search for: zettai

help compiling Opus! i'm stuck at opusfile. configure says i don't have openssl package installed but Debian 9.4 thinks i do. this Debian only have Opus 1.2-alpha2 package, so i need to compile Opus by myself. seems even Debian developers having trouble compiling latest versions of Opus, what chances do i have to succeed? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:40 PM ongaku zettai <sergeinakamoto at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > i have over 30GB of Opus music and noticed that > solo instrumentals and solo vocals uses more bitrate > than full-mixes. > Here's example where Opus 1.3 used 190 kbps for > piano solo and 159 kbps for full-mix. > (--bi...

Hello! Trying to compile, build, install and run Opus. My config: Ubuntu console (Windows 10 app). First problem, configure says openssl is missing. My system says that i have openssl already. Which openssl does it need? Using aptitude, i've installed everything with openssl name in it. That's tons of files and gigabytes of data. But it worked somehow. Second problem, flac-1.3.2 -

Hello. Me again. Have you tried to encode piano solo? Noticed high bitrate Opus gave? And there's also artefact at 15kHz which wasn't in the original audio. Visible with Spek program. Download FLAC and Opus both files, new link: http://www.filedropper.com/example_3 FLAC full: 1084 kbps; FLAC solo: 465 kbps. with --bitrate 160: Opus full: 158 kbps; Opus solo: 190 kbps. Included also Spek

tracked down the spectogram atrefact source; it comes from the resampler. so it's not really a bug, just a nuisance. let's hope in the future Opus will be able to save bitrate on simple audio parts as all other lossy and lossless codecs do. i think opus decreasing bitrate only when it thinks that audio is too complex for human to hear difference. that's a bad attitude.

> Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 18:43:40 -0800 > From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe at xiph.org> > To: opus at xiph.org > Subject: Re: [opus] Impossible two bugs in Opus > > ongaku zettai wrote: > > i think opus decreasing bitrate only when it thinks that audio > > is too complex for human to hear difference. that's a bad attitude. > > That is literally how lossy audio compression is supposed to work. no, i was expecting audio codec give more bitrate to comple...

I''ve got a mailer that works -- about every other time. Authentication fails the other half of the time. There doesn''t seem to be any particular pattern to it -- work once, fail once, work three times, fail twice, .... For example, here''s one attempt from my development.log: Sent mail: Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:50:57 -0500 From: someone <someone@something.org>

Hi folks, Last night and this morning i''ve hacked up a quick web site for coordinating our development work based on Drupal (http://drupal.org). You can find it at: http://shorewall.dyndns.org I''ve put a few ideas in there - feel free to use the comments or sign up for an account and create your own pages (particularly in the two books about development and web site work).

1) thanks, i've installed libssl1.0-dev and compling process continued. 2) compiled opus passing --disable-shared to configure b/c shared cannot find library (i'm new to Linux) 3) compiled opus 1.3-beta-40 successfully! it is faster than 32 bit Windows version! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello. i have over 30GB of Opus music and noticed that solo instrumentals and solo vocals uses more bitrate than full-mixes. Here's example where Opus 1.3 used 190 kbps for piano solo and 159 kbps for full-mix. (--bitrate 160 --music) Download example piano solo 15MB: https://mega.nz/#!wLBz3AZT!YmqQMkAGqc4kGHumNWZAfB7Cmcf4vFlHpT6IiiAVCNA FLAC uses 2 times less bitrate for solo than full-mix