Jerry Geis
2005-Dec-13 20:03 UTC
[CentOS] compaq r4000 /proc/cpuinfo reports 997 and should be 2400
Hi I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ rated. proc cpuinfo reports cpu Mhz as 997.481 Do I have to run the 64 bit version to have things run correctly? I just have the normal 4.2 loaded at this time. The laptop seems slow for 4000+ as reflected by the cpu Mhz also. Any thoughts on running the 32 bit version of 4.2 vs the 64 bit version of 4.2? Jerry
David Thompson
2005-Dec-13 20:12 UTC
[CentOS] compaq r4000 /proc/cpuinfo reports 997 and should be 2400
Jerry Geis wrote:>Hi > >I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ rated. >proc cpuinfo reports > >cpu Mhz as 997.481 > >Do I have to run the 64 bit version to have things run correctly? >I just have the normal 4.2 loaded at this time. > >The laptop seems slow for 4000+ as reflected by the cpu Mhz also. > >Any thoughts on running the 32 bit version of 4.2 vs the 64 bit version >of 4.2?See AMD "Cool'n'Quiet" which reduces the CPU speed when not under load (and/or on 'niced' processes). You can disable the cpuspeed init to make it always run at the maximum speed. Dave Thompson UW-Madison
Bryan J. Smith
2005-Dec-13 20:15 UTC
[CentOS] compaq r4000 /proc/cpuinfo reports 997 and should be 2400
Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com> wrote:> Hi > I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ > rated. proc cpuinfo reports > cpu Mhz as 997.481 > Do I have to run the 64 bit version to have things run > correctly? I just have the normal 4.2 loaded at this time. > The laptop seems slow for 4000+ as reflected by the cpu Mhz > also. > Any thoughts on running the 32 bit version of 4.2 vs the 64 > bit version of 4.2?AMD PowerNow! may reduce the clock to increase battery life. Try running a heafty video or 3D application while cat'ing /proc in the background (maybe a quick for loop that sleeps every few seconds). There can be compatibility issues with AMD PowerNow!, older kernels, older BIOSes, etc... -- Bryan P.S. How are you liking the Athlon 64 / ATI Xpress 200 chipset combination under Linux? I'm very tempted to drop $800-900 on an Averec (sp?) light (4.4lbs.), 12" portable with the Turion 64 / Xpress 200 combination. I was hopeful that nVidia would enter the space with a NV44 (GeForce 61x0/nForce 4x0) since I explicitly trust their APIC/ACPI/I2C logic and MCP-04 peripherals under Linux. But that doesn't seem to be happening. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
donavan nelson
2005-Dec-13 20:15 UTC
[CentOS] compaq r4000 /proc/cpuinfo reports 997 and should be 2400
Jerry Geis wrote:> Hi > > I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ rated. > proc cpuinfo reports > > cpu Mhz as 997.481 >cpuspeed is doing the speed stepping. do this: dmesg |grep -i powernow to gain some insight> Do I have to run the 64 bit version to have things run correctly?nope> I just have the normal 4.2 loaded at this time. > > The laptop seems slow for 4000+ as reflected by the cpu Mhz also.I would guess it's a combination of throttled CPU and slow hard disk.> Any thoughts on running the 32 bit version of 4.2 vs the 64 bit > version of 4.2?why buy a 64bit system if you aren't going to use a 64bit OS?
Jerry Geis
2005-Dec-13 20:32 UTC
[CentOS] compaq r4000 /proc/cpuinfo reports 997 and should be 2400
Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote:>/ Hi/>/ I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ />/ rated. proc cpuinfo reports />/ cpu Mhz as 997.481 />/ Do I have to run the 64 bit version to have things run />/ correctly? I just have the normal 4.2 loaded at this time. />/ The laptop seems slow for 4000+ as reflected by the cpu Mhz />/ also. />/ Any thoughts on running the 32 bit version of 4.2 vs the 64 />/ bit version of 4.2? />AMD PowerNow! may reduce the clock to increase battery life. >Try running a heafty video or 3D application while cat'ing >/proc in the background (maybe a quick for loop that sleeps >every few seconds).>There can be compatibility issues with AMD PowerNow!, older >kernels, older BIOSes, etc...At the moment I tried "cpuspeed -C" to run at full speed when AC I get an error about "Could not open file for writing" /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor Jerry
Jerry Geis
2005-Dec-13 20:38 UTC
[CentOS] compaq r4000 /proc/cpuinfo reports 997 and should be 2400
Jerry Geis wrote:>/ Hi/>/ />/ I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ rated. />/ proc cpuinfo reports />/ />/ cpu Mhz as 997.481 />/ /cpuspeed is doing the speed stepping. do this: dmesg |grep -i powernow to gain some insight>/ Do I have to run the 64 bit version to have things run correctly?/ nope>/ I just have the normal 4.2 loaded at this time./>/ />/ The laptop seems slow for 4000+ as reflected by the cpu Mhz also. /I would guess it's a combination of throttled CPU and slow hard disk.>/ Any thoughts on running the 32 bit version of 4.2 vs the 64 bit/>/ version of 4.2? /why buy a 64bit system if you aren't going to use a 64bit OS? ------------------------ dmesg | grep -i powernow didnt give me much... ACPI: SSDT (v001 PTLD POWERNOW 0x0604000 LTP 0x00001) @ 0x3fefeec0 I am just running the 32 bit version now until which time I can download the 64 bit. I need a bigger pipe.... I just wanted to see what the machine would do while I waited... :) Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051213/6089eb4a/attachment-0001.html>
donavan nelson
2005-Dec-13 23:19 UTC
[CentOS] compaq r4000 /proc/cpuinfo reports 997 and should be 2400
Jerry Geis wrote:> Jerry Geis wrote: >>/ Hi > />/ > />/ I have a compaq R4000 with the 2.4GIG AMD 64 bit. 4000+ rated. > />/ proc cpuinfo reports > />/ > />/ cpu Mhz as 997.481 > />/ > /cpuspeed is doing the speed stepping. > > do this: dmesg |grep -i powernow > > to gain some insight > > > dmesg | grep -i powernow > didnt give me much... > > ACPI: SSDT (v001 PTLD POWERNOW 0x0604000 LTP 0x00001) @ 0x3fefeec0 >Must be a chipset or turion difference then. I get the following. But from other emails I see you have found an answer to your question. $ dmesg |grep powernow powernow-k8: Found 1 AMD Athlon 64 / Opteron processors (version 1.50.4) powernow-k8: 0 : fid 0xe (2200 MHz), vid 0x6 (1400 mV) powernow-k8: 1 : fid 0xc (2000 MHz), vid 0xa (1300 mV) powernow-k8: 2 : fid 0xa (1800 MHz), vid 0xe (1200 mV) powernow-k8: 3 : fid 0x8 (1600 MHz), vid 0x12 (1100 mV) powernow-k8: 4 : fid 0x0 (800 MHz), vid 0x18 (950 mV)
Apparently Analagous Threads
- compaq r4000 32 bit and 64 bit install
- compaq v2000 working with correct boot options and compaq r4000 still SLOWWW
- compaq R4000 update (hogging interrupts)
- compaq r4000 and new kernel 2.6.14.5 (used to be sloowwww r4000)
- compaq r4000 and new kernel 2.6.14.5 (used to be sloowwwwr4000)