search for: xxx1

I am thinking of having a pots line with multiple numbers on it, and having Asterisk dial my desk if the outside caller dials xxx-xxx-xxx1, and ring another desk if the person called xxx-xxx-xxx2, etc. Can Asterisk do this? -- Jeff Ramsey MIS Administrator Tubafor Mill, Inc.

...my target system is a Dell Inspiron XPS Gen 2 Laptop. I am trying to to create a bootable USB Key from the VMware ESXi 3 ISO, which is an ISOLINUX bootable PROBLEM: I have a usb key (256MB) formatted FAT16 with the first and only partition marked bootable. I've mounted the ISO and /dev/XXX1 I've copied the contents of the ISO to /dev/XXX1 via mount points I've renamed isolinux.cfg to syslinux.cfg on /dev/XXX1 I've run syslinux /dev/XXX1 followed by cat mbr.bin > /dev/XXX The target system, which recognizes that there is a USB device attached on boot and tries...

...t; > If we can not use coxph model, do we need to rearrange the dataset to make it something like: > > ID time age drug censor Year Overall Condition > > 1 1 5 46 1 0 1990 XXX > > 2 1 5 35 1 0 1991 XXX1 > > 3 1 6 35 1 1 1992 XXX2 > > 4 2 5 46 1 0 1990 XXX > > 5 2 6 35 1 1 1991 XXX1 > > 6 3 6 35 1 1 1990 XXX2 And then run logistic regres...

Hi, all. I want to get the single bitcode file after link-time optimizations. After doing some searching, I get commands as follows: *llvm-gcc -O4 -c xxx.c -o xxx.o llvm-gcc xxx.o -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-debug -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm -lm -o xxx* But these command don't give me the wanted bitcode file. The used version of llvm is 2.7. Do you have any idea of this problem or any other

Hello list, I formatted a 64MB usb stick with this command 'mkfs.ext2 -b 1024 /dev/XXX1' , to copy a file of 9230653440, but when it reached 7921295360, it gave input/ output error and the file is not copied. How should this be done?

...ical processor has 12 virtual processors (0-11) x86 (AuthenticAMD 100F91 family 16 model 9 step 1 clock 2100 MHz) AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6172 [ Socket: G34 ] # zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT rpool 928G 13.5G 914G 1% 1.00x DEGRADED - xxx1 14.5T 1.41T 13.1T 9% 4.54x ONLINE - xx2 7.25T 109G 7.14T 1% 1.00x ONLINE - # zpool status pool: rpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action:...

...dns proxy = No hosts allow = 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.3 192.168.0.4 [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/%U writeable = Yes browseable = No [Eleven] comment = xxx path = /ftpserver/Userz/Eleven/Ontwerp_Site/ valid users = xxx xxx1 xxx2 writeable = Yes create mask = 0765 [ftp] comment = FTP SERVER path = /glftpd/site/glftpd/ writeable = Yes guest ok = Yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba valid users = xxx xxx1 xxx2 print...

...anyway? Is there maybe a new encryption taking place which the old DC does not know? I am really stuck. Thanks in advance, Holger testparm on the client rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[xxx1]" Processing section "[xxx2]" Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions [global] workgroup = Test server string = Samba Server Version %v interfaces = lo, eth0, 127.0.0.1 security =...

...enough (and a lot simplier), as those hosts don't need to do anything but to setup a revert port forwarding rule, and are bound to a very limited shell. My (now useless) /home/host_controler/.ssh/authorized_keys file (build on a cron run) was like : command="limited_shell.sh --host_id=XXX1 $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND" ssh-rsa pubkey of host 1" command="limited_shell.sh --host_id=XXX2 $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND" ssh-rsa pubkey of host 2" command="limited_shell.sh --host_id=XXX3 $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND" ssh-rsa pubkey of host 3" ... Thank you very much for...

...nherit acls = yes" appears to have no effect. Relevant section of smb.conf -- [DIG] path = /home/DFT writeable = yes browseable = no create mask = 660 directory mask = 2770 inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes valid users = xxx, xxx1 I have tried various other options such as "map acl inherit = yes", "dos filemode = yes" to no avail. Setting a default acl for the primary group has no effect. Thanks in advance. Mark Kerman

Hi, I have a small problem with the function split() and would appreciate your help. I have a table called ?XXX? with 2 columns and 49 rows. The 49 rows belong to 8 different levels (electrode1, ...,electrode8). I want to split the table always at the row where ?electrode1? starts again so that I can export 7 individual dataframes (numbered ?dataframe1? to ?dataframe7?) which contain always

...XXX *) @@ -3384,6 +3398,7 @@ let print_python_binding name { args; ret } = | BytesIn (n, len) -> pr " \"y#\"" | Int n -> pr " \"i\"" | Opaque n -> pr " \"O\"" + | ReadStatus n -> pr " XXX1" | String n -> pr " \"s\"" | UInt64 n -> pr " \"K\"" (* The following not yet implemented for callbacks XXX *) @@ -3398,6 +3413,7 @@ let print_python_binding name { args; ret } = | ArrayAndLen (UInt32 n, _) -...

...3398,7 @@ let print_python_binding name { args; ret } = > | BytesIn (n, len) -> pr " \"y#\"" > | Int n -> pr " \"i\"" > | Opaque n -> pr " \"O\"" > + | ReadStatus n -> pr " XXX1" > | String n -> pr " \"s\"" > | UInt64 n -> pr " \"K\"" > (* The following not yet implemented for callbacks XXX *) > @@ -3398,6 +3413,7 @@ let print_python_binding name { args; ret } = > | Ar...

I've mentioned this topic before (in fact, the idea of adding NBD_CMD_FLAG_DF was first mentioned at [1]), but finally finished enough of an implementation to feel confident in posting it. I'd still like to add something under examples/ that uses the new API to implement strict checking of a server's structured replies read implementation (ensure that a server never sends data after