similar to: Per-user Reply-To headers

I was hoping to use RedCloth for textilize support to allow end users to enter textilized text (In blog comments, for example), but these bugs seem to make RedCloth unsuitable for that purpose: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2989&group_id=216&atid=891 http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1779&group_id=216&atid=891

mechanize version 0.6.10 has been released! * <http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/> The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: #

Considering two crashing bugs, which have got no response (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3587525&group_id=80013&atid=558446 and https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3592291&group_id=80013&atid=558446) and the lack of activity in its Git repository, I am inclined to think that CLucene's current release series (e.g. 2.3.3.4) should be

I have to confess that I did not know about facets before reading Ashley Moran''s post: http://aviewfromafar.net/2007/10/21/quick-and-dirty-facets-in-rspec-trunk Not knowing about the facets solution, I made a couple of feature requests for nested describes: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=14980&group_id=797&atid=3152

This is my first message to the list. Hello everybody! I just wanted to let you know that I submitted a couple of patches for two features that you might find them of interest. The first one adds support for unparsed responses to Facebooker::Session and Facebooker::Service models. This allows to use the Facebooker::Session.post method to obtain a plain response from the Facebook API, useful for

mechanize version 0.6.5 has been released! http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/ The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: =

Perhaps one of you OS X folks could take a look at this, and try to help? http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=65&group_id=35&atid=218 We also had this Mandrake Linux problem reported: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=52&group_id=35&atid=219 Kevin

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284 Summary: allow sftp when rlogin=false Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v4.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284 Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aixtools at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> --- Just thought it could be

This evening I ran into the problem Chuck Clifton referred to in message 86 of Volume 71 Issue 9 of this list. That is, objects created by lmer change after calling pvals.fnc on that lmer object when using lme4 version 0.999375-16 and 0.999375-28. This is somewhat troublesome. The bug tracker on R-Forge (

Hello, I recently made a feature request with a patch for terser mocks. http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=10412&group_id=1917&atid=7480 Here are some examples with their current equivalents: the_mock.expects.foo(1,2) {|a, b| :bar} the_mock.expects.foo(1,2).returns(:bar) the_mock.expects(:foo).with(1,2) {|a, b| :bar} the_mock.expects(:foo).with(1,2).returns(:bar)

Heya all, Anyone have any ideas on this one? http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13825&group_id=85&atid=411 It''s easy enough to rescue, I''d just like to know what MRI does in this case, so we can duplicate it. Regards, Dan

Hi I just made some changes / additions for myself in facebooker and posted the patches on rubyforge, e.g.: https://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=18639&group_id=4187&atid=16130 (adds support for fb:dialog FBML tag) Is this the right way to do it? --simon -- http://simonwoodside.com

v1.1 has now: # Maximum number of connections allowed for a user. The limits are enforced # separately for IMAP and POP3 connections, so you can move this setting # inside protocol {} to have separate settings for them. NOTE: The user names # are compared case-sensitively, so make sure your userdb returns usernames # always using the same casing so users can't bypass this limit!

To all who have an AMD + Windows based PC: I have gotten a few similar bug reports about encoding errors with FLAC. The common features are: - Repeatedly encoding the same file with verify will have verify errors some of the time (looks like aroung 50%) and the verify errors will occur in different places each time. - This is happening on AMD PCs running Windows. More reports come from

When setting up headers for a mail message, I have a few @headers["X-foo"] = ''blah'' lines, and all the X-whatever headers work fine. However, I also need to set the References, In-Reply-To and Message-ID headers, and for some reason, when I set those headers, they don''t show up in the transmitted email. Is there something I need to do to allow me to set them?

Hi Roscoe, I couldn't make it though that excel worksheet without my eyes glazing over... but do you want something like data(mtcars) tab <- xtabs(~cyl + gear, data=mtcars) tab/sum(tab) ? Best, Isat On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Roscoe <Roscoe at exemail.com.au> wrote: > Dear R-Help, > > First post, be gentle... > > I am new to R: I can perform basic functions

> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > > I see you've added a Reply-To header later. The canonical response in > > this case is for someone to reference: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Yes, I've read that page. It says basically that it makes replying > privately to the sender difficult. I'm sure it does, but

Hey, I have an issue with misformatted vacation emails. Part of the initial mail ends up in the vacation response and the headers of the vacation response end up in the body. Which also leads to the wrong charset being used by (some) MUAs. (Should be utf-8 but the inital mal was ascii only). I think I narrowed the trigger of the bug down to a long Reference: header line. It only happens if the

A new TRAC entry with patch has been added (initially for Camping) to allow X-SendFile on Windows to use DirHandler to send files on drives other than the current drive, if the DirHandler base path is "/" (which is the way Camping uses DirHandler). As it was, "/" gets expanded to "C:/", and then you can''t serve files on any other drive, which I needed to do