Shorewall users - Feb 2003 - Webmin Shorewall Patch

My description of the incorrect use of the term ''SNAT'' on the
Static NAT
Webmin page was apparently misunderstood. Attached is a patch against the 
Webmin-1.070 Shorewall module that corrects this problem and also adds the 
''DNAT-'' action for rules.

To apply the patch, you will need the ''patch'' utility:

cd <webmin shorewall directory - on RedHat, /usr/libexec/webmin/shorewall>
patch -p1 < <the attached patch>

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep   \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline,    \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Webmin.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2406 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/attachments/20030222/f2f369bd/Webmin.obj

--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 05:58:46 PM +0000 Peter SJF Bance 
<Minstrel@minstrel.org.uk> wrote:
> No attachment (but then I''m sure 300 other people have already
told
> you!)... Unless my ISP helpfully filtered it out :o(
No -- it is the list server that filtered it :-( I''ve attached it so
you
should get it in this reply.
>
> Is this patch available on a site somewhere?
>
It will be available in:

ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Webmin
http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Webmin

In 40 minutes or so (next rsync).

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep   \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline,    \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Webmin.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2406 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/attachments/20030222/498e5205/Webmin.obj

Tom Eastep wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Saturday, February 22, 2003 05:58:46 PM +0000 Peter SJF Bance 
> <Minstrel@minstrel.org.uk> wrote:
> 
>> No attachment (but then I''m sure 300 other people have already
told
>> you!)... Unless my ISP helpfully filtered it out :o(
> 
> 
> No -- it is the list server that filtered it
Just to clarify -- the shorewall-announce list did not receive the 
attachment; the shorewall-users list now has received it twice :-(

Not my day...

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline,     \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ teastep@shorewall.net