search for: z16

...in row 4 and 5 respectively. when I?m trying using below logic, I?m getting warning message. Can anyone help me out on this. X: Summary G Y R T Accts 582 644 0 1226 AcctCov 230 165 0 395 Cov% 40 26 0 32 UnCov% 60 74 0 68 EqVol11$MM8.5 10.6 0 19.1 Using this logic: Z16[5,2:5]<-paste("$",Z16[5,2:5],sep="") Z16[3,2:5]<-paste(Z16[3,2:5],"%",sep="") Z16[4,2:5]<-paste(Z16[4,2:5],"%",sep="") Getting this Warning: In `[<-.factor`(`*tmp*`, iseq, value = c(3L, 1L, 2L, 4L, NA))...

Hi Friends, I'm new to R ,I have a data frame Z16 which is genarated from another data frame, and I want to add ?%? & ?$? in row 4 and 5 respectively. when I?m trying using below logic, I?m getting warning message. I'm using R 2.14.2 Version Can anyone help me out on this. Note: Initially i used tranfrom function to do some calculation...

...l_common.c +++ b/src/nv_accel_common.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ nouveau_allocate_surface(ScrnInfoPtr scrn, int width, int height, int bpp, tile_mode = 0x00; if (usage_hint & NOUVEAU_CREATE_PIXMAP_ZETA) - tile_flags = 0x1100; /* S8Z24 */ + tile_flags = (bpp == 16) ? 0x0100 : 0x1100; /* Z16 : Z24S8 */ else tile_flags = 0xfe00; @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ nouveau_allocate_surface(ScrnInfoPtr scrn, int width, int height, int bpp, tile_mode = 0; if (usage_hint & NOUVEAU_CREATE_PIXMAP_ZETA) - tile_flags = 0x22800; + tile_flags = (bpp == 16) ? 0x26c00 : 0x22800; e...

...+ Z5 + Z6 + Z7 + Z8), data = testsamp) I have no problems with this. However, if the set of random effects has a dimension of 30, then the lmer call is: fit2<-lmer(LogY ~ WYear + (1 | Site) + (1 | Year) + (1 | Z1+Z2 + Z3 + Z4 + Z5 + Z6 + Z7 + Z8 + Z9 + Z10 + Z11 + Z12 + Z13 + Z14 + Z15 + Z16 + Z17 + Z18 + Z19 + Z20 + Z21 + Z22 + Z23 + Z24 + Z25 + Z26 + Z27 + Z28 + Z29+ Z30), data = testsamp) In this case, I get an error because the name "Z1+Z2 + Z3 + Z4 + Z5 + Z6 + Z7 + Z8 + Z9 + Z10 + Z11 + Z12 + Z13 + Z14 + Z15 + Z16 + Z17 + Z18 + Z19 + Z20 + Z21 + Z22 + Z23 + Z24 + Z25 +...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92306 Bug ID: 92306 Summary: GL Excess demo renders incorrectly on nv43 Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95095 Bug ID: 95095 Summary: NV46 (G72) Full screen artifacts in Freespace 2 SW OT mod Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau

A little patch that makes the nv50 mesa driver use the correct GPU values for the matching depth formats. There doesn't seem to be Z16, but I added Z32_FLOAT to show the tile_flags the various formats need in the page tables. There'd also be Z32_FLOAT_S8_UNORM (0x19, tile flags 0xe000), but that's not yet defined in the pipe formats header, and I actually don't know if it's even possbible to define that cleanly th...

...might expect, making format == GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT go to the fallback in st_TexSubImage at HEAD fixes it too, but I don't think that's desired. This ends up taking the blit_3d path in nv50_surface.c. Of note is that on nva0+, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT16 seems to work fine, which is also where the Z16_MSX_LSR storage type appeared, so probably not a coincidence. But a bit surprising is that on nva0+ it does work for Z16, but still not for the other ones. Makes me think this is a storage type/tiling-related situation. The blit code has this: /* Since shaders cannot export stencil, we cannot copy...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100177 Bug ID: 100177 Summary: [GM206] Misrendering in XCOM Ennemy Within Product: Mesa Version: 17.0 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:

...G80_SURFACE_FORMAT_BGR5_X1_UNORM_UNKFC 0x000000fc +#define G80_SURFACE_FORMAT_BGRX8_UNORM_UNKFD 0x000000fd +#define G80_SURFACE_FORMAT_BGRX8_UNORM_UNKFE 0x000000fe +#define G80_SURFACE_FORMAT_Y32_UINT_UNKFF 0x000000ff +#define G80_ZETA_FORMAT_Z32_FLOAT 0x0000000a +#define G80_ZETA_FORMAT_Z16_UNORM 0x00000013 +#define G80_ZETA_FORMAT_S8_Z24_UNORM 0x00000014 +#define G80_ZETA_FORMAT_Z24_X8_UNORM 0x00000015 +#define G80_ZETA_FORMAT_Z24_S8_UNORM 0x00000016 +#define G80_ZETA_FORMAT_Z24_C8_UNORM 0x00000018 +#define G80_ZETA_FORMAT_Z32_S8_X24_FLOAT 0x00000019 +#define G80_ZET...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73358 Priority: medium Bug ID: 73358 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [nv34] adobe flash + firefox -> DATA_ERROR QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: ronald645 at gmail.com

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...91 0 0.03 224757 0 0.02 224757 z10.ll 11 687914 0 0.06 687880 0 0.06 687880 z11.ll 6 201196 0 0.03 201162 0 0.02 182154 z12.ll 5 1299812 0 0.11 1299778 0 0.11 1299778 z13.ll 4 350569 0 0.03 350535 0 0.03 350535 z14.ll 1 819014 0 0.06 818980 0 0.07 818980 z15.ll 10 235166 0 0.03 235132 0 0.03 235132 z16.ll 4 216158 0 0.02 216124 0 0.02 216124 z17.ll 4 71142 0 0.01 71108 0 0.02 71108 z18.ll 5 586018 0 0.05 585984 0 0.05 585984 z19.ll 5 904309 0 0.08 904275 0 0.08 904275 z20.ll 2 777109 0 0.06 777075 0 0.06 777075 z21.ll 1 443111 0 0.04 443077 0 0.04 443077 z22.ll 12 1244660 0 0.09 1244626 0 0.10 12...