Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "xmplay".
Did you mean:
omplay
2006 May 30
2
Winamp v5.22 / oddcast / aac+
...t byte for byte to get around this blocking they seem
to be doing.
Nullsoft must think they are big enough now to enforce their ideals on
their customers. In the meantime, I'm considering removing Winamp from
my list of compatible players on my website. They can use Windows Media
Player, XMPlay, Foobar2000, etc.
Regards,
Ross.
2016 Jun 23
1
FLAC__SSE_OS change
lvqcl wrote:
...
> P.S. I wonder what's the point to test OS SSE support in 2016? I believe
> that
> users of Windows 95 and Windows NT4 don't expect new software to work on
> their
> OSes.
I do (although I am often disappointed).
Regards,
Martin
--
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
2004 Aug 06
2
IceS 2.0a - Extended sleep requested
I've just set up a new collection of streams and one
of them is having problems. The clients connecting to
this one stream only last a few minutes before getting
kicked off. I don't know where to start looking for
the problem.
I'm running Mandrake 8.1 with Libshout2.0, IceS 2.0a
and Icecast2 downloaded from cvs only a few days ago
(with the mentioned os.h error included ;-)
I get the
2004 Aug 06
4
IceS 2.0a - Extended sleep requested
...entry is written, I was hoping that
someone with better (ie some) knowledge of the code
would point me to the problem area rather than me
having to wade through it all myself.
I have made unusual encode settings, but it still used
a standard oggenc build. I've listened to the streams
with both xmplay and winamp now to see if the stream
dropping was a winamp only issue and found that xmplay
also drops the 25kbs one, but not at the same point
that winamp does. The server also doesn't warn it
booted the client so I'm guessing buffer issues for
the stream problem.
What the "extended s...
2006 May 30
4
Winamp v5.22 / oddcast / aac+
...et around this blocking they seem
>to be doing.
>
>Nullsoft must think they are big enough now to enforce their ideals on
>their customers. In the meantime, I'm considering removing Winamp from
>my list of compatible players on my website. They can use Windows Media
>Player, XMPlay, Foobar2000, etc.
>
>Regards,
>Ross.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Icecast mailing list
>Icecast@xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>
>_______________________________________________
>Icecast mailing list
>Icecast@xiph....
2004 Dec 22
0
Re:Re :ihave a problem
...raid that I don?t point? to the right problem
I need a solution for all case , user don?t need install anything and dont
know that player is default
just click and go that is the problem , how to do?
i think in a java player , minimal ,lite o something similar
for windows users i put in the page a xmplay with a .pls pointing tu server,
is a temporary solution
for linux users xmms is the most used and dont have problem
i dont think for mac users (i am sorry , accept sugerencias)but a java was
my intention
in this need help
exist a solution, sure ,have a lot streams in the net and no everybody
dr...
2006 May 30
0
Winamp v5.22 / oddcast / aac+
...utput byte for byte to get around this blocking they seem
to be doing.
Nullsoft must think they are big enough now to enforce their ideals on
their customers. In the meantime, I'm considering removing Winamp from
my list of compatible players on my website. They can use Windows Media
Player, XMPlay, Foobar2000, etc.
Regards,
Ross.
_______________________________________________
Icecast mailing list
Icecast@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
2006 May 30
0
Winamp v5.22 / oddcast / aac+
...round this blocking they
>seem to be doing.
>
>Nullsoft must think they are big enough now to enforce their ideals on
>their customers. In the meantime, I'm considering removing Winamp from
>my list of compatible players on my website. They can use Windows
>Media Player, XMPlay, Foobar2000, etc.
>
>Regards,
>Ross.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Icecast mailing list
>Icecast@xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>
>_______________________________________________
>Icecast mailing list
>Icecast@xiph....
2006 Oct 03
1
How do I list in YP? icecast2 ices0
...streaming at low bitrates. It sounds like crap at anything below
112k. Whereas 28k AAC+ sounds pretty good in hifi stereo, and this
bitrate means it's available to dial-up internet users.
Here is my 28k AAC+ world music stream if you are interested. It requires
Winamp v5 or Foobar2000 or XMPlay or Screamer or VLC for Mac/Linux
http://soulfm.stationplaylist.com/listen.m3u
Ross.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Campbell" <rob@rob-campbell.com>
To: <icecast@xiph.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Icecast] How do I list in YP? icecast...
2006 May 31
0
Winamp v5.22 / oddcast / aac+
...round this blocking they
>seem to be doing.
>
>Nullsoft must think they are big enough now to enforce their ideals on
>their customers. In the meantime, I'm considering removing Winamp from
>my list of compatible players on my website. They can use Windows
>Media Player, XMPlay, Foobar2000, etc.
>
>Regards,
>Ross.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Icecast mailing list
>Icecast@xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>
>_______________________________________________
>Icecast mailing list
>Icecast@xiph....
2006 Oct 03
3
How do I list in YP? icecast2 ices0
I can understand wanting to boost the adoption of Xiph codecs, but I think restricting the directory to vorbis streams only will not help this endeavour. I can imagine it will just piss a lot of people, including myself, and give Xiph a bad name.
I get very few listeners of my AAC+ stream now since this occured. The restriction is not an insentive to switch to Ogg Vorbis at all. The incentive