similar to: LASSO: glmpath and cv.glmpath

Hi Claire, I'm replying and CC-ing to the R-help list to get more eyes on your question since others will likely have more/better advice, and perhaps someone else in the future will have a similar question, and might find this thread handy. I've removed your specific research aim since that might be private information, but you can include that later if others find it necessary to know

We have uploaded to CRAN a new version of glmpath, a package which fits the L1 regularization path for generalized linear models. The revision includes: - coxpath, a function for fitting the L1-regularization path for the Cox ph model; - bootstrap functions for analyzing sparse solutions; - the ability to mix in L2 regularization along with L1 (elasticnet). We have also completed a report that

We have uploaded to CRAN a new version of glmpath, a package which fits the L1 regularization path for generalized linear models. The revision includes: - coxpath, a function for fitting the L1-regularization path for the Cox ph model; - bootstrap functions for analyzing sparse solutions; - the ability to mix in L2 regularization along with L1 (elasticnet). We have also completed a report that

I'm trying to do LASSO in R with the package glmpath. However, I'm not sure if I am using the accompanying prediction function *predict.glmpath()* correctly. Suppose I fit some regularized binomial regression model like so: library(glmpath);load(heart.data);attach(heart.data); fit <- glmpath(x, y, family=binomial) Then I can use predict.glmpath() to estimate the value of the

Hi all, I'm relatively new to using R, and have been trying to fit an L1 regularization path using coxpath from the glmpath library. I'm interested in using a cross validation framework, where I crossvalidate on a training set to select the lambda that achieves the lowest error, then use that value of lambda on the entire training set, before applying to a test set. This seems to entail

We have uploaded to CRAN the first version of glmpath, which fits the L1 regularization path for generalized linear models. The lars package fits the entire piecewise-linear L1 regularization path for the lasso. The coefficient paths for L1 regularized glms, however, are not piecewise linear. glmpath uses convex optimization - in particular predictor-corrector methods- to fit the

We have uploaded to CRAN the first version of glmpath, which fits the L1 regularization path for generalized linear models. The lars package fits the entire piecewise-linear L1 regularization path for the lasso. The coefficient paths for L1 regularized glms, however, are not piecewise linear. glmpath uses convex optimization - in particular predictor-corrector methods- to fit the

Hi, I am new to model selection by coefficient shrinkage method such as lasso. And I became particularly interested in variable selection in Cox regression by lasso. I became aware of the coxpath() in R package glmpath does lasso on Cox model. I have tried the sample script on the help page of coxpath(), but I have difficult time understanding the output. Therefore, I would greatly appreciate if

Dear R-experts, Here below my R code with an error message. Can somebody help me to fix this error?? Really appreciate your help. Best, ############################################################ #?MSE CROSSVALIDATION Lasso regression? library(glmnet) ?

No error message shown Please include the error message so that it is not necessary to rerun your code. This might enable someone to see the problem without running the code (e.g. downloading packages, etc.) -- Bert On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 1:36?PM varin sacha via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > > Dear R-experts, > > Here below my R code with an error message. Can

The problem first appeared in R 2.6.1 and is still there in R 2.6.2 On Windows running R CMD check command for glmpath package fails. The reason seems to be that when R is running the examples file (glmpath-Ex.R), it skips about 50 lines and as a result gives a syntax error. I'm working with a modified version of the CRAN glmpath 0.94. My version happens to give a more clear example of a

Hi R-users! I am trying to learn how to use the glmpath package. I have a dataframe like this > dim(data) [1] 605 109 and selected the following > response <- data[,1] > features<-as.matrix(data[,3:109]) > mymodel <- glmpath(features,response, family = binomial) Error in if (lambda <= min.lambda) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE expected Reading the glmpath pdf, I

Dear R-experts, I really thank you all a lot for your responses. So, here is the error (and warning) messages at the end of my R code. Many thanks for your help. Error in UseMethod("predict") : ? no applicable method for 'predict' applied to an object of class "c('matrix', 'array', 'double', 'numeric')" > mean(unlist(lst)) [1] NA

For what it's worth it looks like spm2 is specifically for *spatial* predictive modeling; presumably its version of CV is doing something spatially aware. I agree that glmnet is old and reliable. One might want to use a tidymodels wrapper to create pipelines where you can more easily switch among predictive algorithms (see the `parsnip` package), but otherwise sticking to glmnet

Hi, When I install new packages from CRAN, I frequently find that some packages were missing from the download queue. For example, on one of my computer with R2.6.2, I can not find package glmpath from the download queue. On my other computer with R2.5.1, I could still find that particular package. What could be the reason for this? Is this computer related or R version related? I downloaded the

?s 20:12 de 23/10/2023, varin sacha via R-help escreveu: > Dear R-experts, > > I really thank you all a lot for your responses. So, here is the error (and warning) messages at the end of my R code. > > Many thanks for your help. > > > Error in UseMethod("predict") : > ? no applicable method for 'predict' applied to an object of class

Hi all, I am using glampath package for L1 regularized logistic regression. I have read the article " L1 regularization path algorithm for GLM" by park and Hastie (2006). One thing I can't understand that how to find best lambda for my prediction. I want to use that lambda for the prediction not the entire set. thanks. -- View this message in context:

Hi, I have a question about logistic regression in R. Suppose I have a small list of proteins P1, P2, P3 that predict a two-class target T, say cancer/noncancer. Lets further say I know that I can build a simple logistic regression model in R model <- glm(T ~ ., data=d.f(Y), family=binomial) (Y is the dataset of the Proteins). This works fine. T is a factored vector with levels cancer,

library(glmpath) data(heart.data) # heart.data is a list, $y a vector, $x a matrix data <- data.frame(x=I(heart.data$x), y = heart.data$y) > data[1:2,] x.1 x.2 x.3 x.4 x.5 x.6 x.7 x.8 x.9 y 1 160 12 5.73 23.11 1 49 25.3 97.2 52 1 2 144 0.01 4.41 28.61 0 55 28.87 2.06 63 1 > dimnames(heart.data$x)[[2]] [1] "sbp"

There may be benefits to having a machine learning method that explicitly targets covariate balance. We have experimented with optimizing the weights directly to obtain the best covariate balance, but got some strange solutions for simple cases that made us wary of such methods. Machine learning methods that yield calibrated probability estimates should do well (e.g. those that optimize the