dear shorewall user, i plan to used fedora core 2 for bridging and firewall, but i read in previous posting don''t used kernel 2.6.12 causes broken kernel, and my question what recommended release of kernel can i used???. thank you eddy ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
stefanus wrote:> > dear shorewall user, > i plan to used fedora core 2 for bridging and firewall, but i read in > previous posting > don''t used kernel 2.6.12 causes broken kernel, and my question what > recommended release of kernel can i used???. > > thank you > > eddy > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
stefanus wrote:> > dear shorewall user, > i plan to used fedora core 2 for bridging and firewall, but i read in > previous posting > don''t used kernel 2.6.12 causes broken kernel, and my question what > recommended release of kernel can i used???.latest fedora core 2 kernel is not reported as broken.. or Im missing something? BTW.. fedora core 2 at this time is only supported by fedoralegacy..consider an upgrade.
Cristian Rodriguez wrote:> ... > BTW.. fedora core 2 at this time is only supported by > fedoralegacy..consider an upgrade.I can''t recommend this strongly enough. If you are using Shorewall, you are obviously wanting some security, and if you are wanting some security, you should use a distribution that''s currently supported. -- Paul Gear, Manager IT Operations, Redlands College 38 Anson Road, Wellington Point 4160, Australia (Please send attachments in portable formats such as PDF, HTML, or OpenOffice.) -- The information contained in this message is copyright by Redlands College. Any use for direct sales or marketing purposes is expressly forbidden. This message does not represent the views of Redlands College.
On 7/18/05, Cristian Rodriguez <judas_iscariote@shorewall.net> wrote:> stefanus wrote: > > but i read in previous posting > > don''t used kernel 2.6.12 causes broken kernel, and my question what > > recommended release of kernel can i used???. > > latest fedora core 2 kernel is not reported as broken.. or Im missing > something?There was a report on the list a few days ago that 2.6.12 was severely broken. Does anyone know the details... or how to know when the 2.6 branch is "safe" for firewall applications again? -Tom ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
Tom Lisjac wrote:> On 7/18/05, Cristian Rodriguez <judas_iscariote@shorewall.net> wrote: >>stefanus wrote: >>>but i read in previous posting >>>don''t used kernel 2.6.12 causes broken kernel, and my question what >>>recommended release of kernel can i used???. >>latest fedora core 2 kernel is not reported as broken.. or Im missing >>something? > > There was a report on the list a few days ago that 2.6.12 was severely > broken. Does anyone know the details... or how to know when the 2.6 > branch is "safe" for firewall applications again?It''s only 2.6.12, not all 2.6 kernels, and it''s only in a few limited scenarios - please check the list archives for exact details. -- Paul Gear, Manager IT Operations, Redlands College 38 Anson Road, Wellington Point 4160, Australia (Please send attachments in portable formats such as PDF, HTML, or OpenOffice.) -- The information contained in this message is copyright by Redlands College. Any use for direct sales or marketing purposes is expressly forbidden. This message does not represent the views of Redlands College.
thank''s for all i try to use fedora core 2 release and pending to upgrade the original kernel from fedora core 2 bests regards, eddy Paul Gear writes:> Tom Lisjac wrote: >> On 7/18/05, Cristian Rodriguez <judas_iscariote@shorewall.net> wrote: >>>stefanus wrote: >>>>but i read in previous posting >>>>don''t used kernel 2.6.12 causes broken kernel, and my question what >>>>recommended release of kernel can i used???. >>>latest fedora core 2 kernel is not reported as broken.. or Im missing >>>something? >> >> There was a report on the list a few days ago that 2.6.12 was severely >> broken. Does anyone know the details... or how to know when the 2.6 >> branch is "safe" for firewall applications again? > > It''s only 2.6.12, not all 2.6 kernels, and it''s only in a few limited > scenarios - please check the list archives for exact details. > > -- > Paul Gear, Manager IT Operations, Redlands College > 38 Anson Road, Wellington Point 4160, Australia > (Please send attachments in portable formats such as PDF, HTML, or > OpenOffice.) > -- > The information contained in this message is copyright by Redlands > College. Any use for direct sales or marketing purposes is expressly > forbidden. This message does not represent the views of Redlands > College.------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
dear shorewall user,
i have 12 public IP from my ISP and in my machine runing fedora core 2 and
shorewall version 2.4.2. my question is:
1. i want DNAT 202.xxx.xxx.xx1 to private IP 192.168.0.10
....
202.xxx.xxx.x12 to Private IP 192.168.0.12
in this scenario, i put 5 NIC in my linux box and make one NIC have 3 ip
alias. (eth0,eth1,eth2,eth3 With Public IP) and eth4 local IP
but after shorewall is start i seen DNAT not working.
can some one give me god solution???.
best regards,
eddy
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing
& QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf