similar to: Outlook 2003 Client

Hi all, We are running "dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5" on a CentOS release 5.5 (Final) box. I know, its an old version, but it cames up with the CentOS release (yum). Anyway. Is there a way to import the certificate, which was generated with "mkcert_dovecot.sh", permanently to the outlook 2003 clients? Every time, when our office 2003 clients fetches there emails (POP3s) from our

Hi, next problem with outlook 2003 On the IMAP Server (dovecot.x86_64 1.0.7-7.el5) I created a certificate with "mkcert_dovecot.sh". Some entries as be written to "/etc/pki/dovecot/dovecot-openssl.cnf". plaintext paswords are disables. IMAP Serverport: 993 Server needs SSL Now the outlook 2003 clients meens "the server uses a security certificate, which could not be

Hi all, in the CentOS repos, there is only dovecot V1.0.7 available. # yum list|grep -i dovecot dovecot.x86_64 1.0.7-7.el5 installed Are there other repos with a newer version (1.2.x) available? We are using CentOS release 5.5 (Final). many thanks Richard

Hi all, this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me. I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). # yum list| grep -i dhcp dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcpv6-client.x86_64 1.0.10-18.el5 installed after starting the dhcpd daemon, the windows Clients on the subnet (192.168.100.0/24) tells me, that there is no

Hello, I'm trying to install CentOS 6.0 64bit on a HP ProLiant ML110 G7 with a HP Smart Array B110i SATA RAID Controller. One logical drive (RAID 1+0) on the RAID Controller is already build. CentOS Installation can't find the logical Drive, but it shows me the zwo physical drives (sda+sdb). After searching the web, I found following hints:

Hi all, is it possible to install/activate a "out of office" messages for each user in dovecot? I've read about the Sieve scripts, but can't find a howto to install it on your dovecot 1.0.7 installation. http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve ... With v1.1 it's possible to include other Sieve scripts in your script ... I know, its an old release, so don't treat me like a

Hi there, samba drives me crasy :) following problem: 1 Sambaserver (V2.2.1) running on RedHat 7.0 -------------------------------------------- smb.conf: [global] workgroup = RIGL server string = Samba Server riglEDV load printers = yes printcap name = /etc/printcap printing = bsd ;guest account = pcguest log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50

Hello all, For some years now, I've been using Thunderbird for dovecot. I am not very satisfied with t/b so I thought of using m/s outlook but then I thought that I want to distance my clients from office products. I have a newly created dovecot installation on a very small site. Three nodes, all x86 Windows 7 professional with an ubuntu v14.04 server (x86 again) running dovecot 1.2.17.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:39:47PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:13:17 -0500 > Scott Robbins wrote: > > > You may have noticed how if Fedora, by some odd scheme, deems your password > > unworthy, you have to click Done two times. > > Centos 7 does that as well. Heh, I guess I've used good passwords in my installs then. -- Scott Robbins PGP

So, probably some of you, at least, follow Fedora, perhaps in part to see what new desktop user oriented decision will make it into the next version of RHEL/CentOS. You may have noticed how if Fedora, by some odd scheme, deems your password unworthy, you have to click Done two times. So, the latest Ananconda takes this one step further. Passwords that the system considers weak will no longer

Hi all, I have to implement a Out of Office Tool on our dovecot IMAP Server. Recently I updated dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 to dovecot-1.1.20-1_98.el5 on our CentOS release 5.6 (Final) box via "yum update" # cat /etc/yum.conf .... [atrpms] name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el$releasever-$basearch/atrpms/stable

On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > >> My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place >> where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter, >> >> raw_local_irq_save(); /* or other IRQs off without tracing */ >> ... >> kvm_wait() /* IRQ state tracing gets confused

On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > >> My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place >> where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter, >> >> raw_local_irq_save(); /* or other IRQs off without tracing */ >> ... >> kvm_wait() /* IRQ state tracing gets confused

Would anyone care to offer opinions as to the FXO interface which sucks the least :) I have an application in which it appears I must route certain calls out an analog PSTN line. Presently, I am testing an SPA-3000, but I can't seem to get the echo heard on the IP end of the call down to a non-annoying level. Any suggestions welcomed :) -Dorn

Currently the typical rejection message is: --------- Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. The following reason was given: Quota exceeded. --------- Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of course there sucky clients that can't display MDNs and users get confused. Any suggestions how to improve this message? I'm not sure if the

Might be old new... Check www.redhat.org ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Hi all, this is my first post to this list, and hope someone can help me ;-) I'm running dovecot.x86_64 1.0.7-7.el5 on a CentOS release 5.5 (Final) box. when a user tries to create a sub-subfolder in Archiv, he gets the message: "Mailbox doesn't allow inferior mailboxes" Mailclient is MS Outlook 2003 SP3 is there a spezial configuration in /etc/dovecot.conf needed?

Hi, Im running Dovecot 1.1RC1 (only IMAP). I noticed that when I connect with Outlook 2003; and I start reading new email some mails get marked (completely random) for deletion (,S -> ,ST) ?? I can set this mail to unread, undo the deletion read it again and it will stay OK. But other emails will still get marked. This only seems to happen with Outlook 2003 not with Outlook Express

Whenever an email is sent via ActionMailer, and the recipient is using Outlook 2003 (with SP2 installed), the e-mail is getting put in the junk e-mail folder. Since Outlook doesn''t give a reason it was tagged as junk, it''s hard to determine what to change. I''ve compared the message headers of the "junk" mail and a valid email sent through Outlook, and the

> > Oh dear. Mr idealist has had his day spoilt again. > You already showed yourself unworthy of getting help from people here. In fact, you are soooo smart that I don't even understand why you came here in the first place... Why don't you just go and consult yourself about your problems?