search for: zol

...ion about the state of ZFS in Ubuntu. There are 2 Linux compatible implementations of ZFS, zfs-fuse (http://gitweb.zfs-fuse.net/) and ZFS on Linux (http://zfsonlinux.org/). ZFS-fuse is in the official Ubuntu repos but is rather outdated and almost all development has stopped. ZFS on Linux (aka ZoL) is an open source but license incompatible kernel module that is under active development and released as source packages for most major distos. There is a ppa for Ubuntu here: https://launchpad.net/~zfs-native/+archive/stable ZoL is actively used in various NAS distros, as well as things like...

I am trying to use gee() to calculate the robust standard errors for a logit model. My dataset (zol) has 195019 observations; winner, racebl, raceas, racehi are all binary variables. ID is saved as a vector of length 195019 with alternating 0's and 1's. I get the following error message. I also tried the same command with corstr set to "independence" and got the same er...

> > Btw, right now, we've just built a new server as Ubuntu, because my > manager wants to use it to test zfs, including its ability to a) act as a > RAID, directly, without an underlying RAID, and b) encrypt the whole thing > natively. > ZFS on linux was originally an EL project. Ubuntu support came later.

...> There are 2 Linux compatible implementations of ZFS, zfs-fuse > (http://gitweb.zfs-fuse.net/) and ZFS on Linux > (http://zfsonlinux.org/). > > ZFS-fuse is in the official Ubuntu repos but is rather outdated and > almost all development has stopped. > > ZFS on Linux (aka ZoL) is an open source but license incompatible > kernel module that is under active development and released as > source packages for most major distos. There is a ppa for Ubuntu > here: https://launchpad.net/~zfs-native/+archive/stable > > ZoL is actively used in various NAS distros,...

...implementations of ZFS, zfs-fuse > > (http://gitweb.zfs-fuse.net/) and ZFS on Linux > > (http://zfsonlinux.org/). > > > > ZFS-fuse is in the official Ubuntu repos but is rather outdated and > > almost all development has stopped. > > > > ZFS on Linux (aka ZoL) is an open source but license incompatible > > kernel module that is under active development and released as > > source packages for most major distos. There is a ppa for Ubuntu > > here: https://launchpad.net/~zfs-native/+archive/stable > > > > ZoL is actively used...

On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Blake Hudson <blake at ispn.net> wrote: > > I've never used ZFS, as its Linux support has been historically poor. When was the last time you checked? The ZFS-on-Linux (ZoL) code has been stable for years. In recent months, the BSDs have rebased their offerings from Illumos to ZoL. The macOS port, called O3X, is also mostly based on ZoL. That leaves Solaris as the only major OS with a ZFS implementation not based on ZoL. > 1) A single drive failure in a RAI...

...ants to use it to test zfs, including its ability to a) act >>> as a RAID, directly, without an underlying RAID, and b) encrypt the >>> whole thing natively. >> >> ZFS on linux was originally an EL project. Ubuntu support came later. >> > I've been running ZoL on CentOS for years. Wonderful stuff. SysAdmin's > dream, although we keep all ZoL boxes off any public access and update on > a carefully tested schedule to ensure that no RPM version weirdness > happens. Ok, how's it scale on large filesystems? My manager was running some tests...

I think it may have something to do with my disks being encrypted. This issue happened after updating systemd to version 236, ZoL to 0.7.4 and kernel to 4.14. I have always mounted the pool manually by first opening LUKS-encrypted disks and after that issuing zpool import tank. Is there any way to still use systemd to manage smbd or do I have to just always start it manually? This is how the pool has been set up: root at...

...22:39:56 punishedkorppu smbd[27893]: [2018/01/08 22:39:56.075343, 0] ../source3/smbd/service.c:774(make_connection_snum) Jan 08 22:39:56 punishedkorppu smbd[27893]: canonicalize_connect_path failed for service rex, path /tank/rex The system in use is Debian Buster with Samba 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 and ZoL 0.7.4-1 from Debian repo. Selinux is disabled and apparmor too. Any ideas what might be wrong with this setup? --- information --- The mountpoint really is /tank/rex according to zfs list. It can also be accessed by any user locally. NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT t...

...L/CentOS? Just curious, because I'd love to return to > CentOS/SL next time I build large file servers. > > As an aside, I have used only WD Black and WD RedPro drives for > RAID, and not had any issues. Green drives are scary :-) > > Chuck Licensing, IMO. Redistributing ZoL is likely fraught with a bit of legal peril, or at best, technical peril if you want to try and skirt the legal edges. Oracle is notoriously litigious and having a target liked Red Hat would probably have their lawyers whetting their chops. Ironically, btrfs was also an Oracle thing -- in that Ch...

...use my > > manager wants to use it to test zfs, including its ability to a) act as a > > RAID, directly, without an underlying RAID, and b) encrypt the whole thing > > natively. > > ZFS on linux was originally an EL project. Ubuntu support came later. I've been running ZoL on CentOS for years. Wonderful stuff. SysAdmin's dream, although we keep all ZoL boxes off any public access and update on a carefully tested schedule to ensure that no RPM version weirdness happens.

Hi. I'm sharing a ZFS (ZoL) directory through Samba. Right now I have it set up so my user has full RWX access to everything, but for security reasons I'd like to only allow myself to copy and read files and create and list directories, but make it so once something is created I can't modify it in any way other t...

On 2014-09-15 , kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote: > > So the ZoL folks want one more feature before calling it 1.0; otherwise > they believe it's production ready. Only your own testing can convince > you that it's truly production ready. > > --keith > That's encouraging news, something I've been looking forward to. FWIW, I'...

When trying to play vorbis or opus files that have large cover sizes >1MB on android 8.0 built in player, they fail to play. Removing the cover allows them to play.  Has anyone encountered this before or know if it is a known android or opus/vorbis bug?

...hccm.default, but that required an lm object. Is there some way to do a similar operation for a glm object? x <- hccm.default(glm(winner ~ racebl + racehi + raceas + inchi + incmed + edhs + edcol + edba + agec1 + agec4 + sex + margin + regla + regbay + regsc + libcon+ pdem + poth, data = zol, family = binomial, weights = NULL)) Error in hccm.default(glm(winner ~ racebl + racehi + raceas + inchi + : requires an lm object > Thanks, Nirmala Ravishankar ********************************************************************** Nirmala Ravishankar First Year Graduate Student, Gov...

On 2/18/2015 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > You might be a candidate for LVM integrated raid. It uses the md > kernel code on the backend, but it's all LVM tools to create, manage > and monitor. The raid level is defined per LV, instead of all LV's in > a VG inheriting the underlying raid. It supports all levels of raid > including 5/6. ... ... > ... > ... ... btrfs

...lved in any way, you will have problems, zfs uses >> nfs4acls, you could try adding 'nfs4acl_xattr' to the 'vfs objects' line. > > this goes in the right direction, but it's zfsacl for ZFS. :) oh, no, hold on, this is about ZFS on Linux I guess? In that case, iirc ZoL uses POSIX ACls and doesn't support NFS4 ACLs, so you shouldn't need any extra VFS modules for ACLs -- POSIX ACLs work out of the box. Sorry for the confusion! :) -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba...

Il 25-06-2018 23:59 Yves Bellefeuille ha scritto: > I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't > tried): > > http://zfsonlinux.org/ > https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS > > to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page: > > https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalResources/Repositories/ > > unless someone with

...oubleshoot problems. When I see quotes like this [1] on the product's WIKI: "The parity RAID code has multiple serious data-loss bugs in it. It should not be used for anything other than testing purposes." I'm reluctant to store anything of value on it. Have you considered using ZoL? I've been using it for quite some time and haven't lost data. - Ryan http://prefetch.net [1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID56 On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: > On 09/07/2017 01:57 PM, hw wrote: >> >> >&...

...ed lstat calls. As a matter of fact, I can't see the path > to my share anywhere in the trace at all. This is where my problem is a bit > different than yours. > > SELinux does not report any errors. So I don't think that's to blame? > I'm running Fedora 30 server and ZoL 0.8.1 Is 'smbd' running ? Jeremy was replying to the OP (who was running Samba as a standalone server) but the thread seemed to come to an abrupt end without conclusion, but, after rereading the the thread, one thing seemed a possible problem. In the OPs 'smbd' systemd file the...