Roberto Sassu
2023-Jan-10 08:55 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:41 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > security_inode_init_security(). > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs.Hi Mark, Joel, Joseph some time ago I sent this patch set to switch to the newer function security_inode_init_security(). Almost all the other parts of this patch set have been reviewed, and the patch set itself should be ready to be merged. I kindly ask if you could have a look at this patch and give your Reviewed-by, so that Paul could take the patch set. Thanks a lot! Roberto> As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case > of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. > just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by > LSMs. > > Supporting multiple xattrs is not currently supported where > security_old_inode_init_security() was called (mknod, symlink), as it > requires non-trivial changes that can be done at a later time. Like for > reiserfs, even if EVM is invoked, it will not provide an xattr (if it is > not the first to set it, its xattr will be discarded; if it is the first, > it does not have xattrs to calculate the HMAC on). > > Finally, modify the handling of the return value from > ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not > return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the > return value is not zero. > > However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still > taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero > without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. > > Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr > if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to > notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr > is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned > -EOPNOTSUPP). > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> > Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ > fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > int want_meta = 0; > int xattr_credits = 0; > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > + .name = NULL, > .enable = 1, > }; > int did_quota_inode = 0; > @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > /* get security xattr */ > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > if (status) { > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > - si.enable = 0; > - else { > - mlog_errno(status); > - goto leave; > - } > + mlog_errno(status); > + goto leave; > } > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ > @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > int want_clusters = 0; > int xattr_credits = 0; > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > + .name = NULL, > .enable = 1, > }; > int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; > @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > /* get security xattr */ > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > if (status) { > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > - si.enable = 0; > - else { > - mlog_errno(status); > - goto bail; > - } > + mlog_errno(status); > + goto bail; > } > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, > static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > void *fs_info) > { > + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; > const struct xattr *xattr; > int err = 0; > > + if (si) { > + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!si->value) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + si->name = xattr_array->name; > + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; > + return 0; > + } > + > for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { > err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > xattr->name, xattr->value, > @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, > const struct qstr *qstr, > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) > { > + int ret; > + > /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ > if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > - if (si) > - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > - &si->name, &si->value, > - &si->value_len); > + if (si) { > + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); > + /* > + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, > + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. > + */ > + if (!ret && !si->name) > + si->enable = 0; > + > + return ret; > + } > > return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL);
Paul Moore
2023-Jan-12 17:21 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:56 AM Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:41 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> > > > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > > security_inode_init_security(). > > > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. > > Hi Mark, Joel, Joseph > > some time ago I sent this patch set to switch to the newer > function security_inode_init_security(). Almost all the other parts of > this patch set have been reviewed, and the patch set itself should be > ready to be merged. > > I kindly ask if you could have a look at this patch and give your > Reviewed-by, so that Paul could take the patch set.I've been pushing to clean up some of the LSM interfaces to try and simplify things and remove as many special cases as possible, Roberto's work in this patchset is part of that. I would really appreciate it if the vfs/ocfs2 folks could give patch 2/6 a quick look to make sure you are okay with the changes. I realize that the various end-of-year holidays tend to slow things down a bit, but this patchset has been on the lists for over a month now; if I don't hear anything in the next week or two I'll assume you folks are okay with these patches ... -- paul-moore.com
Joseph Qi
2023-Feb-21 06:45 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. I don't have much background on this thread. It seems that we have to check EOPNOTSUPP since ocfs2_init_security_get() may return EOPNOTSUPP if it doesn't support extended attribute feature for backward compatibility. Other looks good. So with above comments addressed, you can add: Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at linux.alibaba.com> On 1/10/23 4:55 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:41 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: >> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> >> >> In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to >> security_inode_init_security(). >> >> Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the >> ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the >> name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. > > Hi Mark, Joel, Joseph > > some time ago I sent this patch set to switch to the newer > function security_inode_init_security(). Almost all the other parts of > this patch set have been reviewed, and the patch set itself should be > ready to be merged. > > I kindly ask if you could have a look at this patch and give your > Reviewed-by, so that Paul could take the patch set. > > Thanks a lot! > > Roberto > >> As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case >> of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. >> just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by >> LSMs. >> >> Supporting multiple xattrs is not currently supported where >> security_old_inode_init_security() was called (mknod, symlink), as it >> requires non-trivial changes that can be done at a later time. Like for >> reiserfs, even if EVM is invoked, it will not provide an xattr (if it is >> not the first to set it, its xattr will be discarded; if it is the first, >> it does not have xattrs to calculate the HMAC on). >> >> Finally, modify the handling of the return value from >> ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not >> return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the >> return value is not zero. >> >> However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still >> taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero >> without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. >> >> Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr >> if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to >> notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr >> is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned >> -EOPNOTSUPP). >> >> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> >> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> >> --- >> fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ >> fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c >> index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c >> @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, >> int want_meta = 0; >> int xattr_credits = 0; >> struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { >> + .name = NULL, >> .enable = 1, >> }; >> int did_quota_inode = 0; >> @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, >> /* get security xattr */ >> status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); >> if (status) { >> - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) >> - si.enable = 0; >> - else { >> - mlog_errno(status); >> - goto leave; >> - } >> + mlog_errno(status); >> + goto leave; >> } >> >> /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ >> @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, >> int want_clusters = 0; >> int xattr_credits = 0; >> struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { >> + .name = NULL, >> .enable = 1, >> }; >> int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; >> @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, >> /* get security xattr */ >> status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); >> if (status) { >> - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) >> - si.enable = 0; >> - else { >> - mlog_errno(status); >> - goto bail; >> - } >> + mlog_errno(status); >> + goto bail; >> } >> >> /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c >> index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c >> @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, >> static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, >> void *fs_info) >> { >> + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; >> const struct xattr *xattr; >> int err = 0; >> >> + if (si) { >> + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!si->value) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + si->name = xattr_array->name; >> + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; >> + return 0; >> + } >> + >> for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { >> err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, >> xattr->name, xattr->value, >> @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, >> const struct qstr *qstr, >> struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) >> { >> + int ret; >> + >> /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ >> if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) >> return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> - if (si) >> - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, >> - &si->name, &si->value, >> - &si->value_len); >> + if (si) { >> + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, >> + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); >> + /* >> + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, >> + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. >> + */ >> + if (!ret && !si->name) >> + si->enable = 0; >> + >> + return ret; >> + } >> >> return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, >> &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL);
Roberto Sassu
2023-Feb-21 07:51 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 14:45 +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:> Hi, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I don't have much background on this thread. It seems that we have to > check EOPNOTSUPP since ocfs2_init_security_get() may return EOPNOTSUPP > if it doesn't support extended attribute feature for backward > compatibility.Hi Joseph yes, I already reintroduced the check. Thanks for having a look. Roberto> Other looks good. So with above comments addressed, you can add: > Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at linux.alibaba.com> > > On 1/10/23 4:55 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:41 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> > > > > > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > > > security_inode_init_security(). > > > > > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > > > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > > > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. > > > > Hi Mark, Joel, Joseph > > > > some time ago I sent this patch set to switch to the newer > > function security_inode_init_security(). Almost all the other parts of > > this patch set have been reviewed, and the patch set itself should be > > ready to be merged. > > > > I kindly ask if you could have a look at this patch and give your > > Reviewed-by, so that Paul could take the patch set. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > Roberto > > > > > As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case > > > of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. > > > just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by > > > LSMs. > > > > > > Supporting multiple xattrs is not currently supported where > > > security_old_inode_init_security() was called (mknod, symlink), as it > > > requires non-trivial changes that can be done at a later time. Like for > > > reiserfs, even if EVM is invoked, it will not provide an xattr (if it is > > > not the first to set it, its xattr will be discarded; if it is the first, > > > it does not have xattrs to calculate the HMAC on). > > > > > > Finally, modify the handling of the return value from > > > ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the > > > return value is not zero. > > > > > > However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still > > > taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero > > > without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. > > > > > > Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr > > > if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to > > > notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr > > > is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned > > > -EOPNOTSUPP). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> > > > --- > > > fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ > > > fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > int want_meta = 0; > > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > > + .name = NULL, > > > .enable = 1, > > > }; > > > int did_quota_inode = 0; > > > @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > /* get security xattr */ > > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > > if (status) { > > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > - si.enable = 0; > > > - else { > > > - mlog_errno(status); > > > - goto leave; > > > - } > > > + mlog_errno(status); > > > + goto leave; > > > } > > > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ > > > @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > int want_clusters = 0; > > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > > + .name = NULL, > > > .enable = 1, > > > }; > > > int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; > > > @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > /* get security xattr */ > > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > > if (status) { > > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > - si.enable = 0; > > > - else { > > > - mlog_errno(status); > > > - goto bail; > > > - } > > > + mlog_errno(status); > > > + goto bail; > > > } > > > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ > > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, > > > static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > > > void *fs_info) > > > { > > > + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; > > > const struct xattr *xattr; > > > int err = 0; > > > > > > + if (si) { > > > + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!si->value) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + > > > + si->name = xattr_array->name; > > > + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > + > > > for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { > > > err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > > > xattr->name, xattr->value, > > > @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, > > > const struct qstr *qstr, > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) > > > { > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ > > > if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > - if (si) > > > - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > - &si->name, &si->value, > > > - &si->value_len); > > > + if (si) { > > > + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); > > > + /* > > > + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, > > > + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. > > > + */ > > > + if (!ret && !si->name) > > > + si->enable = 0; > > > + > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > > > > return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL);
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
- [PATCH v8 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
- [PATCH v8 1/6] reiserfs: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
- [PATCH v7 0/6] evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes
- [PATCH v8 0/6] evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes