similar to: specify data frame by name

I am running into problems calling the library function nlme from within another function. Basically,the following function (with v a list containing data and initialization values) > testfunc function(dat=v) { test<-nlsList(result~a+(b-a)/(1+(conc/(c+z*cdiff))^d) |rep,start=dat$init,data=dat$mixeddat) return(nlme(test,random=b~1)) } produces the error message Error in eval(expr, envir,

So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported somewhere else? Thanks! Georg? ? ? Gesendet:?Dienstag, 09. Mai 2023 um 19:28 Uhr Von:?"Bert Gunter" <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> An:?"Georg Kindermann" <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> Cc:?"Rui Barradas" <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt>, r-help at r-project.org Betreff:?Re: [R] data.frame

I think the following may provide a clearer explanation: subs <- c(1,3) DFA <- data.frame(id = 1:3) ar <- array(1:12, c(3,2,2)) ## yielding > ar , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 2 5 [3,] 3 6 , , 2 [,1] [,2] [1,] 7 10 [2,] 8 11 [3,] 9 12 ## array subscripting gives > ar[subs,,] , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 3 6 , , 2

I really don't know. I would call it a request for extended capabilities of [.data.frame, rather than a feature or bug. But maybe wiser heads than mine who monitor this list can sort it out. -- Bert On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 8:52?PM Georg Kindermann <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> wrote: > So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported > somewhere else? >

Dear list members, when I create a data.frame containing an array I had expected, that I get a similar result, when subsetting it, like having a matrix in a data.frame. But instead I get only the first element and not all values of the remaining dimensions. Differences are already when creating the data.frame, where I can use `I` in case of a matrix but for an array I am only able to insert it in

# read.table is NOT part of the data.table package #library(data.table) DFM <- read.table( text= 'obs start end 1 2/1/2015 1/1/2017 2 4/11/2010 1/1/2011 3 1/4/2006 5/3/2007 4 10/1/2007 1/1/2008 5 6/1/2011 1/1/2012 6 10/5/2004 12/1/2004 ',header = TRUE, stringsAsFactors = FALSE) # cleaner way to compute D DFM$start <- as.Date( DFM$start, format="%m/%d/%Y" ) DFM$end

Since the number of choices is small (6), how about this? Starting with Jeff's initial DFM: DFM <- structure(list(obs = 1:6, start = structure(c(16467, 14710, 13152, 13787, 15126, 12696), class = "Date"), end = structure(c(17167, 14975, 13636, 13879, 15340, 12753), class = "Date"), D = c(700, 265, 484, 92, 214, 57), bin = structure(c(6L, 3L, 5L, 1L, 3L, 1L), .Label

Thank you Jeff and All, Within a given time period (say 700 days, from the start day), I am expecting measurements taken at each time interval;. In this case "0" means measurement taken, "1" not taken (stopped or opted out and " -1" don't consider that time period for that individual. This will be compared with the actual measurements taken (Observed-

Hi, This is my first post, sorry if not in the right format. I am stuck at a place where I have a code fragment that runs in normal gcc but fails when I give -fplugin=dragonegg.so extern int *testfunc(); extern __typeof (testfunc) testfunc __asm__ ("" "__GI_testfunc") __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))); extern __typeof(testfunc) __testfunc; extern __typeof

In my main R program, I have source("retaanalysis/Functions/doAirport.R") .... stuff to read data and calculate ads sapply(ads, function(x) {doAirport(x, base)} ) And doAirport has # analyze the flights for a given airport doAirport = function(df, base) { # Get rid of unused runway factor levels (from other airports) df$lrw <- drop.levels(df$lrw) # In gdata package #

I am trying to do parallel programming and I tried this library(doSNOW) library(foreach) testfunc<-function(x){ x<-x+1 x } noc<-2 cl <- makeCluster(do.call(rbind,rep(list("localhost"),noc)), type = "SOCK") registerDoSNOW(cl) clusterExport(cl=cl,c("testfunc.r")) testl<-foreach(pp=1:2) %dopar% { testfunc(pp) } And this works but if I try to

I have a need to call and pass arguments to nlme() from within another function. I use R version 1.8. I have found an apparent way to make this work, but I would appreciate some comments on whether this fix is really appropriate, or there is another way to do it that does not involve changing the source code. I don't have enough experience to start changing the sorurce code of a library

I suspect there may be a bug in base::rbind.data.frame Below there is minimal example of the problem: m <- matrix (1:12, 3) dfm <- data.frame (c = 1 : 3, m = I (m)) str (dfm) m.names <- m rownames (m.names) <- letters [1:3] dfm.names <- data.frame (c = 1 : 3, m = I (m.names)) str (dfm.names) rbind (m, m.names) rbind (m.names, m) rbind (dfm, dfm.names) #not working rbind

Hi lily, As I have no idea of what the "true record" is, I can only guess. Maybe this will help: # get some fairly distinct colors rainbow_colors<-rainbow(9) # this should sort the numbers in dfm$A dfm$Acolor<-factor(dfm$A) plot(dfm$B,dfm$C,pch=ifelse(dfm$DF==1,1,19), col=rainbow_colors[as.numeric(dfm$Acolor)]) legend("bottom",legend=sort(unique(dfm$A)),

Hi Jim, For true color, I meant that the points in the figure do not correspond to the values from the dataframe. Also, why to use rainbow(9) here? And the legend is straight in the middle, is it possible to reformat it to the very bottom? Thanks again. On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi lily, > As I have no idea of what the "true

Hi, I'm looking for a most efficient way to call an R function from C++ in a package. I know there are two functions (`R_forceAndCall` and `Rf_eval`) that can do the "call" part, but both are slow compared to calling the same function in R. I also try to use Rcpp and it is the worse one. Here is my test code: C++ code: ``` // [[Rcpp::export]] SEXP C_test1(SEXP f, SEXP x) { SEXP

For more than 10 records, how to reformat the colors? Also, how to show the first legend only, but at the bottom, while the second legend in your code is not necessary? In all, the same A values have the same color, but different symbols in DF==1 and DF==2. Thanks for your help. On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 9:28 AM, lily li <chocold12 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > For true color,

BLAST! LLVM mailing list headers are still royally screwed up... My message is below... On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Talin<viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, it's been a while since I have posted on this list, but I've > been continuing my work with LLVM and getting lots done :) > > One question I wanted to ask is whether anyone had any advice on how to >

Hello Group, I'm trying to learn R and am having a problem getting output from a function I'm trying to write. The problem is clearly one of scope, but I can't find the documentation that tells me how to get around the issue. Here is an example of my problem. testfunc<-function(x) { y<-10 print(y) print(x) } testfunc(4) The variables x and y are accessible during execution

First off, thanks for the help so far. >From what I have been able to tell, emitPrologue kicks in after the arguments for the function have been copied. For example, consider the function int testfunc( int foo, int bar ); Emitting assembly code from the llvm-gcc frontend in a small test program gives the following for the call to testfunc movl $1338, (%esp) movl $1339, 4(%esp) call