similar to: Dovecot 2.0beta4

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Dovecot 2.0beta4"

2010 Mar 25
1
dovecot 2.0beta4 zlib
Hello, When trying to enable the zlib and imap_zlib plugins, I get the following error: imap: dovecot/imap:/opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/lib2 0_zlib_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'i_stream_create_bz2' I did not compile it using --with-bzlib though and bz2 libs are available on the system. Best Regards -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:
2020 Aug 20
2
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
Using the Repo http://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest after upgrading from 2.3.10.1-3 to 2.3.11.3-3 we get numerous error messages like: dovecot: imap-login: Error: connect(tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory We use tcpwrap support in dovecot, which worked flawlessly in the older version. I can see that the socket /var/run/dovecot/login/tcpwrap is not created anymore. And comparing with
2016 Dec 30
1
FreeBSD / dovecot 2.2.27 / libwrap
It works ! It was THAT easy ! Can you suggest how to replace the hair I pulled out ? :-) On 2016-12-29 5:27 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > login_access_sockets = tcpwrap > > service tcpwrap { > unix_listener login/tcpwrap { > group = $default_login_user > mode = 0600 > user = $default_login_user > } > } > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at
2020 Aug 21
2
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
> On 21/08/2020 08:48 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > > On 20/08/20 11:02 pm, Thomas Scheunemann wrote: > > Using the Repo http://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest after upgrading from > > 2.3.10.1-3 to 2.3.11.3-3 we get numerous error messages like: > > > > dovecot: imap-login: Error: connect(tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory >
2016 Dec 30
1
FreeBSD / dovecot 2.2.27 / libwrap
I have compiled dovecot2 for FreeBSD with the tcpwrap option. A tcpwrap binary gets built and resides in the FreeBSD directory /usr/local/libexec/dovecot an examination of the compiled options (using the FreeBSD pkg install dovecot2) confirms: LIBWRAP : on yet, when I adjust dovecot.conf with: login_access_sockets = tcpwrap I get the following logged error message: 20161229 17:02:49
2016 Nov 14
2
dovecot / tcp-wrappers / FBSD 10.3
Can anyone share the proper config to get wrappers working in dovecot on FreeBSD? The dovecot examples do not seem to work, and I thought perhaps FBSD needs slightly different configs. I've compiled with: -DHAVE_LIBWRAP which I presume is the first step. The example for dovecot.conf in uncommenting: login_access_sockets = tcpwrap merely causes a log error of "imap-login: Error:
2020 Aug 21
2
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:49PM +1200, Peter wrote: > On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > > > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > > > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too
2013 Mar 03
1
tcpwrap: Fatal: master: service(tcpwrap): child $PID killed with signal 11
Hi Timo, today I've started Dovecot v2.2.rc2 (976bf9e69367) for the first time. /var/log/mail.log: Mar 3 14:28:33 mail dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.rc2 (976bf9e69367) starting up Mar 3 14:28:38 mail dovecot: master: Error: service(tcpwrap): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs Mar 3 14:28:38 mail dovecot: tcpwrap: Fatal: master: service(tcpwrap): child $PID killed with signal
2011 Aug 29
1
dovecot w/ libwrap on fbsd
Dovecot with libwrap doesn't work on FreeBSD for some reason or another. I have these lines in my /etc/hosts.allow: ALL: LOCAL 127.0.0.1: allow pop3: ALL: allow ALL: ALL: deny Yet when you try to telnet to localhost, port 110 this is what happens: Aug 29 22:48:38 dodo dovecot: pop3-login: Error: connect(tcpwrap) failed: Permission denied I also tried auth_debug=yes to see what's wrong
2010 Mar 07
1
2.0 beta 3 w/o libwrap?
I'm trying to kickstart 2.0b3 on my NetBSD system (where 1.2.x works great!), and keep hitting: Fatal: service(tcpwrap) access(/software/dovecot-2.0beta3/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory Indeed, that file doesn't exist...but I don't have nor want libwrap. It appears that doveconf includes tcpwrap... service tcpwrap { chroot = client_limit = 1
2013 Jul 03
1
tcpwrappers
hi everybody having I believe sort of plain-vanilla config with section in 10-tcpwrapper.conf as per docs login_access_sockets = tcpwrap service tcpwrap { unix_listener login/tcpwrap { group = $default_login_user mode = 0600 user = $default_login_user } } /etc/hosts.deny contains: ALL: given_host and yet dovecot logins IMAP client in whereas other tcpwrapper aware
2010 Feb 25
2
dovecot-2.0.beta3 tcpwrapper support in Solaris
Hi, 2.0 compiles fine in Solaris but and I've found only one glitch so far. Tcpwapper support needs some tweaks. I need to add CPPFLAGS=/usr/sfw/include because tcpd.h is in there. Then also LDFLAGS='-R/usr/sfw/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' is needed. It would be nice to have --with-tcpwrap-dir or something. After this linking gives an error Undefined first referenced symbol in file
2013 Apr 05
3
Configuring dovecot to use tcp wrappers
Greetings, I am looking to implement tcp wrappers with dovecot; I am using the following two links as guides to configuration: http://blog.acsystem.sk/linux/brute-force-attack-dovecot-imap-server-blocking-ip-with-tcp-wrappers http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess (you need to go to the very bottom) I'm concerned in making the configuration correctly. If you set login_access_sockets =
2013 Apr 05
3
Configuring dovecot to use tcp wrappers
Greetings, I am looking to implement tcp wrappers with dovecot; I am using the following two links as guides to configuration: http://blog.acsystem.sk/linux/brute-force-attack-dovecot-imap-server-blocking-ip-with-tcp-wrappers http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess (you need to go to the very bottom) I'm concerned in making the configuration correctly. If you set login_access_sockets =
2012 Jan 19
1
LMTP ignoring tcpwrappers
Hello, we want to use dovecot LMTP for efficient mail delivery from our MX servers (running postfix 2.8) to our storage servers (dovecot 2.0.17). However, the one problem we see is the lack of access control when using LMTP. It apears that every client in our network who has access to the storage machines can drop a message in a Maildir of any user on that storage server. To prevent this
2017 Dec 25
3
Sieve 0.5.0/Dovecot 2.3.0
Updated (current) doveconf -n attached.... On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > FTR, this is being delivered via LMTP from Exim using the recommended transport / director. > > headers from one of my tests: > Return-Path: <ler at lerctr.org> > Delivered-To: ler at lerctr.org > Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org > by
2017 Dec 25
2
Sieve 0.5.0/Dovecot 2.3.0
Using 2.3.0/0.5 and the below scripts/config, why doesn?t a mail addressed to ler_freebsd at lerctr.org get the FreeBSD flag? .dovecot.sieve points to master.sieve. Scripts: http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/sieve/ doveconf -n: thebighonker.lerctr.org /home/ler/sieve $ doveconf -n # 2.3.0 (c8b89eb): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.0 (d68c23a1) # OS: FreeBSD
2019 Sep 08
1
Subscribe to a fileinto :create mailbox?
Is it possible in pigeonhole? I.E. I do a fileinto :create "some/mail/box" How can I make it autosubscribe? doveconf -n: # 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.7.2 (7372921a) # OS: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 # Hostname: thebighonker.lerctr.org auth_default_realm = lerctr.org auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_realms = lerctr.org
2017 Jul 18
1
passwd-file, getting invalid uid 0
Did you miss the part about 0 also being hardcoded? On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:34 PM Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > That didn't change it :( > > Jul 18 15:28:14 thebighonker dovecot: auth-worker(77908): Error: > > passwd-file /etc/passwd: User root has
2017 Jul 13
5
passwd-file, getting invalid uid 0
Per my earlier post about system and virtual users, I have everything working, but I'm seeing the following message, and wondering: 1) does it matter? 2) is there a way to suppress it? I have an Exim /etc/aliases entry that sends root to me. Jul 13 14:38:47 thebighonker dovecot: auth-worker(13055): Error: passwd-file /etc/passwd: User root has invalid UID '0' doveconf -n: # 2.2.31