similar to: Ordered logit with polr won't match SPSS output

In Venables \& Ripley 3rd edition (p. 231) the proportional odds model is described as: logit(p<=k) = zeta_k + eta but polr apparently thinks there is a minus in front of eta, as is apprent below. Is this a bug og a feature I have overlooked? Here is the naked code for reproduction, below the results. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- version

Hi, I'm trying to fit a ordered logistic regression. The response variable (y) has three levels (0,1,2). The command I've used is: /ordlog<-polr(y~x1+x2+x3+x4, data=finalbase, subset=heard, weight=wt, na.action=na.omit) / (There are no NA's in y but there are NA's in X's) The error I'm getting is: /Warning messages: 1: non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in:

Dea all, Let's suppose I am studying a questionnaire survey and one of the questions has three ordered categorical responses (say, A, B and C). Eg result<-ordered(c(rep("A",12),rep("B",37),rep("C",6))) Assume the respondents are not grouped. The differences between the subsequent levels can be, I think, modeled with polr: fit<-polr(result~1) summary(fit)

Hi, I'm trying to fit a ordered logistic regression. The response variable (y) has three levels (0,1,2). The command I've used is: ordlog<-polr(y~x1+x2+x3+x4, data=finalbase, subset=heard, weight=wt, na.action=na.omit) (There are no NA's in y but there are NA's in X's) The error I'm getting is: Warning messages: 1: non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in:

I am new to R, ordered logistic regression, and polr. The "Examples" section at the bottom of the help page for polr<http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/MASS/html/polr.html>(that fits a logistic or probit regression model to an ordered factor response) shows options(contrasts = c("contr.treatment", "contr.poly")) house.plr <- polr(Sat ~ Infl +

Hi, I have a dataset that I am trying to analyze and plot as an ordered logistic regression (y = ordinal categories 1-3, x = continuous variable with values 3-9). First is a problem with cdplot: Produces a beautiful plot, with the "right" trend, but my independent factor values are transformed. The factor has values from 3-9, but the plot produces an x-axis with values from 20-140.

Hello everyone I am trying to fit an ordered probit/logit model for bank rating prediction. Besides polr() in MASS package which is not written especially for this as far as I know, do you know how else I can do this? I already found the modified polr () version on the Valentin STANESCU Enrst and Young Tel. 402 4000 ---------------------------------------------------------- The information

I'm trying to run an ordered logistic regression model. I've run the following code, but the output does not provide the p-values. Is there some command to include the p-values in the output. reg2 <- polr(trade1 ~ age2 + education2 + personal2 + economy2 + partisan2 + employment2 + union2 + home2 + market2 + race2 + income2) summary(reg2) Re-fitting to get Hessian# Call:

Hi (1)In polr(), is there any way to calculate a pseudo analogue to the R^2. Just for use as a purely descriptive statistic of the goodness of fit? (2) And: what are the assumptions which must be fulfilled, so that the results of polr() (t-values, etc.) are valid? How can I test these prerequisites most easily: I have a three-level (ordered factor) response and four metric variables. many

Dear R listers, I am learning the MLE utility optim() in R to program ordered logit models just as an exercise. See below I have three independent variables, x1, x2, and x3. Y is coded as ordinal from 1 to 4. Y is not yet a factor variable here. The ordered logit model satisfies the parallel regression assumption. The following codes can run through, but results were totally different from what I

I'm running polr() and getting warning messages from glm.fit(). It seems reasonable to use glm.control() to turn on the trace and follow what glm.fit() does when called by polr(); or is it? glm.control(maxit=10, trace=TRUE) polr(act~., data=mm) The glm.control() sets the trace TRUE, but there's no change in the output from polr(). Many thanks in advance for any help/pointers.

Dear community, I am currently trying to fit an ordinal logistic regression model with the polr function. I often get the same error message : "attempt to find suitable starting values failed", for example with : require(MASS) data(iris) polr(Species~Sepal.Length+Sepal.Width+Petal.Length+Petal.Width,iris) (I know the response variable Species should be nominal but I do as levels

Hi, I'm getting an error message using polr(): Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) : initial value in 'vmmin' is not finite The outcome variable is ordinal and factored, and the independant variable is continuous. I've checked the source code for both polr() and optim() and can't find any variable called

Hi everybody, i am like to do a ordered logistic model, but cant figure out which syntax / library fits best. i?ve answer possibilites in a matrix (-1 0 1 2 3), these are saved as factors. i guess i need something pretty basic. i tried VGAM, polr but received not what i wanted. Whicht library / package / syntax woud you prefer ? thx in advance! matthias

Hi, I am running an ordered logistic regression model with an interaction, using the polr command. I am trying to find a way to calculate the marginal effects and their significance in R. Does anybody have any suggestion? Thank you! Enrico [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, The problem is that when you try to use the function summary of a polr object in a function, it does not work. The problem is not related to the formula or the structure of data involved. It is probably related to the use of the function "vcov" in the code of summary for polr, and the iterative procedure to estimate the Hessian. Anyway, here there is an example extracted from

Hi, I obtained all the coefficients that I need from polr. However, I'm wondering how I can obtain the standard error of each estimated coefficient? I saved the Hessian and do something like summary(polrObj), I don't see any standard error like when doing regression using lm. Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you! - adschai

Dear all, To modelize the abundance of fish (4 classes) with a set of environmental variables, I used the polr and predict.polr functions. I would like to know how to bring the cumulated probabilities back to a discrete ordinal scale. For the moment I used the predict.polr function with the argument "class". Is there an other way? polrf <- polrf <- polr_mod(formula =

Dear Sir, I get an error message when I use polr() in MASS package. My data is "ord.dat". I made "y" a factor. y y1 y2 x lx 1 0 0 0 3.2e-02 -1.49485 2 0 0 0 3.2e-02 -1.49485 3 0 0 0 1.0e-01 -1.00000 4 0 0 0 1.0e-01 -1.00000 5 0 0 0 3.2e-01 -0.49485 6 0 0 0 3.2e-01 -0.49485 7 1 1 0 1.0e+00 0.00000 8 0 0 0 1.0e+00 0.00000 9 1 1 0

For the following model, library(vcd) arth.polr <- polr(Improved ~ Sex + Treatment + Age, data=Arthritis) summary(arth.polr) where Improved is an ordered, 3-level response I'm looking for a *simple* way to test the validity of the proportional odds assumption, typically done via a score test for equal slopes/effects over the predictors. I do find a po.test= option in the repolr package