Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Nuisance parameters"
2011 Oct 18
1
nuisance variables
*Dear experts,*
Please excuse me for disturbing... Right now I am struggling with GLM a
bit... Would you be so kind to provide me a solution on using nuisance
variables. The problem is that I have data on Depression (volumetric
measurements of different brain regions) and I want to include age, gender
and education as nuisance parameters in the model. In the other words I
would like to model the
2011 Mar 01
2
regression with categorical nuisance variable
Hi,
I am new to R, so I am unsure of the formula to set up this analysis.
I would like to run a linear model with a continuous dependent
variable (brain volume) and a continuous independent variable (age)
while controlling for a categorical nuisance variable (gender).
Age and brain volume are correlated.
There are no gender differences in age but there are significant
gender differences in brain
2010 Nov 11
0
Nuisance parameters for Geyer Saturation process.
Hello group,
Can someone please put me through how to estimate the nuisance parameters
(Saturation parameter and radius) for the Geyer saturation process?
It seems quite confusing to me how these parameters are achieved, but they
are very important in determining the interaction between points in a point
process.
I am using Spatstat package.
Thanks.
neba
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Apr 08
0
lme, mixed models, and nuisance parameters
I have the following dataset:
96 plots
12 varieties
2 time points
The experiment is arranged as follows:
A single plot has two varieties tested on it.
With respect to time points, plots come in 3 kinds:
(1) varietyA, timepoint#1 vs. variety B, timepoint#1
(2) varietyA timepoint #2 vs. varietyB timepoint #2
(3) varietyA timepoint #1 vs. variety A timepoint#2
- there are 36 of each kind
2003 Jul 17
2
Minor nuisance with rw1071
Hola!
Starting with rw1071, just after starting Rgui the scope is not with
Rconsole, but some other place. This means I have to do a mouse click
in the Rconsole before starting to write the first command. Since I
always forget this, I end up writing the first command twice.
This is of course only a minor nuisance, but why is focus no longer
set to Rconsole window when start-up?
This is on
2024 Aug 10
1
'Too many authentication failures' nuisance
On Saturday, August 10, 2024 10:13 AM, Chris Green wrote:
>I have several ssh keys in the ~/.ssh directory of my desktop machine.
>As a result whenever I try to connect to a system which uses password
>authentication I get the "Too many authentication failures" error.
>
>Yes, I know I can get round this by setting PreferredAuthentications but
this is
>rather a nuisance
2024 Aug 10
1
'Too many authentication failures' nuisance
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 10:34:45AM -0400, rsbecker at nexbridge.com wrote:
> On Saturday, August 10, 2024 10:13 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> >I have several ssh keys in the ~/.ssh directory of my desktop machine.
> >As a result whenever I try to connect to a system which uses password
> >authentication I get the "Too many authentication failures" error.
> >
>
2024 Aug 10
1
'Too many authentication failures' nuisance
On 8/10/24 17:13, Chris Green wrote:
> I have several ssh keys in the ~/.ssh directory of my desktop machine.
> As a result whenever I try to connect to a system which uses password
> authentication I get the "Too many authentication failures" error.
>
> Yes, I know I can get round this by setting PreferredAuthentications
> but this is rather a nuisance to have to do
2024 Aug 10
3
'Too many authentication failures' nuisance
I have several ssh keys in the ~/.ssh directory of my desktop machine.
As a result whenever I try to connect to a system which uses password
authentication I get the "Too many authentication failures" error.
Yes, I know I can get round this by setting PreferredAuthentications
but this is rather a nuisance to have to do individually for all
systems that use password authentication. It
2008 Jan 09
2
[Bug 1428] New: Banner output can be a nuisance with non-interactive use
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428
Summary: Banner output can be a nuisance with non-interactive use
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.3p2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo:
2007 Jun 21
1
Result depends on order of factors in unbalanced designs (lme, anova)?
Dear R-Community!
For example I have a study with 4 treatment groups (10 subjects per group) and 4 visits. Additionally, the gender is taken into account. I think - and hope this is a goog idea (!) - this data can be analysed using lme as below.
In a balanced design everything is fine, but in an unbalanced design there are differences depending on fitting y~visit*treat*gender or
2012 Jun 19
2
matchit - can I weight the parameters?
This may be a really obvious question but I just can't figure out how to do it.
I have a small dataset that I am trying to compare to some controls. It is essential that the controls are matched on Cancer Stage (a numerical factor between 1 and 4), and then ideally on Age (integer), Gender (factor), Performance Status(factor).
I'm using matchit to try and do this, but it seems to give
2008 Jul 19
0
fixed effect significance with lmer() vs. t-test
I am looking at data of the following structure:
n <- 100
dataset <- data.frame(gender=NULL,subject=NULL,outcome=NULL)
for (i in 1:n){
gender <- c(rep("m",5),rep("f",5))
subject <- letters[1:10]
outcome <- c(rbinom(5,1,0.6),rbinom(5,1,0.4))
dataset <- rbind(dataset,cbind(gender,subject,outcome))}
I am interested in the significance of
2007 Jun 05
1
Can I treat subject as fixed effect in linear model
Hi,
There are 20 subjects grouped by Gender, each subject has 2 tissues
(normal vs. cancer).
In fact, it is a 2-way anova (factors: Gender and tissue) with tissue
nested in subject. I've tried the following:
Model 1: lme(response ~ tissue*Gender, random = ~1|subject)
Model 2: response ~ tissue*Gender + subject
Model 3: response ~ tissue*Gender
It seems like Model 1 is the correct one
2012 Mar 10
0
Help with confidence intervals for gam model using mgcv
Hi,
I would be very grateful for advice on getting confidence
intervals for the ordinary (non smoothed) parameter
estimates from a gam.
Motivation
I am studying hospital outcomes in a large data set. The
outcomes of interest to me are all binary variables. The one
in the example here, Dead30d, is death within 30 days of
admission. Sexf is gender (M or F), Age is age in years at
the start
2012 Jul 21
2
car::Anova - Can it be used for ANCOVA with repeated-measures factors.
Dear list,
I would like to run an ANCOVA using car::Anova with repeated measures factors, but I can't figure out how to do it. My (between-subjects) covariate always interacts with my within-subject factors.
As far as I understand ANCOVA, covariates usually do not interact with the effects of interest but are simply additive (or am I wrong here?).
More specifically, I can add a covariate as
2004 Jul 13
0
an(other) anova question
[sorry if this arrives in duplo: it doesn't show up in the archives and it seems that the address I posted this from originally is no longer functional]
Hello,
I think I could do with some suggestions concerning the following problem.
I have data from a set of experiments on motion sickness where for each subject, I have
1) personal data like age and gender
2) a subjective rating of
2007 May 14
2
lmer function
Does anyone know if the lmer function of lme4 works fine for unbalanced designs? I have the examination results of 1000 pupils on three subjects, one score every term. So, I have three scores for English (one for every term), three scores for maths etc. However, not everybody was examined in maths, not everybody was examined in English etc, but everybody was in effect examined on four subjects. I
2008 May 09
1
lme() with two random effects
Hi all,
I have collected response time data from 178 participants ('sub') for
each combination of 4 within-Ss factors ('con','int','tone','cue').
Additionally, I have recorded the gender of each participant, so this
forms a between-Ss factor ('gender'). Normally this would be analyzed
using aov:
2016 Apr 17
0
Bug in by() function which works for some FUN argument and does not work for others
> On Apr 16, 2016, at 2:03 AM, Akhilesh Singh <akhileshsingh.igkv at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have got your core message, that it is my responsibility to determine whether any particular function in my version of R satisfies the language requirements at the time of your use. Jim Albert and Maria Rizzo must have used their code, which was permitted in the R-code