Nikolas Britton
2006-Apr-13 01:12 UTC
ICH7 SATA RAID Broken, Was (Re: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE...)
On 4/12/06, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> wrote:> > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:tedm@toybox.placo.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:04 PM > >To: Nikolas Britton > >Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE... > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > >Nikolas Britton > >>Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:25 PM > >>To: Ted Mittelstaedt > >>Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >>Subject: Re: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE... > >> > >> > >>I think the ICH7 sata problem has already been fixed, check the logs > >>here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/ata/ if not > >>jump onto the stable mailing list and start waving your hands. > >> > > > >I'm doing a make release on today's cvs as we speak, I'll see tomorrow > >if it recognizes the disks. > > > > Nikolas, > > Just an update, no the ICH7R problem has not been fixed. > > OpenSUSE recognizes the array, though. >Send email to S?ren Schmidt sos@FreeBSD.org and/or post this on the stable mailing list, their is nothing I can do personally that will fix it for you. You could start hacking away at the problem if you know some C, digging around in /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ If you're just now joining us this is about: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=95184 P.S. I'm cc'ing this to freebsd-stable and soren, removed freebsd-questions -- BSD Podcasts @ http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
Ted Mittelstaedt
2006-Apr-13 06:16 UTC
ICH7 SATA RAID Broken, Was (Re: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE...)
>-----Original Message----- >From: Nikolas Britton [mailto:nikolas.britton@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 5:47 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; sos@freebsd.org >Subject: ICH7 SATA RAID Broken, Was (Re: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE...) > > >On 4/12/06, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> wrote: >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:tedm@toybox.placo.com] >> >Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:04 PM >> >To: Nikolas Britton >> >Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: RE: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE... >> > >> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of >> >Nikolas Britton >> >>Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:25 PM >> >>To: Ted Mittelstaedt >> >>Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>Subject: Re: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE... >> >> >> >> >> >>I think the ICH7 sata problem has already been fixed, check the logs >> >>here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/ata/ if not >> >>jump onto the stable mailing list and start waving your hands. >> >> >> > >> >I'm doing a make release on today's cvs as we speak, I'll >see tomorrow >> >if it recognizes the disks. >> > >> >> Nikolas, >> >> Just an update, no the ICH7R problem has not been fixed. >> >> OpenSUSE recognizes the array, though. >> > >Send email to S?ren Schmidt sos@FreeBSD.orgI have been already. Soren is very responsive to PR's if the people filing them meet him halfway and he responded as soon as the PR was filed.>and/or post this on the >stable mailing list, their is nothing I can do personally that will >fix it for you.I know that. What I was pointing out is that while your enthusiasm is commendable, FreeBSD 6.1 really isn't totally ready for prime time. The HP DL320 G4 is a pretty cheap server - it's positioned squarely to compete agressively with the black box intel motherboard servers out there. It's also got an embedded remote control package that is fantastic - you can do a nuke and repave of the server remotely if you want. We are going to see a lot of these out there pretty soon. And if HP could fuck up the SATA controller to make it not work, then other server vendors can do it also. I suspect this is the tip of the iceberg with the ICH7R controllers. Damn Intel for designing a controller that apparently lets designers "improve" it.>You could start hacking away at the problem if you >know some C, digging around in /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ >Soren sent a patch this morning which I think gave him some more data to work with. We will see. Unfortunately, though, getting the SATA controller working on this beast is just the first problem - there's also (I suspect) something not kosher about the ethernet ports either. But until I get a system on it, I can't dig into that. Ted
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bug 602] enormous bitching about netdb.h
- [Bug 601] configure script doesen't setup preprocessor flags properly
- -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- Documenting the NUT driver-qualification process
- New APC "SMT" UPSes support MODBUS, will there be support in NUT?