search for: ygk

It's a pity I don't know how to re-create the issue. While there are 1-2 crashed clients in total 120 clients every day. Below is gdb result: (gdb) where #0 0x0000003267432885 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x0000003267434065 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x000000326746f7a7 in __libc_message () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3 0x00000032674750c6 in malloc_printerr () from

I wanna make a method that can deep copy an ActiveRecord to a new one, but it seems a little difficult , how to do it? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe

...nd skills and we have gained much experience in communicating with many different Chinese suppliers. We are not only find out the problems but also offer solutions or suggestions to solve it. we can provide the purchasing service in china for you! Contact information: Email:hopeinspection-9Onoh4P/yGk@public.gmane.org ( We will reply you within half an hours) My skype:judy19882012(Please add me) Phone:008618868604300(Call me at any time) http://inspection.alibaba.com/providers/Peter-Luan_100305801.html -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are sub...

Hello? We have used glusterfs3.4 with the lasted samba-glusterfs-vfs lib to test samba performance in windows client. two glusterfs server nodes export share with name of "gvol": hardwares: brick use a raid 5 logic disk with 8 * 2T SATA HDDs 10G network connection one linux client mount the "gvol" with cmd: [root at localhost current]# mount.cifs //192.168.100.133/gvol

...tWV6c6n/blKnUtZH72eeOjClLqWAUS5CqWbyrbtOvM z1PQPB1N0lpl1gtZWN2S7KsY2FraXLGDWJZcJmd7RWy3r58Jc5uzr5vuELTnUNMFriFE312/ +SNm1BXU311Bff7qj0D70EWf9QtPFaB1/z8suEc1kSHDdTkDWQTt+a2y83Rq32B/+mREU6Wu iprcMotiz/FwVPJou+blmiyzaMNRydFHWVJ7pRWVcrYmF7Q3fSfCfAXuuyxORTY1fT/CyZbU C3ryvEH7bDCQ4VsDti8RL9dA3YJ29eb2oH0SnMyGKxUoqxAmNfNqw4s3JbuKBue9WRemzgPt 9T4S5ZrXrkMwi16XRvFDYF3Q/rU6XZfUjfBN3xWuwA02XGlqamrQvgVov8LhQYC6heiH65j2 LwHtk3BuCVypw568hLXgXIP2haC9iLQbtDc1NTU1NTVtCtpHYersWcc8Plw+RKfHVGDYJKhY C+4uB+2THK41055IvhLPH7F0P6B90qJWbNdCacyOac81WATta+l0xYOnmpqampqaGrSPHvlY 2XB38AJLXADpxp9Mfg7IjajukY+T2/0qKDHZelmXzzzQXilnr...

Hi, Referring to the link http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking, the scenario described for the routed mode, explains that "Host has public IP and virtual machines have static public IPs. But one can't use bridged networking, since provider accept only packets from the MAC address of the host" Can someone explain to me why doesn't the switch accept the packets from

Hi, in bridge mode all the guests and hosts should be in the same subnet always ? Thanks Kumar On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Laine Stump <laine@laine.org> wrote: > On 05/20/2016 03:21 AM, Gk Gk wrote: > > Hi, > > Referring to the link http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking, > the scenario described for the routed mode, explains that > > "Host

Hi, I am referring to the 'Routed Mode' section just under the section 'Other virtual network switch routing types' in the URL ' http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking#Routed_mode'. In the above link, for routed mode, it is stated that 'In this mode all virtual machines are in a subnet routed through the virtual switch.' Can anyone explain to me, if the

hello , i am is Ruby greenhorn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi, First I appreciate for you all, with your last week's points mentioned in the problem I meet with slow samba vfs write performance. Then I use fastcopy software to test windows clients write performance, it tells the same performance with iozone rewrite results, reach 450MB/s each client. Then I use the same smb.conf test read performance, it shows slow read performance compare with

Hi all How to ensure the new data write to other bricks, if one brick offline of gluster distributed volume ; the client can write data that originally on offline bricks to other online bricks ; the distributed volume crash, even if one brick offline; it's so unreliable when the failed brick online ,how to join the original distribute volume; don't want the new write data can't