search for: zrusin

...rying to pass multidimensional arrays to JIT where one of the helper functions should convert them to LLVM vector types. Unfortunately passing a multidimensional array seems to crash the JIT and I'm not sure why. As an example, we have a file with two silly C functions: http://ktown.kde.org/~zrusin/llvm/llvm.c Both clang (latest svn) and llvm-gcc (4.0.1) produce basically the same ll code looking like this: http://ktown.kde.org/~zrusin/llvm/llvm.ll And now calling those functions from a cpp file looking like this: http://ktown.kde.org/~zrusin/llvm/test.cpp gives proper results for the single...

...rdware. That's a much easier problem, and not useful beyond current-gen cell-phones. > anyway, yes: what's possible, and where can people find out more > about how gallium3d uses LLVM? Ask the Mesa/Gallium folks, we really just get the occasional bug report. Personally, I follow zrusin.blogspot.com for my Gallium3d news. and (for those people not familiar > with 3D), why is the shader program not "static" i.e. why is a > compiler needed at runtime at _all_? (if there's an answer already > somewhere on a wiki, already, that'd be great). > > a...

On Nov 3, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > In other words, are there some successful code "generators" (ie high > level compilers for either functional or logical languages) which > actually did switch from generating C code and compiling it (with GCC) > to generating LLVM assembly and compiling it (with LLVM)? What are the > concrete improvements (in

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > The way in which Gallium3D targets LLVM, is that it waits until it receives > the shader program from the application, then compiles that down to LLVM IR. > That's too late to start synthesizing hardware (unless you're planning to > ship an FPGA as the graphics card, in which case reprogramming

Hello All, I suspect that LLVM performs very well, mostly because I respect a lot his main architect Chris. However, I have no ideas about concrete performance of the LLVM compiler, in particular speed of the compilation process to achieve small optimisation (mostly something equivalent to gcc -fPIC -O1 in terms of code quality). The intent is to generated .so files (I want to avoid the

Hey, I'm contemplating adding llvm-gcc as a core platform to Qt, meaning we'd release Qt unless we would make sure it compiles and works with llvm-gcc but I have some problems with making it work cleanly so I just wanted to ask a few simple questions. The problems refer to llvm and llvm-gcc from respectively cvs/svn which, I'm assuming, means upcoming 2.0 release. 1) we added a