search for: yarv

Hi, I am trying to use ruby int an embedded web server. The environment does not have the luxury of CGI or WebBrick. I find limited documentation on how to get this to work. As a test program on windows, I tried the code in the section below. I have the issues. 1. Is public/dispatch.rb the right script to invoke a rails app? If so, what is the right way to invoke dispatch.rb? 2.

I''ve been reading, hearing, and looking at blogs that state Ruby on Rails is rather slow. Coming from a VB 6 world (thank you Microsoft for killing VB because VB.NET is NOT VB) I was always told that VB was a toy or too slow. Now, I''ll easily tell you that yes VB was not a great language. It had it''s share of warts, like a lot of other languages I might add, but

...ed exceptions as #kill, like JRuby does, so the worker threads will not finish serving the client and _then_ exiting, but will be kill''ed in the middle of the request. (at the bottom of mongrel.rb): http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/lib/mongrel.rb According to some docs of Jruby and YARV, we should rely on ''thread safety'' of these methods (including #critical and #kill). Thoughts? btw, merry christmas to everybody! :-D -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate t...

I see that lighttpd 1.3.14 supports SCGI. lighttpd 1.3.14 - 2005-06-15 18:10 Changes ------- * added SCGI support via mod_scgi * added hash-based and round-robin load balancing to mod_proxy * fixed range requests larger than 2Gb * fixed compilation on Solaris * fixed endless loops in mod_fastcgi, mod_cgi and mod_proxy * fixed handling of URIs for ''+'' and

Hello all- Forgive me if this has been discussed before- I searched the archives and didn''t see anything. Anyway, here it goes- There is a lot of talk lately about Comet-based applications- that is, web apps that hold connections to the server open for a very long time, to effectively achieve realtime data push from the server to the browser. Currently, there are a few web

Hey so, People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0? It''s not like 1.9 is a production release. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

...s every time. * In the production environment, the same anonymous module is used for the same application. So required_dependency loads libraries only at once. * Rails configurations such as ActiveRecord::Base.colorize_logging are reset on each request. This hack is just a workaround until YARV supports multiple VM instances. We can get it in the near future, I hope. Shugo

...expect speaking time to be 35-minutes with 10-minutes of Q&A.) Here are a few topics to give you some ideas: - Design and coding techniques - Testing tools and techniques - Developer productivity tips and tools - Patterns and best practices for developing Ruby code - MRI, Rubinius, JRuby, YARV - Rails, Rail3, Merb, Sinatra, Ramaze, Waves, etc - Ruby in the Enterprise - Ruby in Small Business - Ruby internals, meta programming - Data filtering, reporting, parsing You name it. If it is Ruby related, we want to hear from you. Please submit your proposal at: http://spreadsheets.goo...

...abstract for a presentation in the Ruby and Rails devroom. Topics include, but are not limited to: * Ruby o Tutorials (installation, basic Ruby, advanced Ruby, metaprogramming, DSLs, testing, design patterns, Rubygems, C-extensions, ...) o New developments (Ruby 1.9, Ruby 2.0, YARV, JRuby, Rubinius, IronRuby, ...) o Important/interesting libraries (your own, other''s, HOWTOs, demos, ...) o Technical showcases (interesting applications of Ruby, challenges, solutions, ...) o ... * Rails o Tutorials (installation, basic/advanced web...

On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:06 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Does ruby compile ruby code to native instructions and execute them? No. Ruby is an interpreted language. The latest version has a VM that it targets -- YARV -- but it still does not compile to native like, say, a JIT would. > Otherwise it probably means that llvm-gcc miscompiled something. This is what I'm guessing at this stage. It is, however, only a guess. And given that GCC raw -- the "native" compilation platform for Ruby -...

Hi Michael, thanks for trying out LLVM! "The bad news comes with the make test-all results. Less than two minutes into the comprehensive test suite the LLVM-GCC version of Ruby 1.9 dies with the following message: "Illegal instruction (core dumped)". Later it tells me the test failed with "error 132". This is, as you can see, not a very useful message since it's not

I have been comparing R with other languages and systems. One peculiar feature of R is there is no scalar. Instead, it is just a vector of length one. I wondered how much performance penalty this deign cause, particular in situations with many scalars in a program. Thanks. Jason Liao, http://www.geocities.com/jg_liao Associate Professor of Biostatistics Drexel University School of Public

Hi I have some questions regarding threads in Mongrel and Rails. According to the FAQ: "Ruby on Rails is not thread safe so there is a synchronized block around the calls to Dispatcher.dispatch. This means that everything is threaded right before and right after Rails runs. While Rails is running there is only one controller in operation at a time." Isn''t this going

http://snakeratpig.blogspot.com/2008/02/alternative-compiler-suites.html Executive summary: LLVM-GCC was consistently faster and its output consistently faster than plain old GCC when compiling and using Ruby 1.9. Both compilers failed spectacularly on the full regression suite, but GCC lasted longer and did more tests before exploding. If I could find a comprehensive Erlang testing suite,

Francis, I read in the list archives back that a future EventMachine release will support epoll on Linux (i.e., it''s in the trunk). Better still, is there a possibility that EM will rely on libevent so that it will be architecture independent (i.e. epoll on Linux, kqueue on FreeBSD/Mac OS X, /dev/poll on Solaris)? This is how memcached is implemented, and it would be helpful to be able

Hi, It would be nice if Mongrel would do multiapps in one Mongrel instance. For the moment, I have one Mongrel for each app of my server, each on a different port. For example: http://server:8080/app1 http://server:8080/app2 instead of: http://server:8080/ http://server:8081/ Is that planned? Thanks. -jec -- JeSC - Software et Consulting Jean-Eric Cuendet Ing?nieur HES en

Hi all, Just wondering... Are there any plans to include i18n support in Rails anytime soon? I guess this is about the only feature I''m realy missing in Rails. Any thoughts? Regards, Harm de Laat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060130/63681052/attachment.html

The agile book says "You can inspect variables, set values, add other breakpoints, and generally have a good time". This is very sweet and totally useless. For example, I want to see the session variable, the cookies variable and so on. These names are unknown. I think I guess that the things that are available depend on where you put the breakpoint() call. I''ve tried a

Well now that I got your attention.... Why RoR sucks: 1. It''s smarter than me. Just when I think I''ll have to do some mundane thing (like I use to in PHP or ASP), I find out RoR does it already for me. 2. It takes about half or less code to put my stuff together in RoR than it did in PHP, ASP, ASP.NET, etc. It seems so unnatural that I can have a method with only 4 lines

I''ve read a ton of comparisons that compare one framework to another, and one language to another. There''s so much conflicting advice out there that it''s hard to know what is best. Did I make the right choice choosing Rails for my first web project? I guess we''ll see. The only reason why I''m hesitant is that a lot of the big name sites use php