similar to: factanal error

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "factanal error"

2009 Apr 20
0
system is exactly singular
Hi. I have a csv file. I imported it with mydata<-read.table("C:/dataForR/radiology/WordFrequency.csv", header=TRUE, sep=",") > dim(mydata) [1] 982 925 The first column had the doc numbers like doc1, doc2, etc. so I did mydataNum<-mydata[,-1] > dim(mydataNum) [1] 982 924 The second to last column was also not numeric and so I did >
2009 May 24
2
accuracy of a neural net
Hi. I started with a file which was a sparse 982x923 matrix and where the last column was a variable to be predicted. I did principle component analysis on it and arrived at a new 982x923 matrix. Then I ran the code below to get a neural network using nnet and then wanted to get a confusion matrix or at least know how accurate the neural net was. I used the first 22 principle components only for
2006 Mar 15
3
Help on factanal.fit.mle
Hi Can anybody please suggest me about the documentation of "factanal.fit.mle()" (Not factanal()------ searching factanal.fit.mle() in R always leads to factanal()). Is there any function for doing principal component factor analysis in R. Regards Souvik Bandyopadhyay JRF, Dept Of Statistics Calcutta University [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Jul 09
1
factanal frustration!
Hi. It seems that nearly every time I try to use factanal I get the following response: >faa2db1<-factanal(mretdb1,factors=2,method="mle",control=list(nstart=25)) Error in factanal(mretdb1, factors = 2, method = "mle", control = list(nstart = 25)) : unable to optimize from these starting value(s) > In the case cited above, mretdb1 is synthetic data created
2004 Jul 13
5
Help with factanal and missing values
Hi list, I'm performing a series of confirmatory factor analysis on different groupings of items from data collected with questionnaires. There are some missing values. For those sets with no missing values I call factanal(datamatrix,factors=n) where datamatrix is a table of all observations for the items under investigation. This call fails when there are missing values. help(factanal)
2008 Dec 01
1
factanal question
Dear R users: I'm wondering if it's possible to get the residual correlation matrix when using factanal. Since factanal assumes that the errors are normally distributed and independent (provided the factor model fits the data) this would be useful. Of course you would need to submit the data to the function to get the residuals (not just their correlation matrix), but it should be possible
2001 Nov 22
2
factanal {mva} question
Hello! I have a question about the factanal function. This function returns at the end test statistics like this: Test of the hypothesis that 4 factors are sufficient. The chi square statistic is 4.63 on 2 degrees of freedom. The p-value is 0.0988 Is it possible to get the chi square statistic and the p-value as variables, not the text on the screen? An object of class "factanal"
2009 Jan 30
1
Factor Analysis-factanal function
Dear friends, I'm using R to produce the following Factor Analysis: > matriz.cor<-hetcor(matrix(as.factor(data), ncol=variables, byrow=T))$correlations > factanal(x=data, factors=2, covmat=matriz.cor, scores='regression') Then the screen output shows the following message: Error en factanal(x = data, factors = 2, covmat = matrix, : requested scores without
2009 Nov 03
1
Passing Command to Optim in factanal
Hi, I am currently trying to execute the following command: f<-factanal(factors=k$Components$nparallel,covmat=m,n.obs=2287,rotation="varimax",control=list(opt=list(method=c("BFGS")))) but keep getting the error: L-BFGS-B needs finite values of 'fn' I can't figure out what I am doing wrong here, why isn't optim being told to use BFGS instead of L-BFGS-B...
2007 May 03
3
factanal AIC?
Dear list members, Could any expert on factor analysis be so kind to explain how to calculate AIC on the output of factanal. Do I calculate AIC wrong or is factanal$criteria["objective"] not a negative log-likelihood? Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel The AIC calculated using summary.factanal below don't appear correct to me: n items factors total.df rest.df model.df
2007 May 03
3
factanal AIC?
Dear list members, Could any expert on factor analysis be so kind to explain how to calculate AIC on the output of factanal. Do I calculate AIC wrong or is factanal$criteria["objective"] not a negative log-likelihood? Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel The AIC calculated using summary.factanal below don't appear correct to me: n items factors total.df rest.df model.df
2007 May 13
1
factanal
Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070513/f07553e9/attachment.pl
2007 Feb 06
3
How-To construct a cov list to use a covariance matrix in factanal?
Hi, I have a set of covariance matrices but not the original data. I want to carry out some exploratory factor analysis. So, I am trying to construct a covariance matrix list as the input for factanal. I can construct a list which includes the cov, the centers, and the n.obs. But it doesn't work. I get an error that says "Error in sqrt(diag(cv)) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical
2008 Jan 06
2
how to get residuals in factanal
In R factanal output, I can't find a function to give me residuals e. I mannually got it by using x -lamda1*f1 -lamda2*f2 - ... -lamdan*fn, but the e I got are not uncorrelated with all the f's. What did I do wrong? Please help. Yijun ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and
2006 Feb 24
1
Extracting information from factanal()
Dear list members, I apologize for putting this (probably) very basic question on the mailing list. I have scanned through the R website (using search) but did not found an answer. (code included below) A factor matrix is simply extracted (which can then subsequently be exported using write.table) by FACT$loadings[1:6,]. I would also like to specifically extract and export
2007 Oct 06
2
factanal: error message
Hi everyone, I'm running a factor analysis on a correlation matrix with 32 rows and columns. I get the following error when I issue the command sequence mich.fac1 <- factanal(michcor, factor=1) Error in solve.default(cv) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 3.24729e-18 I'd really appreciate an explanation for this error and a solution to the problem
2009 Jan 30
3
princomp - varimax - factanal
Hi! I am trying to analyse with R a database that I have previously analysed with SPSS. Steps with SPSS: Factorial analysis Extraction options : I select = Principal component analysis Rotation: varimax Steps with R: I have tried it with varimax function with factanal or with princomp...and the results are different of what I have with SPSS. I think that varimax function is incorporated in
2010 May 06
1
how to get components / factors in factanal / princomp not loadings
Dear all, i wonder if there?s a command to obtain the actual values of a principal component or a factor (not as.factor, but factanal) . test=princomp(USArrests, cor = TRUE) summary(test) just outputs, standard deviation, Prop of Variance and cumulative proportion of variance. test$loadings offers yet another proportion of variance scheme. why is that? Apart from that: Is there a
2001 Feb 09
1
starting values for uniquenesses in factanal()
Dear R-help, Using R 1.2.1 on Windows98 to run a factor analysis on a 64x150 matrix of data generated from a simulation model, factanal() reported that it failed to find a solution. Looking at the factanal code, I see the immediate condition that triggered the result: if (best == Inf) stop("Unable to optimize from these starting value(s)") So I am sure factanal() is giving
2012 May 28
3
Factanal fits
Greetings, all: I am using factanal in R. When I enter a matrix or a formula, the print method winds up with something like this: Test of the hypothesis that 6 factors are sufficient. The chi square statistic is 28.1 on 22 degrees of freedom. The p-value is 0.172 But when I enter a covmat, the print method winds up with something like this: The degrees of freedom for the model is 22 and the