search for: xeis

...9uqQgHWPt/ufI3S9kLXzVpZejx1FolNNvkASTRV mtCp9g31CGDxfEzuf19ip8dVJkRDJdFpFYkjgFUHXDfm20ub7Louf89d/0Zi/7fq FUMC/RVUCu0CALlyXrr1YtuIVS9kR/8Jb459uA9L9lHXAkPXzHO0zOxu8F/WuNae uMC9DoVEMlJ9Pf4o2PV7PvHjiXTXaASAspUfBJ3uWHARhxopc6vaPhglux2QIwIf 4e/8DgH2Cnzwd1Dkv+OOEcNzVx2M/02zg9DcBXogU19dE1NPNtj/pDk5oRgRpNaF XEiS+vUV55+5XfukodkbI5LZ9RKUunWJXK+4EZWi0wEET5yVNzLoCBfX5o4Na1G4 fPJUJAAsX0MnBy/nzw0bmkItPixD7uOWOb79BS+q3HDcZUyUYokXI6OBFtF8doAw eL2+tvefC1dJWxoZez98XvvFaOQXfMCIv38A5EuOFwnkMCKFnQ4nGbJtFv+Mbzhw 9YB5qeHIFfpCJUA6s0ilS/cJvPMmH60BNCoej8PrEV02hxoqUgtcwbmM+r/JsX0X 7/Lz7IASBKbs0aGSh5HHiwfkGT40KeOY33VNULBALuHF...

On 06/12/2016 05:21 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > $ scp svr2:/path/to/source svr1:/path/to/dest > > You'll get twice the network traffic since the copy is running on your > workstattoin (or whatever). > > On 12/06/16 15:40, H wrote: >> I normally use ssh to log into a remote server, change directory >>

...x1FolNNvkASTRV > mtCp9g31CGDxfEzuf19ip8dVJkRDJdFpFYkjgFUHXDfm20ub7Louf89d/0Zi/7fq > FUMC/RVUCu0CALlyXrr1YtuIVS9kR/8Jb459uA9L9lHXAkPXzHO0zOxu8F/WuNae > uMC9DoVEMlJ9Pf4o2PV7PvHjiXTXaASAspUfBJ3uWHARhxopc6vaPhglux2QIwIf > 4e/8DgH2Cnzwd1Dkv+OOEcNzVx2M/02zg9DcBXogU19dE1NPNtj/pDk5oRgRpNaF > XEiS+vUV55+5XfukodkbI5LZ9RKUunWJXK+4EZWi0wEET5yVNzLoCBfX5o4Na1G4 > fPJUJAAsX0MnBy/nzw0bmkItPixD7uOWOb79BS+q3HDcZUyUYokXI6OBFtF8doAw > eL2+tvefC1dJWxoZez98XvvFaOQXfMCIv38A5EuOFwnkMCKFnQ4nGbJtFv+Mbzhw > 9YB5qeHIFfpCJUA6s0ilS/cJvPMmH60BNCoej8PrEV02hxoqUgtcwbmM+r/JsX0X > 7/Lz7IASBKbs0aGSh5HHiwfk...

And route print? Do you have any servers on the WAN? (or is everyone connecting to the servers THROUGH the WAN?) Can you see the samba machines at all in network neghborhood? What happens when you type in the UNC of a samba server manually? (i.e. \\SAMBASERVERNAME) I hope I can help you, and I'm trying, but I'm not a samba guru. -Dan PS. Please change your email type to PLAIN TEXT from

Hi all, enclose a patch to improve the "btrfs subvolume find-new" command. This is a RFC because it is not finished, but it is an usable state and may be discussed. The aim of this patch is: - take in account not only an update of the extent but also an update of the inode and xattr (which includes the acl) - extract the generation reference number directly from a snapshot The new

Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40, Geb.

I will get a smbd process started. (If this is incorrect please let me know ;) But this morning I did a quick ps -ax on my machine and found *two* smbd -D in the process list. But as far as I know there is no connection to the samba server right now. I did connect to and disconnect from the server yesterday but I would think that that connection would have been released by now. Can anyone

However.... When I try the command nmblookup -M LINUXSERVER querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1

When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1 localhost

Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA dev people.. Regards, Marc. Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com

Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry