similar to: IRIX 6.5 RhostsRSA problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "IRIX 6.5 RhostsRSA problems"

2018 Jul 06
2
Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort=yes or setuid ssh(1) ?
Hi. Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort or have ssh(1) setuid, and if so for what use case? ssh(1) has had code in it to support installing setuid root since approximately forever, however OpenBSD has not shipped it in that configuration since 2002 (and I suspect these days no vendor does). As far as I can tell, all of the reasons for this no longer apply: - setuid root was needed to bind to a
2001 May 02
1
OpenSSH 2.9
OpenSSH 2.9 has just been uploaded. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability bug-fixes (listed in the ChangeLog) as well as several new features (listed below). We would like to thank the
2001 May 02
1
OpenSSH 2.9
OpenSSH 2.9 has just been uploaded. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability bug-fixes (listed in the ChangeLog) as well as several new features (listed below). We would like to thank the
2014 Aug 27
1
R, OSX, should creating SVGs request XQuartz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 hi, on OS X, when you try and use something which depends on X11, and you don't have XQuartz installed, you receive an error message, it directs you to download XQuartz, and then it euthanizes your process. (my guess is that there is a skeleton X11 dylib installed in OS X by default, and it is responsible for the error message and the
2000 Jun 21
1
Linux sshd dumps core unless client is insecure.
pausmith at nortelnetworks.com (Paul D. Smith) had a problem where his 2.1.1p1 wouldn't connect if it was running set-UID root, unless "-P" was given. Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> suggested a firewall problem. Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> tried to help too. Now I've got the same problem: my 2.1.1p1, 1.2.2, and 1.2.3 clients won't connect to
2004 Aug 06
4
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > the current stable version. Those who are willing to give up the > > features not yet implemented in icecast2 in order to stream vorbis, can > > use the devel version. Those who don't need to stream vorbis can > > continue using the stable version. There is not a good rationality for > > Icecast2 is
2004 Aug 06
2
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > > Well, I think saying that Xiph.org doesn't care about its users at all > is too harsh. On the other hand, there's some truth in this, and I > highly appreciate it. If you want to stick to MP3, Icecast1 is for you - > nobody forces you to use it (or not), and you're also free to use > something else. Xiph.org, i.e. Jack
1998 Nov 27
1
Time to connect
Greetings Fellow Sambaiites! I have a small problem that I haven't seen addressed in any of the forums (have searched the net to no avail!). I have a small 100 mbit network................using Samba 1.9.18p10 on a Slack box as the PDC. When I initially look in the NN on any Win95,98 and NT boxes, the Samba box appears...................when I try to browse the Samba shares on the
2004 Aug 06
2
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > > http://www.xiph.org/about.html Note also the paragraph at http://www.xiph.org/ : "Xiph.Org Foundation is a non-profit corporation dedicated to protecting the foundations of Internet multimedia from control by private interests. Our purpose is to support and develop free, open protocols and software to serve the public, developer and business
2004 Aug 06
0
[Re: icecast2 ??]
On 12/30/02 10:59 AM, "Aaron Gaudio" <prothonotar@tarnation.dyndns.org> wrote: > Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: >> >> http://www.xiph.org/about.html > > Note also the paragraph at http://www.xiph.org/ : > > "Xiph.Org Foundation is a non-profit corporation dedicated to protecting the > foundations of Internet multimedia from control by
2004 Aug 06
3
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Dale Ghent wrote: > > Icecast2 is icecast2. I'm talking about it's lack of innovation (ogg > > streaming! woopdefuckingdoo) as well as it's lack of functionality that > > doesnt even near icecast 1.x (yp, acls, metadata, web-based admin). > > Apparently, you haven't tried Icecast2-alpha, yet. So... we have to try an
2004 Aug 06
4
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, Adon Irani <adon@YorkU.CA> hath decreed: > > the icecast2 developers be guilt-tripped into repeating icecast's > performance ? > _ is it not enough that OGG can have a streaming server that supports it ? Perhaps, if that is the only requirement to have a fully-functional streamer. Unfortunately, I believe this is not sufficient for the user base. So, if the
2008 Jun 05
2
Can shorewall be the solution for this situation?
We currently use a three-server setup of Firewall-1 NG (2x firewalls and a managemenent server with Rainwall clustering) and we plan to move to an open source solution. We have very specific needs and the one that is very important is: Our users pay for their internet traffic and pay-as-you-go is an option for users. In our setup we have about 25000 users. At the moment they authenticate against
2004 Aug 06
2
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> hath decreed: > > > It's icecast. It's part of xiph. It's the same project. Presumably it's > > the same developers. I don't care about the similarity of the code > > bases. One is released, the other one is not (alpha versions are not > > releases). > > No. Whilst it originally shared one
2003 Feb 26
7
XFS vs. ext3
(Sorry for cross-posting; I'm not on either ext3-users or linux-xfs, but I thought both lists might find this interesting. CC me with any replies or questions. Thanks.) (The last four paragraphs contain the interesting bits. Basically, XFS hath kick-ed the *ss of ext3 under conditions that are, for our company, critical.) Some listees might be interested in some testing I did the other
2014 Jul 17
0
Руководству Надо знать/хранить на фирме
bgColor="ghostwhite" width="98%" bgColor="honeydew" bgColor="ghostwhite" - &Beta;a??&#x61;<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 3px" size=1>&#xAD;</FONT>?<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 1px" color=#fefcfc size=1>&#28;</FONT>&#x20;&#1080;&#x43D;<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 1px"
2000 Feb 29
0
mapping of colornames into hsv: half way done
Ok, now we have the mapping of color names to color codes (see below) and conversion to rgb (something like Ben Bolker's function), but how to convert rgb to hsv? Thanks to Brian Ripley, Peter Dalgaard and Ben Bolker Details below Regards Jens etc/colors.big maps 455 names to rgb in S syntax etc/rgb.txt maps 657 names to rgb in C syntax, but unlike colors() it has mixed upper and
2004 Aug 06
4
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > or developing for it. The fact that no release packages are available > > signifies to me that icecast2 is not yet ready for prime time. This > > Well, there are, see Geoff's mail ... those are official. Multiple > problems of pretty much any kind prevented Xiph.org from getting > icecast.org in order; I
2004 Aug 06
2
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > If icecast.org is so broken, then someone ought to do what was > > suggested on the list in November (looking through the archives): > > put it out of its misery. Why are there no "official" releases? > > I already told you, there *are* official releases (or, to be exact, one > release), but
2006 Jan 31
1
Test Failed for CD3 and CD4
hi guys, I dont know if my burner here got a problem. Im downloaded the iso's for cd 3 and 4 thrice and burned it on the cd thrice also. but when i test the cd's they failed. But calculating the checksum was ok. any suggestions ? --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail. -------------- next part --------------