search for: x4150

Hello I am running opensuse 11 on a Sun x4150 32GB RAM 2 quad x86_64 E5450''s. It has a SAS PCI-Express LSI 3081E Host Bus Adapter (a rebranded Adaptec RAID 5805 it seems) running in a RAID 5 config. Xen in this setup is 3.2.1. The kernel is 2.6.25.18 The problem I have is that when I try to run a the xen kernel the RAID device is no...

If I use the Xvm pv guest console in ILOM GUI, I can''t detach it because I can''t press ctrl + ] Even when using the lock altgr key, when pressing ctrl this lock is silently disabled. Maybe some one could tell me how to press ctrl + AltGr + 9 in ILOM thx, florian

Hi, I just came across this box [0] (McKay Creek). Seems to be exceptional building material for ZFS based NAS/iSCSI unit. I especially liked the two extra system disks hidden inside the box ! Any one have an experience with these ? [0] http://www.intel.com/design/servers/storage/ssr212mc2 -- Regards, Cyril

Greetings, on this matter, Sunfire x4150 a 1U machine with 2xcpu sockets, "eight" drive bays, 64 GB expandability, 4 NIC packs quite a punch for its size. I don't think I've ever seen such power in such a small package Regards Rajagopal

...en space issue on a Windows 2003 32 bit xVM domU with 4GB RAM. He is able to successfully do these tests on equivalent physical system with Windows 2003 OS and 4GB RAM. Another user is facing issues with Tomcat running out of heap space on a Win2008 64bit xvM domU Our xVM hypervisor server is X4150 server with 64GB RAM with Solaris 11 snv_116. We would really appreciate if someone could suggest a solution to fix this Out of memory/ heap issues on xvM domu. Thanks, -Param Here is the exact error user gets: *HTTP Status 500 -* -----------------------------------------------------------...

Hi, I''m running snv_89 on an X4150 with a CentOS-5 guest. I cannot seem to get my second network interface to work properly. I followed the virt-install instructions, and even saw the FAQ entry about adding a second network instance in the XML config. I see my second device in the guest but it''s either connected to the w...

apparently if you don''t order a J4200 with drives, you just get filler sleds that won''t accept a hard drive. (had to look at a parts breakdown on sunsolve to figure this out -- the docs should simply make this clear.) it looks like the sled that will accept a drive is part #570-1182. anyone know how i could order 12 of these?

To improve the performance of scripts that manipulate zfs snapshots and the zfs snapshot service in perticular there needs to be a way to list all the snapshots for a given object and only the snapshots for that object. There are two RFEs filed that cover this: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6352014 : ''zfs list'' should have an option to only present direct

...firmware for the > SAS card from LSI''s web site - v1.29.00 without any changes, server still > locks. > > Any ideas, suggestions how to fix or workaround this issue? The adapter is > suppose to be enterprise-class. We have three of these HBA''s, used as follows: X4150, J4400, Solaris-10U7-x86, mpt patch 141737-01 V245, J4200, Solaris-10U7, mpt patch 141736-05 X4170, J4400, Solaris-10U8-x86, mpt/kernel patch 141445-09 None of these systems are suffering the issues you describe. All of their SAS HBA''s are running the latest Sun-supported firmware I co...

Hi everyone! I''m planning to migrate a little firm''s Windows server to a HVM machine. The test setup woks fine (it''s basically an MSSQL server tied pack of programs for an accountancy office), all programs can reach the mssql from the outside on the hvm windows. If fact it turned out to be so good, that I''m even planning to simply copy the win image(s) to the

Anyone know of a SATA and/or SAS HBA with battery backed write cache? Seems like using a full-blown RAID controller and exporting each individual drive back to ZFS as a single LUN is a waste of power and $$$. Looking for any thoughts or ideas. Thanks. -Matt -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

HI, T5220, S10U4 + patches mdb -k > ::memstat While above is working (takes some time, ideally ::memstat -n 4 to use 4 threads could be useful) mpstat 1 shows: CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt idl 48 0 0 1922112 9 0 0 8 0 0 0 15254 6 94 0 0 So about 2mln xcalls per second. Let''s check with dtrace:

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1986 Summary: ''zfs destroy'' hangs on encrypted dataset Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other

...r NFS for large movie files (need large capacity to hold all of them). Are there any rules of thumb on how much RAM is needed to handle this (probably RAIDZ for all the disks) with zfs, and how large a server should be used? The throughput required is not so large, so I am thinking an X4100 M2 or X4150 should be plenty. This message posted from opensolaris.org

I''m new so opensolaris and very new to ZFS. In the past we have always used linux for our database backends. So now we are looking for a new database server to give us a big performance boost, and also the possibility for scalability. Our current database consists mainly of a huge table containing about 230 million records and a few (relatively) smaller tables (something like 13 million

The standard controller that has been recommended in the past is the AOC-SAT2-MV8 - an 8 port with a marvel chipset. There have been several mentions of LSI based controllers on the mailing lists and I''m wondering about them. One obvious difference is that the Marvel contoller is PCI-X and the LSI controllers are PCI-E. Supermicro have several LSI controllers. AOC-USASLP-L8i with the

Hey folks, I guess this is an odd question to be asking here, but I could do with some feedback from anybody who''s actually using ZFS in anger. I''m about to go live with ZFS in our company on a new fileserver, but I have some real concerns about whether I can really trust ZFS to keep my data alive if things go wrong. This is a big step for us, we''re a 100% windows