My description of the incorrect use of the term ''SNAT'' on the Static NAT Webmin page was apparently misunderstood. Attached is a patch against the Webmin-1.070 Shorewall module that corrects this problem and also adds the ''DNAT-'' action for rules. To apply the patch, you will need the ''patch'' utility: cd <webmin shorewall directory - on RedHat, /usr/libexec/webmin/shorewall> patch -p1 < <the attached patch> -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Webmin.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2406 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/attachments/20030222/f2f369bd/Webmin.obj
Tom Eastep
2003-Feb-22 10:07 UTC
[Shorewall-users] RE: [Shorewall-announce] Webmin Shorewall Patch
--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 05:58:46 PM +0000 Peter SJF Bance <Minstrel@minstrel.org.uk> wrote:> No attachment (but then I''m sure 300 other people have already told > you!)... Unless my ISP helpfully filtered it out :o(No -- it is the list server that filtered it :-( I''ve attached it so you should get it in this reply.> > Is this patch available on a site somewhere? >It will be available in: ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Webmin http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Webmin In 40 minutes or so (next rsync). -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Webmin.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2406 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/attachments/20030222/498e5205/Webmin.obj
Tom Eastep
2003-Feb-22 10:43 UTC
[Shorewall-users] Re: [Shorewall-announce] Webmin Shorewall Patch
Tom Eastep wrote:> > > --On Saturday, February 22, 2003 05:58:46 PM +0000 Peter SJF Bance > <Minstrel@minstrel.org.uk> wrote: > >> No attachment (but then I''m sure 300 other people have already told >> you!)... Unless my ISP helpfully filtered it out :o( > > > No -- it is the list server that filtered itJust to clarify -- the shorewall-announce list did not receive the attachment; the shorewall-users list now has received it twice :-( Not my day... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net