search for: zhhb

hi again :) On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:57 AM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > hi john, > > thanks very much, i will try it out. > > --best regards > ether > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:03 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> ether zhhb wrote: >> >>> hi all, &g...

hi eli, i delete the cache of cmake, and reconfigure the project, but HAVE_GRAPHVIZ still undefine. do you know what i should do? thanks very much. regards --ether On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:32 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i just install gv and dotty for windows, but i cant see any way to >> configure it using cmake. >> >> is Viewing graphs under windows supported? and how could i configure it? > > LLVM doesn't use a...

...present in llvm release <= 2.6, but they are straight forward to apply. Best regards, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Javier Martinez Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 7:57 AM To: ether zhhb Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Viewing graphs while debugging code under windows? Hi Ether, I work under Windows and am able to view graphs generated by LLVM. I haven't tried generating and viewing dog graphs while debugging but I hope this helps. What I do is to invo...

...n click on run. I set the layout engine to 'dot' and the output file type to 'png'. The rest of the GVedit settings are the default. Click ok on the settings page and you're done. You should see a .png file in the temp directory. Thanks, Javier On 11/30/2009 10:29 PM, ether zhhb wrote: > hi eli, > > i delete the cache of cmake, and reconfigure the project, but > HAVE_GRAPHVIZ still undefine. do you know what i should do? thanks > very much. > > regards > --ether > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Eli Friedman<eli.friedman at gmail.com>...

hi all, i have some thing not so sure about "scope" of llvm passes: suppose i have a function pass PassF and a BasicBlock analysis pass PassB. if i want to use the analysis result of PassB for a BasicBlock in PassF, i think i can create PassB in runOnFunction of PassF, and call runOnBasicBlock manually to get the result: PassB pb; //create a PassB //we also need consider the analysis

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > that's because FunctionPass implement the "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" > function, but others not. > > so, is there any special reason that only "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" is > allow? > There is no reason to not all...

Devang Patel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> that's because FunctionPass implement the "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" >> function, but others not. >> >> so, is there any special reason that only "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" is >> allow? &gt...

ether zhhb wrote: > hi John, > > sorry for reply so late. > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu > <mailto:criswell at uiuc.edu>> wrote: > > Devang Patel wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb >...

hi John, sorry for reply so late. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Devang Patel wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> that's because FunctionPass implement the "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" >>> function, but others not. >>> >>> so, is there any special reason that only "addLowerLevelRequiredPas...

hi every one, i have a very strange cpu that have 24-bits reigsters, but i cant see i24 in machine value type? and if defining it as MVT others will be ok? thank you very much

On Nov 13, 2009, at 6:45 AM, ether zhhb wrote: > hi every one, > > i have a very strange cpu that have 24-bits reigsters, but i cant see > i24 in machine value type? and if defining it as MVT others will be > ok? You'd want to add a new i24 MVT enum. -Chris

hi all, i just install gv and dotty for windows, but i cant see any way to configure it using cmake. is Viewing graphs under windows supported? and how could i configure it? regards --ether

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:32 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > hi all, > > i just install gv and dotty for windows, but i cant see any way to > configure it using cmake. > > is Viewing graphs under windows supported? and how could i configure it? LLVM doesn't use a specific search path to find the...

Hello Ether, I think it is referring to the Value class (captial V) whose documentation is found at http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Value.html . It has to be a pointer because the Value class is a parent class to many many child classes. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thu, December 3, 2009 7:45:42 PM > Subject: [LLVMdev] "SrcValue is not a pointer?" assertion in SelectionDAG::getSrcValue > > hi, > > i am building selectionDAG...

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:12 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Fwd: Adding multiples-of-8 integer types to MVT To: ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:24 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > ya, when you targeting some backend like FPGA, you are able to meet a > integer with any bitwitdh. That is a *very* good point.  Since most FPGA boards are configurable right d...

On May 6, 2010, at 6:32 PM, ether zhhb wrote: > As the comment said: > /// The IndVarSimplify pass transforms loops to have a form that > this > /// function easily understands. > > you could try -indvars. After adding -indvars to the opt command, getTripCount still returns null. I suppose it's possible,...

hi, i am building selectionDAG by my own code, but got a assertion fail said "SrcValue is not a pointer?". but since the comment above the SrcValueSDNode said: "SrcValueSDNode - An SDNode that holds an arbitrary LLVM IR Value." why the llvm value of SrcValueSDNode must be with PointerType? is that assertion necessary? thanks a lots. regards --ether

On 03/23/2011 09:58 PM, ether zhhb wrote: > hi raghesh, > > >> >> 5. Porting Polly to Various architectures. >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> Currently Polly generates everything as 64 bit integer, which is >> problamatic for embedded platforms. >> > you...

hi John, On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:27 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > ether zhhb wrote: > >> hi John, >> >> sorry for reply so late. >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu<mailto: >> criswell at uiuc.edu>> wrote: >> >> Devang Patel wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 1...

...in most processors do not simply subtract and test the most significant bit; they compute what the sign of the difference would be in extended precision. On Apr 17, 2010, at 1:00 PM, llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > Message: 13 > Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:17:54 +0800 > From: ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] SCEV expression for ICmpInst > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: > <s2w5f72161f1004170717re1325ffdr53b6b7308215b3fa at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-...