search for: yhdezalvarez

...h in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope that surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the variables as if they were /inside/ of the loop and not creating this extra scope. Frowny. -J -------------------------------------------------- From: "Yanko" <yhdezalvarez at gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:12 AM To: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: [LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while (obviously)gcc compiles it fine ... > makes the code compilable by MS C++. But as a curiosity (and I really > don't know the answer...

...ectly, does not emit a compilation error. And while we are on the subject, gcc is also wrong on this one: if (int x=0) { int x=0; // error: redeclaration, but gcc does not emit any errors. } -Argiris > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Yanko" <yhdezalvarez at gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:12 AM > To: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: [LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while > (obviously)gcc compiles it fine > > ... > >> makes the code compilable by MS C++. But as a curiosity (an...

Taken from tools/llvmc2/CompilationGraph.cpp: ... for (typename C::const_iterator B = EdgesContainer.begin(), E = EdgesContainer.end(); B != E; ++B) { const Edge* E = B->getPtr(); ... MS C++ compiler (VS 2008) gives: ... CompilationGraph.cpp ..\..\..\llvm\tools\llvmc2\CompilationGraph.cpp(58) : error C2371: 'E' : redefinition; different basic types

...;m not sure the linux c++ abi can implement all .net exception handling features like filter clauses). So to make this work with llvm, we would have to throw out mono's current exception handling system, which we are not keen to do. Zoltan 2009/7/17 Yanko Hernández <yhdezalvarez at gmail.com> > Sorry for being a newbie on the matter, but could someone explain the > comment (in response to: "Considering it [LLVM] supports three other > languages with try/catch clauses just fine (C++, Ada, and now, Java), > I think it would be incorrect to say "it i...

Sorry for being a newbie on the matter, but could someone explain the comment (in response to: "Considering it [LLVM] supports three other languages with try/catch clauses just fine (C++, Ada, and now, Java), I think it would be incorrect to say "it is not able to support some of the features"."): ------------------------------ The issue is that the exception handling as

Looks like LLVM support in Mono has matured to the point they're willing to advertise it: http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2009/Jul-16.html Paul PS Zoltan, sorry if I stole your opportunity to break the news :)

...d while we are on the subject, gcc is also wrong on this one: > > if (int x=0) { > int x=0; // error: redeclaration, but gcc does not emit any errors. > } > > > -Argiris > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "Yanko" <yhdezalvarez at gmail.com> > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:12 AM > > To: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Subject: [LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while > > (obviously)gcc compiles it fine > > > > ... > > > >> makes the code compilab...

...And while we are on the subject, gcc is also wrong on this one: > > if (int x=0) { > int x=0; // error: redeclaration, but gcc does not emit any errors. > } > > > -Argiris > >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Yanko" <yhdezalvarez at gmail.com> >> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:12 AM >> To: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Subject: [LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while >> (obviously)gcc compiles it fine >> >> ... >> >>> makes the code compilable by MS...

Hello: I'm loosing my mind trying to classify my outgoing messages with sieve-test (2.0.9, centos 6.4). It came to the point I think it's not even possible with a sieve script. I need to classify my outgoing messages in three folders: 1- To my department (@dept.example.com) 2- To my company (@example.com, @anyotherdept.example.com) (anyotherdept.example.com as in a way to say "any