Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "x86instrinfocpp".
2009 Jun 16
2
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
...requires<[IsIntelAsmWriter]>;
def SHL8mCLATT : I<0xD2, MRM4m, (outs), (ins i8mem :$dst),
"shl{b}\t{%cl, $dst|$dst, %CL}",
[(store (shl (loadi8 addr:$dst), CL),
addr:$dst)]>, requires<[IsATTAsmWriter]>;
I can get this two work with additional changes to X86InstrInfocpp but
the problem I have with this approach is that it introduces a lot of
duplication, when all I really want to do is parameterize the final
field in the string "shl{b}\t{%cl, $dst|$dst, %CL}". I was wondering
(hoping :-) if you knew of a better method to handling this?
[...]
__________...
2009 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Gaster,
Benedict<Benedict.Gaster at amd.com> wrote:
> I can get this two work with additional changes to X86InstrInfocpp but
> the problem I have with this approach is that it introduces a lot of
> duplication, when all I really want to do is parameterize the final
> field in the string "shl{b}\t{%cl, $dst|$dst, %CL}". I was wondering
> (hoping :-) if you knew of a better method to handling this...
2009 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Gaster,
Benedict<Benedict.Gaster at amd.com> wrote:
> I would like to use the LLVM x86 code generator to emit Intel syntax that is
> compatible with Microsoft’s MASM 9.x. Taking the TOT LLVM, from last week, I
> have found a number of changes that are required to make this work, most of
> which are straight forward but a couple I wanted to check
2009 Jun 16
5
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
...On Behalf Of Eli Friedman
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:10 AM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Gaster,
Benedict<Benedict.Gaster at amd.com> wrote:
> I can get this two work with additional changes to X86InstrInfocpp but
> the problem I have with this approach is that it introduces a lot of
> duplication, when all I really want to do is parameterize the final
> field in the string "shl{b}\t{%cl, $dst|$dst, %CL}". I was wondering
> (hoping :-) if you knew of a better method to handling this...
2009 Jun 16
3
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
I would like to use the LLVM x86 code generator to emit Intel syntax
that is compatible with Microsoft's MASM 9.x. Taking the TOT LLVM, from
last week, I have found a number of changes that are required to make
this work, most of which are straight forward but a couple I wanted to
check with the group to see what people thought was the best thing to
do. In particular, I have made all necessary