similar to: Help on choosing the appropriate analysis method

I have been doing some experiments with rsync on btrfs, a copy-on-write file system that is approaching or having just achieved production-ready status depending on your requirements. For my purposes the reliability appears by almost all accounts to be there, and the compression alone makes it very compelling. However the following two experiments show rsync behaviors that are disappointing to

Sorry for the limited detail here. To make matters worse, I don't have access to the machines in question any more. But perhaps someone would be able to give me some pointers to useful avenues to pursue. I'm trying to use Wine on FreeBSD (versions 4.2 and 4.4), to act as a Lightwave 5.6 render node, using Lightwave's ScreamerNet software. The software is for NT 4.0. This software

Greetings all, I see the following issue during snap creation under IO: Transaction commit calls btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes() that locks the delalloc_inodes list, fetches the first inode, unlocks the list, triggers btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work/btrfs_queue_worker for this inode and then locks the list again. Then it checks the head of the list again. In my case, this is always exactly the same

Until a weeks ago I used stata for everything. Now I'm learning R and trying to move. But, in this stage I'm testing R trying to do the same things than I used to do in stata whit the same outputs. I have a problem with the logit, applying weights. in stata I have this output . svy: logit bach job2 mujer i.egp4 programa delay mdeo i.str evprivate (running logit on estimation sample)

I have this problem. test <- svydesign(id=~1,weights=~peso) logit <- svyglm(bach ~ job2 + mujer + egp4 + programa + delay + mdeo + str + evprivate, family=binomial,design=test) then appear: Error in svyglm.survey.design(bach ~ job2 + mujer + egp4 + programa + : all variables must be in design= argument I don't know what this mean... Please help. Pablo. [[alternative HTML

While building a package, I see the following: * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE cheat.fit: no visible binding for global variable 'Zobs' plot.jml: no visible binding for global variable 'Var1' I see the issue has come up before, but I'm having a hard time discerning how solutions applied elsewhere would apply here. The entire code for both functions is below,

# R for Windows will not send your bug report automatically. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs at r-project.org # ###################################################### This report is joint from Richard Heiberger <rmh at temple.edu> and Burt Holland <bholland at temple.edu>. Burt Holland is the coauthor

Dear R-help, I have a question about pairwise.t.test and adjustment for multiple comparisons for paired data points. I have the following data: n=c("x", "x", "x", "x", "x", "x", "x", "x", "x", "x", "y", "y", "y", "y", "y", "y",

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@r-project.org # ###################################################### The multcomp functions work on "lm" objects as anticipated. They do not work on

Hi! I have been working several years with R but it's my first public question. I hope I'll be clear :) . This question is related to obtaining letter-based representation of non-parametric pairwise comparisons. I have a dataframe with this structure (but with quite more rows and cols): A B C factor 1 2 2 one 2 1 2 one 2 2 3 two 2 3 2 two 1 4 2 three 9 8 1 three I have no normality,

Hello- I have run an ANOVA on 4 treatments with unequal sample sizes (n=9,7,10 and 10). I want to determine where my sig. differences are between treatments using a Bonferroni test, and have run the code: pairwise.t.test(Wk16, Treatment, p.adf="bonf") I receive an error message stating that my arguments are of unequal length: Error in tapply(x, g, mean, na.rm = TRUE) :

NAME rq v2.3.2 SYNOPSIS rq (queue | export RQ_Q=q) mode [mode_args]* [options]* URIS http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/rq/ http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7922 DESCRIPTION ruby queue (rq) is a zero-admin zero-configuration tool used to create instant linux clusters. rq requires only a central nfs filesystem in order to manage a simple sqlite database as a distributed

HISTORY --- 2.3.3: - fixed bug in updater related to io files (see tmp_stdin in jobqueue.rb) - [IMPORTANT] removed feature where stdin jobs could contain comments (''#''). input lines are now taken literally __except__ blank lines, which are still ignored. - added ability to dump stdin/stdout/stderr for any job rq q stdout 42

Dear R-users I analysed the same data set by two different ways; analysis of covariance by using lm and anova functions and multiple comparison by using simtest function in the multcomp library. The output from the analysis of covariance is; > y<-lm(D~Cond+Q1,data=x) > anova(y) Analysis of Variance Table Response: D Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) Cond 2

Hi, I've got a problem building a contrast matrix for the Dunnet contrast in package multcopm. The following works fine: > summary(simtest(adiff ~ trial)) Simultaneous tests: Dunnett contrasts Data: adiff by trial Contrast matrix: trial1 trial2 trial3 trial4 trial5 trial2-trial1 -1 1 0 0 0 trial3-trial1 -1 0 1 0 0

Hi, all: Two examples are shown below. I want to use the multiple comparison of Dunnett. It succeeded in upper case "example 1". However, the lower case "example 2" went wrong. In "example 2", the function pmvt return NaN, so I cannot show this simtest result. Is there any solution? (I changed the variable "maxpts" to a large number in front of the

Hi group, I'm trying to do a Tukey test to compare the means of a factor ("treatment") with three levels in an lme model that also contains the factors "site" and "time": model = response ~ treatment * (site + time) When I enter this model in csimtest, it takes all but the main factor "treatment" as covariables, not as factors (see below). Is it

Hi,. We have 2 values (first formant F1, second formant F2) for a given phoneme for six languages. We want to see whether the languages are significantly different one from another for this given phoneme. We have done a manova on our data and it works well, but we doesn't allow us to see which pair of languages are different. If we have only one formant for the phoneme, we would use

Hi all, I've done some anovas, found some significance and proceeded to do the post hoc tests to determine the source of the significance. I used the multcmp package as suggested by Andy Liaw (thank you). I am, however, unsure how to interpret the results of the call to simint. Could someone help me with this? I've attached the code and the results it produced. There are 3 groups

Hi there guys this is my first post here, I thought I would inform everyone that I am currently building a screamernet controller in gtk+ I first got the idea after being interested in lightnet on win32, but since it was written in delphi, a language I care little about I went ahead with writing my own controller. Soon after win2k would crash almost every hour and unknown to me, breaking my