Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "xattr_array".
2023 Jan 10
3
[PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
...r.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
> static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array,
> void *fs_info)
> {
> + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info;
> const struct xattr *xattr;
> int err = 0;
>
> + if (si) {
> + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!si->v...
2023 Feb 21
0
[PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
...1c5fc7..55699c573541 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> > > @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
> > > static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array,
> > > void *fs_info)
> > > {
> > > + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info;
> > > const struct xattr *xattr;
> > > int err = 0;
> > >
> > > + if (si) {
> > > + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->va...
2023 Mar 14
1
[PATCH v8 1/6] reiserfs: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
...ity.c
index 41c0ea84fbf..6bffdf9a4fd 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c
@@ -39,6 +39,22 @@ static bool security_list(struct dentry *dentry)
return !IS_PRIVATE(d_inode(dentry));
}
+static int
+reiserfs_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array,
+ void *fs_info)
+{
+ struct reiserfs_security_handle *sec = fs_info;
+
+ sec->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!sec->value)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ sec->name = xattr_array->name;
+ sec->length = xattr_array->value_...
2023 Mar 14
2
[PATCH v8 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
...diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index 389308efe85..469ec45baee 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array,
void *fs_info)
{
+ struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info;
const struct xattr *xattr;
int err = 0;
+ if (si) {
+ si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!si->value)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ si->name = xattr...
2022 Dec 01
8
[PATCH v7 0/6] evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side
without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on
individual LSM decision.
Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to
support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the
ability to specify one
2023 Mar 14
7
[PATCH v8 0/6] evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side
without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on
individual LSM decision.
Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to
support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the
ability to specify one