similar to: [Bug 3] sshd does not properly daemonize itself

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2001-10-23

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-09-30 19:02 ------- http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bind9-workers&m=103112021703700&w=2 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at

I don't like to be the bearer of bad news, but... In light of the big "ssh hangs on logout" thread (wherein the true culprit was identified as being programs that don't close inherited file descriptors), I find it somewhat ironic that one of those "broken daemon" programs that doesn't close its open fds is sshd. :( http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2876 Bug ID: 2876 Summary: PAM_TEXT_INFO and PAM_ERROR_MSG conversation not honoured during PAM authentication Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.7p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-19 04:29 ------- can you allocate ptys as non-root? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Good day I?m trying to get NUT working on Server 2012 64-bit. I can start the ntpd but as soon as I connect with upsc, the NTPD process exits with the following debug output: c:\Program Files (x86)\NUT\sbin>upsd -DDDD Network UPS Tools upsd 2.6.5-3780M 0.000000 listen_add: added 127.0.0.1:3493 0.000000 listen_add: added ::1:3493 0.015599 setuptcp: try to bind to ::1 port

My apologies, I don't know why my brain is stuck on NTPD, I meant UPSD. Regards Ge-org Brohammer -----Original Message----- From: Nut-upsuser [mailto:nut-upsuser-bounces+ge-org=kingbro.co.za at lists.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of Ge-org Brohammer Sent: 28 June 2013 01:06 PM To: nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: [Nut-upsuser] Server 2012 - 64bit NTPD Crash Good day I?m

hi friends, I am using squid-2.5 and from last two days i m getting this error in cache log. i have increased ulimit from 1024 to 8192 but still i m getting error. pls give me suggestion how to overcome this problem. [root at gateway ~]# tail -f /var/log/squid/cache.log 2006/11/24 10:41:03| WARNING! Your cache is running out of filedescriptors 2006/11/24 10:41:19| WARNING! Your

Just wondering what it will take to get the nvidia binary driver working on a pv_ops kernel. It makes it difficult to debug without the source to the nvidia driver, but I think it should be possible to get it to work without changing the binary driver. If the dom0 kernel had access to all the resources that a bare metal kernel did, then it should work right? I''m using Jeremy''s

Just wondering what it will take to get the nvidia binary driver working on a pv_ops kernel. It makes it difficult to debug without the source to the nvidia driver, but I think it should be possible to get it to work without changing the binary driver. If the dom0 kernel had access to all the resources that a bare metal kernel did, then it should work right? I''m using Jeremy''s

I''m running a ubuntu 9.04 64 bit dom0 with kernel 2.6.29.6 and xen 3.4.0. My eth0 is bridged to br0 and to my guest VMs. The dom0 is running a dhcp server on br0 which is able to provide leases to physical machines on eth0, and also to a windows xp domU which is bridged to br0. However my open solaris 2009.6 domU is unable to obtain a dhcp lease. On the opensolaris side I can see this:

I have compiled openssh for sun solaris 2.6, no errors When I try to run SSHD daemon it says the following error. This platform does not support both privilege separation and compression Compression disabled Privilege separation user sshd does not exist Any one that have answer to this problem mail me on daniel.d.olsson at telia.se <mailto:daniel.d.olsson at telia.se> //Daniel

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659 Summary: sshd failure on IRIX Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p1 Platform: MIPS OS/Version: IRIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-openssh at

O.S. Ubuntu 10.10, Maverick Meerkat 32 bit. NUT 2.4.3-1ubuntu5, package installed Belkin F6C1500-TW-RK I am having trouble starting uspd whenever I add a client from my lan to uspd.conf: LISTEN 127.0.0.1 3493 LISTEN 192.168.36.106 3493 naknight at nak-server:~$ sudo upsd -DDDD Network UPS Tools upsd 2.4.3 0.000000 listen_add: added 127.0.0.1:3493 0.000093 listen_add:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-03-19 08:31 ------- see sshd.8 X11UseLocalhost ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hi all, Have a strange behaviour that I don't know how to debug. This is when I use the Eaton PW5125 ups. I have it connected And running in standby. Starting up the drivers (pw3105 and pw5125) and they run. Start up the upsd and can read info from both of them. The 3105 is supplying the computer and the 5125 have a dummy load. The 5125 is showing that it is off line. Now when I hit the on

I''ve been trying for several days to get a xen dom0 booting as described on Boris Derzhavets blog. I have been able to boot Jeremy Fitzhardinge''s pv_ops kernel under xen, but my X server wouldn''t start so I''ve been trying to get Andrew Lyon''s rebased opensuse patches to work. I have asked for help in the freenode ##xen channel but they

On 04 Feb (10:46:55), Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-02-04 07:40:39 -0500, David Goulet wrote: > > > I would like to know if adding support for Unix socket to sshd would be a > > feature that would be consider to be added upstream? (ListenAddress). > > fwiw, i think this is a good idea, but i wouldn't implement it as an > explicit ListenAddress option:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692 Summary: sshd sometimes dies when sent multiple SIGHUPs in quick succession Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: Other URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug /497781 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW