similar to: Problems with deliver (LDA)

Hi, The bug reported in http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-July/014786.html still exists in 1.0.rc6 % grep "$ ./configure" dovecot-1.0.rc6/config.log $ ./configure --prefix=/srv/software/dovecot Install prefix ...................... : /srv/software/dovecot File offsets ........................ : 64bit I/O loop method ..................... : poll File change notification method

This part of the body will be zapped by Dovecot's deliver... This is bad.... Injecting the message: % cat /tmp/mail.txt | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject Having qmail process the message: % sudo /var/qmail/rc status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 new msg 1596241 info msg 1596241: bytes 364 from <csa at csa-net.dk> qp 23105 uid 1000 starting delivery 1: msg 1596241 to local csa at csa-net.dk

We are currently implementing the backends for other solvers (you can follow the progress here: https://github.com/mikhailramalho/clang). So far we got Boolector, MathSAT and Yices ready. CVC4 should be done soon. When used to refute bugs, they all give roughly the same results: a ~5% speedup if there are refuted bugs or a ~5% slowdown if no bug is refuted. I've only tried to analyze one

On 4/12/06, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:tedm@toybox.placo.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:04 PM > >To: Nikolas Britton > >Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE... > > >

Hi. I've got a strange issue here. Some time ago (in march ;) I upgraded my FreeBSD-6.0 Samba 2.2 to 3.0 (currently 3.0.24). After creating groupmaps and doing all the other upgrade tasks, everything seemed to be alright. However, it was not possible to login from some machines (getting error for the wrong password). After disjoining and rejoining domain with these machines, it was possible

Note: I am almost certain that this has been asked and answered here before, so my apologies for the redundant query. I also know that there are several packages that will do this, but I wish to do it using base R functions only (see below). The query: Suppose I have a character vector of names like this: somenames <- c("Heigh", "Ho", "Silver", "Away")

Using Samba 3.0.2pre1 under SuSE 8.2. I have seen several references now in this list noting that the browse for machine accounts in Samba 3 is broken, and 'People' should be used instead. I changed smb.conf to 'ldp machine suffix = ou=People' and I changed smbldap_conf.pm to '$computersou=(People). I then cleared ldap, ran smbldap-populate.pl, and changed the uid of

Gabor, Duncan, et. al. 1. Thank you for your great comments and solutions. This is what I was hoping for! 2. Duncan: I completely agree with your criticisms. In fact, I realized the for() loop only needed the <- assignment, but your comment is important to note. However, I didn't like the for() loop either; I *much* preferred your Reduce() solution which is exactly the sort of elegant

Another solution. reformulate + substitute + as.formula: substitute(~ (.)^2, list(. = reformulate(somenames)[[2]])) |> as.formula() On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 5:31?PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Note: I am almost certain that this has been asked and answered here > before, so my apologies for the redundant query. > > I also know that there are several

Dear group, I have these 2 following data frame: allcon <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = structure(1:17, .Label = c("COFFEE C Jul/10", "COPPER May/10", "CORN Jul/10", "CORN May/10", "COTTON NO.2 Jul/10", "CRUDE OIL miNY May/10", "GOLD Jun/10", "HENRY HUB NATURAL GAS May/10", "ROBUSTA COFFEE (10)

Thanks, Rich. I thought of that, too, but it violates the spirit of my restraints (to avoid character strings), which I unfortunately did not clearly articulate. So my apologies for that failure. My concern is that with more complex model formula, using as.formula, etc. to parse/convert character strings can get a bit hairy. But in most cases, as here maybe, it may be perfectly fine. So think of

Is there a means to split a vector into its individual elements without going the brute-force route for arguments to a predefined function call? offred.rgb <- c(1, 0, 0) * 0.60; ## Brute force style offred.col <- rgb(offred.rgb[1], offred.rgb[2], offred.rgb[3], names = "offred") ## Desired style

Hello, I'm Paul Semel, a French student in computer science. I am currently in my 4th year (1st year of graduate school) at EPITA and enrolled in the system and security laboratory of the school. I would be very interested in working on a LLVM project during this GSoC. Implementing a PoC for an unsequenced modification checker in CSA helped me discover LLVM. However, I would like to

> somenames <- c("Heigh", "Ho", "Silver", "Away") > as.formula(paste("~(",paste(somenames, collapse="+"),")^2")) ~(Heigh + Ho + Silver + Away)^2 > > On Mar 29, 2025, at 14:30, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > somenames <- c("Heigh", "Ho", "Silver",

As always, I would like to thank all who responded for their insights and suggestions. I have learned from them. Thus far, my own aesthetic preference -- and therefore not to be considered in any sense as a "best" approach -- is to use Duncan's suggestion to produce the call directly with call() rather than substitute in my simple for() loop; i.e. somenames <-

my take of the assignment was to avoid 'parse' specifically. we start with a character vector, so avoiding characters is not possible. i was dealing with the fortune "if parse is the answer, you have the wrong question" Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2025, at 15:39, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: ? Thanks, Rich. I thought of that, too, but it violates

I am confused. Richard's answer that Bert did not like did not use parse explicitly. Richard pasted together a string that a function like lm() will have to parse to run the analysis. However, the answers so far do not use parse(). In the reply to Richard, Bert indicated we cannot use strings. Even if I pass a vector where R can assume that the first variable is the dependent variable and all

Hi Unnikrishnan C, On 18/01/13 09:09, unni_c at csa.iisc.ernet.in wrote: > Hello, > > I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm > module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? > > Unnikrishnan C do you know how to run LLVM's nightly testsuite? It has support for SPEC. When you configure LLVM you need to use --with-externals to

I need to configure a small proxy appliance which doesn't require a lot of CPU power. I'm looking for any warnings this group may have regarding CentOS-5 on the following: - Acer AspireRevo 3610 (Atom CPU) - Dell Inspiron 537s (Celeron) - Any other small machines you might recommend (UL approved) I need to implement dual NICs, and for the Dell it should be no problem finding a

R-help, I wish to replace NULL elements(or missing) in the following list : > z2 $cod mean sd 62.56190 12.65452 $haddock mean sd 36.61490 11.50365 $ling mean sd 86.17949 20.43587 $saithe mean sd 50.275847 5.453606 $whiting NULL $"norway pout" mean sd 13.739623 1.393104 $"great silver smelt" mean