search for: x10sys

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 641 matches for "x10sys".

2004 Nov 12
4
[LLVMdev] install-bytecode no longer works
...out the include, of course, but the problem then becomes that the tests will then fail on other Unix platforms. Some way is needed to make the tests platform-independent. As a workaround for now I guess I can add an empty alloca.h file. On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:43:12 -0800 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > The default prefix is /usr/local but I would recommend that when you > configure LLVm you do so with: > > configure --prefix=/me/llvm/install/dir ... > > so that installation occurs in a place you have write access. If you > feel strongly about restoring the...
2004 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] install-bytecode no longer works
Wow... it is nearly twice as fast. But it tried to install stuff in /usr/local (and as I wasn't root...) and it didn't do that before. As I don't care about profiling or tracing, I didn't bother to su and do it again. On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:45:35 -0800 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > The entire makefile system was rewritten a couple of weeks ago. This is > a good thing, your compiles now go twice as fast. Resistance is futile, > just adapt :) > > The install target installed the bytecode libs into CFEINSTALL as before > and also installs the...
2004 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] install-bytecode no longer works
...t the problem then becomes that the tests will > then fail on other Unix platforms. Some way is needed to make the tests > platform-independent. As a workaround for now I guess I can add an > empty alloca.h file. > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:43:12 -0800 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > The default prefix is /usr/local but I would recommend that when you > > configure LLVm you do so with: > > > > configure --prefix=/me/llvm/install/dir ... > > > > so that installation occurs in a place you have write access. If you &gt...
2004 Aug 29
5
[LLVMdev] Optimization opportunity
...m to have it or any way of building it. There's no rush to commit this. If you don't feel comfortable doing so, it can wait until Chris gets back. And as it's my first submission, you shouldn't feel comfortable :) Jeff On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:20:57 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Jeff, > > Chris isn't likely to respond to this for a while as he's on vacation. > I'll take a look at it and will commit it if it looks good. Since code > gen isn't my specialty, could you increase my comfort level a little by > giving me some...
2004 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] install-bytecode no longer works
...s fast. But it tried to install stuff in > /usr/local (and as I wasn't root...) and it didn't do that before. As I > don't care about profiling or tracing, I didn't bother to su and do it > again. > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:45:35 -0800 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > The entire makefile system was rewritten a couple of weeks ago. This is > > a good thing, your compiles now go twice as fast. Resistance is futile, > > just adapt :) > > > > The install target installed the bytecode libs into CFEINSTALL as bef...
2004 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] install-bytecode no longer works
But there already was an "install", and it did far more than install the bytecode files. That changed too? On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:28:27 -0800 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Yeah, its just "install" now. > > I'll fix the documentation. > > Reid. > > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:19, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > My rebuild from scratch has hit this snag. The instructions still call > > for running "gmake -C r...
2004 Sep 24
4
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
...Add it for now. If it is impossible to build with VC7.1 and without > STLPort, then there really isn't a choice. I have to research the issue > myself to see if it's possible to avoid using STLPort. > > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:42:51 -0700 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > Someone needs to adjudicate on whether I add the #include of <cstdio> or > > not. I can't test this so, Paolo/Henrik/Jeff, please let me know if I > > need to add it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Reid. > > > > On...
2004 Dec 29
3
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > But it seems that there are no asterisks at > * http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ That's because there was a build error (see the big red notice). Check out http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/2004-12-27.html > By the way, is it possible to send a relevant announce to > * gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.announce That's the announcement...
2004 Dec 29
2
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > issues figured out. How can I know of that? Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Wait until most of the asterisks in the test results go away. :) The tester runs nightly, so checking every few
2004 Dec 29
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
...//llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > > Wait until most of the asterisks in the test results go away. :) > The tester runs nightly, so checking every few days shouldn't hurt. [snip] Thanks. But it seems that there are no asterisks at * http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ By the way, is it possible to send a relevant announce to * gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.announce * gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/us...
2005 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev]Linker error building (modified) lli
Where do I add that line? Just putting it in the vanilla Makefile in tools/lli doesn't work. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reid Spencer" <reid at x10sys.com> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:50 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]Linker error building (modified) lli > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.e...
2004 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
OK. I strongly support that sentiment. Paolo, could you send me your procedure for building under Windows? I haven't tried to build anything but System/Win32 so far. On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:52:23 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > I'll wait for the research. We should try, as much as possible, to make > it work with just what the compiler provides and without third party > packages. > > Thanks, > > reid. > > On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 07:46, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > I added...
2004 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] install-bytecode no longer works
...lib directory. This is intentional. Reid On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:32, Jeff Cohen wrote: > But there already was an "install", and it did far more than install the > bytecode files. That changed too? > > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:28:27 -0800 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, its just "install" now. > > > > I'll fix the documentation. > > > > Reid. > > > > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:19, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > My rebuild from scratch has hit this snag. The instructions stil...
2005 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] Making a pass available to llc?
On 7/25/05, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > I think that the answer is that llc is intended to be the final compiler > of executable output. Running "general" passes in llc was never part of > the design. It just runs machine passes, assuming that its bytecode > input is already optimized. OK, that ma...
2004 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Files to lib/System/Win32
...ing standards issues. Reid. On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 22:18, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Patch for Signals.cpp attached. > > On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:30:12 -0700 > Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 12:30:41 -0700 > > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > > > Patch looks good so I committed it. I'd be interested in knowing what > > > your test results are once you start testing with the Win32 port. > > > > I tested Signals.cpp and verified that the CTRL/C handler works, as does > >...
2004 May 11
1
[LLVMdev] ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp
...> > return (FILE*)Ptr; > > } > > > _______________________ > Reid Spencer > President & CTO > eXtensible Systems, Inc. rspencer at x10sys.com _______________________ Reid Spencer President & CTO eXtensible Systems, Inc. rspencer at x10sys.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message p...
2006 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
On 6/3/06, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've > tried and failed. I have :-) There was some patches, but I believe that they were all merged in the latest snapshot. Rafael
2004 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM Visual Studio Project files
...roblem if nothing else will... once I figure out how bison locates m4... but not tonight. On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:03:28 -0800 Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > I'll try and verify it later tonight. > > On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:18:51 -0800 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > The Visual Studio project files that Morten Ofstad provided have been committed > > to CVS in the win32 directory. I would appreciate it if Morten and at least one > > other win32 developer could verify that the files work correctly as committed. > &g...
2004 May 11
0
[LLVMdev] ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp
...return stderr; > } > > return (FILE*)Ptr; > } _______________________ Reid Spencer President & CTO eXtensible Systems, Inc. rspencer at x10sys.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040511/35056102/attachment.sig>
2004 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Files to lib/System/Win32
...I fixed that, but creating a file to serialize concurrent programs is a Unix paradigm that is not appropriate for all platforms. On Windows the preferred way is to use a mutex, which cleans up after itself if a program dies abnormally. On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:38:25 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Patch committed. Thanks for cleaning up some of the coding standards > issues. > > Reid. > > On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 22:18, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > Patch for Signals.cpp attached. > > > > On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:30:12 -0700 > > Jeff Cohen &l...