Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "sieve-cvs build failing @ 'make'"
2007 Dec 31
1
Segmentation fault in dovecot-sieve-1.1.2 + dovecot-1.1.beta13
Hi,
 
dovecot-sieve-1.1.2 + dovecot-1.1.beta13 segfaults with
the following sieve filter:
---
require ["imapflags"];
if header :contains "subject"
["test"]
{
 addflag
"$testflag";
}
---
 
when a message with a subject containing "test"
is delivered via dovecot lda.
 
The fault backtrace is:
 
(gdb) run
Starting
2006 Sep 14
2
Quota plugin rewrite
Backported from CVS HEAD to branch_1_0. You can get it as a patch from
http://dovecot.org/patches/1.0/quota-rewrite.diff
New features include support for multiple quota roots, so you could have
eg. per-user quota and a larger domain quota (although no backend
actually supports this yet..).
The more important feature is that you can configure specific mailboxes
to have a bit more space available
2006 Sep 11
1
what defines dovecot LOG perms?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
on dovecot launch, 'dovecot.log' is created as:
    -rw------- 1 root  testuser 271 2006-09-11 07:58 dovecot.log
which causes an apparent perms prob with exim using dovecot's LDA ...
what/how do i define/change the LOG's ownership/perms with?
it seems to ignore the dovecot.conf umask setting, etc.
thx.
richard
- -- 
/"\
\
2006 Aug 27
1
format for per-user QUOTAs in passwd-file?
what's the correct format for setting per-user override quotas in a passwd-file?
in my "dovecot.conf", i've:
	protocol imap {
		mail_plugins    = quota imap_quota
		mail_plugin_dir = /usr/local/dovecot-plugins/imap
		plugin {
			quota        = maildir:storage=10240 # 10 MB quota limit
		}
in my "imap_user_file", i've:
	passdb passwd-file {
		args            =
2006 Aug 23
0
bug? order dependencies in branch_1_0 conf file
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
bldg dovecot cvs branch_1_0 on osx, i'm seeing a sensitivity to order in
protocol statements.
e.g., on launch:
THIS WORKS FINE:
	protocol lda {
	 sendmail_path = /usr/local/exim/bin/exim
	 ...
	 plugin {
	  quota = maildir:storage=10240 # 10 MB quota limit
	 }
	}
but, THIS DOES NOT
	protocol lda {
	 ...
	 plugin {
	  quota =
2006 Sep 21
2
bug(let): openssh v4.3p2 'ok' out-of-box; 'configure' does not survive 'autoreconf'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
building OPENSSH v4.3p2 on OSX 10.4.7, all's fine (config, nake, 
install, exec) out-of-the-box. so, to be clear, this is NOT a blocker, 
by any stretch ...
that said, however ...
if, instead of a don't-monkey-with-it build, prior to ./configure, i:
	autoreconf -i -f
then, a subsequent:
	./configure \
	  --prefix=/usr/local/openssh \
2006 Aug 16
1
help debugging TLS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
i've built dovecot latest cvs on OSX 10.4.7.  i'm making a 1st attempt @
trying/failing to get TLS operation up-n-running ...
my install's OK:
	Install prefix ...................... : /usr/local/dovecot
	File offsets ........................ : 64bit
	I/O loop method ..................... : poll
	File change notification method
2006 Sep 08
0
quota infor @ wiki page
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi matthias,
reading the dovecot wiki page:
	http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota
that, apparently, you last edited (created?):
	Quota (last edited 2006-06-13 15:27:38 by MatthiasAndree)
i note:
"
	plugin {
	  # 10 MB quota limit
	  quota = maildir:storage=10240
	  # 1000 messages quota limit
	  quota = maildir:messages=1000
	  # 10 MB + 1000
2006 Sep 28
0
[BUG(let)] Dovecot does not recognize threaded/reentrant mysql libs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
i build mysql (currently v5.0.22) on OSX 10.4.7 w/ threading enabled.
i.e., i build the reentrant libs:
	libmysqlclient_r.dylib
rather than the 'usual':
	libmysqlclient.dylib
currently, to make Dovecot 'play nice' and recognize the reentrant 
libs, I:
	perl -pi -e 
2006 Sep 09
2
request to have dovecot authenticator driver 'officially' included/supported
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
per the exim docs @:
	http://exim.org/exim-html-4.62/doc/html/spec_html/ch36.html
a cyrus_sasl authenticator driveer is 'included' in exim core.
given that Dovecot has become a very attractive alternative for an 
increasing number of folks, and there's a patch against exim 4.43 here:
2006 Aug 29
1
dovecot SASL as auth backend to exim?
hi,
i'm running dovecot branch_10 cvs on OSX 10.4.7 w/ exim 4.63.
i'd like to use Dovecot's SASL as an auth backend to exim, instead of 
Cyrus-SASL.
@ dovecot's sasl page:
   http://wiki.dovecot.org/Sasl
i know there's a patch against exim 4.43:
   http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/AuthenticatedSmtpUsingDovecot
that, purportedly, enables EXIM to use dovecot's SASL as an
2006 Sep 09
2
SSL_accept failed
Hello, I'm new to dovecot. I just installed it a few days ago on  
FreeBSD via the ports and got it up and running without too much  
trouble. Although yesterday I turned on the SSL/TLS features and  
tried to get secure connections to work.
I don't get any error messages when launching dovecot, I saw it  
successfully create the SSL parameters after first enabling the  
feature yet I
2006 Sep 09
0
dovecot LDA w/ exim: "dyld: Library not loaded" & "trace trap" errors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
i've Dovecot 10branch head built on  on OSX 10.4.7.
i've also exim 4.63 configured for use with dovecot's AUTH.
on local delivery via exim -> dovecot LDA, i see two errors:
	(1) dovecot_lda transport output: dyld: Library not loaded: 
/usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.0.9.8.dylib
	(2) Child process of dovecot_lda transport (running
2006 Aug 28
1
unknown dovecot error. imap or logging rate?
hi,
i've dovecot cvs 10branch installed on OSX 10.4.7.
when i login from my MUA (in this example, Mulberry), functionally all looks OK.
BUT, i *do* see one error in the log output,
	dovecot: Aug 27 20:43:25 Error: IMAP(testuser at mydomain.com): Sending log 
messages too fast, throttling..
Is this an imap error? or is it 'just' the error of logging too fast?
if the latter, what
2007 Mar 29
3
MANAGESIEVE patch v4 for dovecot 1.0.rc28
Hello dovecot users,
I have updated the MANAGESIEVE patch to fix the currently known small 
problems with the protocol implementation. It is designed for rc28, but 
also compiles cleanly with the current cvs branch_1_0.
Change Log V4
-------------
- Added managesieve_implementation_string setting to the managesieve 
configuration. This can be used to customize the default 
2006 Aug 20
2
maildir autodetect failing. what's wrong with this setup?
i'm setting up for virtual_users w/ maildir.
i have in my dovecot.conf:
 auth default {
  passdb passwd-file {
   args = /etc/dovecot/imapd.passwd
  }
  userdb static {
   args = static uid=300 gid=300 home=/var/dovecot/mail
mail=maildir:/var/dovecot/mail/%d/%n/Maildir nice=10
  }
 }
 default_mail_env =
maildir:/var/dovecot/mail/%d/%n/Maildir:INDEX=/var/dovecot/indexes/%d/%n
in
2012 Oct 11
1
[LLVMdev] Question about the old C back-end
Hi Duncan,
On 11/10/12 15:47, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Roel,
>
>> When going through the internals of the old C back-end, I see that the CBE
>> encapsulates arrays into a struct.  The source code has the following comment to
>> explain this behaviour.
>>
>>        // Arrays are wrapped in structs to allow them to have normal
>>        // value semantics
2016 Aug 29
2
invariant.load metadata semantics
Sanjoy, can you clarify this bit about JVM array lengths?
Presumably the same pointer can point to two arrays of different lengths
during a program's execution.  Does this mean that you're relying on
invariant.load having function scope?  That is, correctness depends on the
pointer not being reused for an array of a different length between the
first invariant load of that array length in
2012 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Question about the old C back-end
Hi Roel,
> When going through the internals of the old C back-end, I see that the CBE
> encapsulates arrays into a struct.  The source code has the following comment to
> explain this behaviour.
>
>       // Arrays are wrapped in structs to allow them to have normal
>       // value semantics (avoiding the array "decay").
>
> For example, the CBE translates:
>
2012 Oct 11
3
[LLVMdev] Question about the old C back-end
Hello all,
When going through the internals of the old C back-end, I see that the 
CBE encapsulates arrays into a struct.  The source code has the 
following comment to explain this behaviour.
      // Arrays are wrapped in structs to allow them to have normal
      // value semantics (avoiding the array "decay").
For example, the CBE translates:
   @a = common global [10 x i32]