similar to: Dovecot Pronunciation/Meaning

Hello, LLVMers. I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? Thanks, Seung

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? I pronounce it just like the english word, which is probably one of your later two options :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Jul 3, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > Hello, LLVMers. > > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? We've been pronouncing it kl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: abreve.gif Type: image/gif Size: 62 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Anyone know how centos is actually pronounced? When people I work with ask me which linux I run, I say it like the word scent - oh - s, with a sharp S on the end. How's everyone else say it? How's it supposed to be said?

Oops, wrong address.. -------- Original Message -------- Message-ID: <3E0618CB.1060106 at is.a.fakepope.com> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:55:55 -0800 From: Jesse Peterson <erage at is.a.fakepope.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020901 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dovecot Mail List <dovecot at procontrol.fi> Subject:

I have the most interesting problem... I've compiled dovecot from CVS with a checkout on 2002-12-15 around 23:00 PST. When I select a message in my MUA I can view it and stuff, however, if I select another message, or folder, the message disappears. It appears that dovecot shortens the Maildir message name to ":2,S" and then you can't access the message from the MUA again.

Why is docecot called dovecot? Actually, nobody likes these "rats with wings". ;-) Timo, can we know that or is it a secret? Sven

It would seem that dovecot cannot detect my maildir. The system DO NOT use "~/Maildir". It is arbitrary across a few systems, actualy, and am curious if there is a way to "force" in the config file where the maildir explicitly resides, much like Postfix's "home_mailbox" configuration parameter. On a side note, I compiled dovecot 0.99.4 on a NetBSD

in the config file i have "ssl_disable = yes", however, i get this in my LOG_MAIL syslog: "Dec 17 00:21:07 host imap-master: Can't create temporary SSL parameters file /default/configured/directory/ssl-parameters.dat.tmp: No such file or directory" I know what the error is, and how to fix it, but it's an SSL thing which should have been disable according the

Using passwd-file authentication I run into some problems.. This is my passwd file: user:0cc175b9c0f1b6a831c399e269772661[34]:6660:6660:0:/some/mail/directory/user:0::: My MUA tells me after enter my user/pass that the server disconnected, OK. So I netcat into the imap server, and issue an "C: LOGIN user a" in which case I get the error "Fatal: USER environment missing".

I couldn't reproduce this again (because i can't get imap-master running due to problem below..) but.. When compiling without shadow, passwd, or pam, when logging in I get after a successful login (in my syslog): Dec 28 22:39:38 badcase imap(username): MAIL environment missing and autodetection failed (home /some/home/directory) Now I thought this was covered in a previous fix before

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > MUCH more FOSS oriented I've been taking an informal survey on this for awhile now. I know the new, official acronym is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). But even before that acronym was popular, I had long argued that Stallman's insistence on calling it "Free Software" when that could be confused with

On Fri, April 17, 2015 12:50 am, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 17/04/15 12:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> But being not native >> English speaker, I use it ("not native English speaker") > Figured as much, which is why I mentioned it ;) > >> as an excuse for >> being unable to pronounce anything. > Not as if most English speakers can pronounce many English

> Ubuntu and Knoppix can say they use Debian sources ... SLAX can say it > uses Slackware sources. Those guys have trademarks too. Debian and Slackware don't sell "enterprise" products. And many such projects are non-profit or otherwise. Unless Debian plans to establish itself as a commercial player, they don't need to defend their trademark. In fact, the commercial

Greets, Every linux user that sets up a sound card using sndconfig heres Linus pronouncing "Linux" - I confess that's how I learned to pronounce it right, until then I prononced it 'l-EYE-nucks' - I was wondering - what's the correct pronounciation of 'Ogg Vorbis'? I pronounce it 'OOOg' (a long 'O' sound or a portuguese 'U' if you must

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > IBM has since totally changed their thoughts with regards to GNU/Linux. Actually, their cut-off of Monterey had everything to do with their current change in strategy on Linux back in 2000+. Monterey was established before IBM's interest in GNU/Linux. After IBM realized that it could use an economical complement in Linux, it saw

Good day. I am trying to build a rather weird setup. The basic idea is to have a relatively simple IMAP client and let dovecot do the actual connections. So far both the documentation and my trials on this front have been rather fruitless. The desired components: - 1 dovecot server, acting as a proxy - 1 master account - 1 client connection - 0 "real" user accounts, so no

From: Collins Richey > Sounds pretty religious-based to me. > IBM=bad > HP,Sun, RedHat, SCO=good. > OTOH, from some of your comments, Novell=better. Are you really that shallow? IBM is our partner, not our friend. Sun has its interests too, and has 5 different entities of focus, which vary. Red Hat is a tale of two companies, cut-throat business combined with GPL-analness (like

From: Martyn Drake <martyn at drake.org.uk> > To be quite honest with you - that's been and gone so quickly I can't > ever remember what my position was at that time. It actually happened over the span of 2 years before any name change. With the introduction of RHEL as a separate product, RHL was having an identity crisis. It used to be that ".2" was the

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just