Tom: The following messages are produced by both Shorewall & Shorewall6 when VERBOSITY=2 is specified in shorewall.conf and a capabilities file does not exist: Use of uninitialized value in string comparison (cmp) at /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Config.pm line 1612. Use of uninitialized value within %Shorewall::Config::capdesc in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Config.pm line 1599. Steven. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
Steven Jan Springl wrote:> Tom: > > The following messages are produced by both Shorewall & Shorewall6 when > VERBOSITY=2 is specified in shorewall.conf and a capabilities file does not > exist: > > Use of uninitialized value in string comparison (cmp) > at /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Config.pm line 1612. > > Use of uninitialized value within %Shorewall::Config::capdesc in concatenation > (.) or string at /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Config.pm line 1599. >SVN revision r9284 corrects this problem. If we create another 4.2.4 bug-fix release, we''ll include that change. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
Thats confirmed then.... Shorewall Guy is Tom !!! ;) ----- Original Message ----> From: Shorewall Guy <shorewalljunky@comcast.net> > To: Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 1:33:23 PM > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Minor Shorewall 4.2.4 issue. > > Steven Jan Springl wrote: > > Tom: > > > > The following messages are produced by both Shorewall & Shorewall6 when > > VERBOSITY=2 is specified in shorewall.conf and a capabilities file does not > > exist: > > > > Use of uninitialized value in string comparison (cmp) > > at /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Config.pm line 1612. > > > > Use of uninitialized value within %Shorewall::Config::capdesc in concatenation > > > (.) or string at /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Config.pm line 1599. > > > > SVN revision r9284 corrects this problem. If we create another 4.2.4 > bug-fix release, we''ll include that change. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> Thats confirmed then.... Shorewall Guy is Tom !!! ;)That is if you don''t find the assumption that <Shorewall Guy> is just one person too restrictive:-) Personally I prefer visualizing a "composite persona" of all the Shorewall developers/maintainers behind just the one handle. It seems to be a great way to enable them all to respond interchangeably and without a pecking order. thanks! -Chuck Kollars ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
u r right ----- Original Message ----> From: Chuck Kollars <ckollars9@yahoo.com> > To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 6:44:49 AM > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Minor Shorewall 4.2.4 issue. > > > Thats confirmed then.... Shorewall Guy is Tom !!! ;) > > That is if you don''t find the assumption that is just one person > too restrictive:-) > > Personally I prefer visualizing a "composite persona" of all the Shorewall > developers/maintainers behind just the one handle. It seems to be a great way to > enable them all to respond interchangeably and without a pecking order. > > thanks! -Chuck Kollars > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword