running KDE 3.5.2 (fully updated from redhat.kde repo). I can't seem to get the OS to recognize my SD card when inserted into my USB card reader. Mepis 6 Beta 3 has no problem with it. DMESG sees nothing happening when the card is inserted. USB-STORAGE module is loaded.

Hi I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ rated. proc cpuinfo reports cpu Mhz as 997.481 Do I have to run the 64 bit version to have things run correctly? I just have the normal 4.2 loaded at this time. The laptop seems slow for 4000+ as reflected by the cpu Mhz also. Any thoughts on running the 32 bit version of 4.2 vs the 64 bit version of 4.2? Jerry

Did anyone else catch the redesign? I don''t know who''s responsible, but it''s lookin better! Good job... -- seth at subimage interactive http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060528/f9f92618/attachment.html

Jerry Geis wrote: >/ I finally got the time to try the new kernel. />/ recompiled it and now the compaq r4000 seems like an amd 64 4000+. />/ />/ THe issues of sloowww ness seemed to have gone away. / >Which kernel did you end up with? >Cheers, Chris, The subject line mentioned 2.6.14.5, I downloaded it from kernel.org today. Jerry -------------- next part --------------

I have been working on a small app that started with some scaffolding. Some of my actions still have the structure where the id''s of things are passed on the url for gets. Whats the best way to avoid the security problems that this creates? I am sure that there are many pages written on this topic but I guess I have been searching for the wrong things. Thanks Gareth -- Posted via

Gents, I first installed the 32 bit version (as you might have read) of centos 4.2, after downloading x86_64 the install process/progress is about the same. going VERY slow... The screen for formatting the partitions took a LONG time (3 partitions 10 GIG, 2 GIG swap and 50 GIG). While on that screen and moving the mouse it lagged big time and could not keep up. Anyway just reporting that so far

I am trying to plug a USB 2 device in a USB 3 slot. Nothing is being detected in "lsusb". Is there something special I need to do? I am running centos 5.5 x86_64. I thought 3.0 was backward compatible. Nothing special about my device its an RS232 to USB device. It works in 2.0 slot. Thanks, Jerry

Hello, I am hoping someone can help me.... I am trying to configure my samba...and the problem is the following: When I use nmblookup with -B option and Broadcast address it is impossible to find my samba server (named prova) that is: # nmblookup -B 10.254.14.127 prova querying prova on 10.254.14.127 name_query failed to find name prova If I do the same lookin up to another machine different

Has anyone succeeded in compiling R-1.1.0 on a Digital (Compaq) Alpha running OSF4.0F (or E)? Everything seems to compile OK (except the frequent "Warning: Unresolved:" at link time - this threw me off the scent for a while!), but then at run time I get: Fatal error: The X11 shared library could not be loaded. The error was dlopen: cannot load

I am sending an email from my machine devcentos5x64. the transcript below (hangs for 60 seconds) at the line: MAIL From:<root at devcentos5x64.msgnet.com> SIZE=56 AUTH=root at devcentos5x64.msgnet.com The email succeeds - but I am trying to figure out the 60 second delay. Neither email server is busy. Nothing is waiting. the DNS on both machines point to the same nameserver. The DNS