search for: wringer

...series will be under $USD 15 in mass-volume: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4213637/Xilinx-provides-first-product-details-for-EPP-ARM-based-devices so - does that change things at all? :) i assumed that it would be possible to push other sections of the gallium3d code through the LLVM wringer (so to speak). not just the shader program. i've seen papers for example - someone won 3rd prize from a competition by xilinx, he was a Seoul University student, managed to implement parts of OpenGL ES 1.1 in an FPGA, by porting MesaGL to it. got fair performance, too. i always wondered wha...

...o trade-off between FPGA and the ARM core, but the ARM is only running at 800MHz. Maybe it's possible to get competitive performance, but it doesn't sound like a promising start. > i assumed that it would be possible to push other sections of the > gallium3d code through the LLVM wringer (so to speak). not just the > shader program. i've seen papers for example - someone won 3rd prize > from a competition by xilinx, he was a Seoul University student, > managed to implement parts of OpenGL ES 1.1 in an FPGA, by porting > MesaGL to it. got fair performance, too. i...

...it ELF file even though all the object files are 64 bit ELF formats I have gcc v3.4.2 from Sun Freeware and have noticed that is was compiled using the 32 bit ld (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) and am going to try to re-compile gcc using the 64 bit ld (/usr/ccs/bin/sparcv9/ld) If anyone has been through this wringer, I'd appreciate a place to look to get going again, and maybe some pointers of what I'm missing in this process. pertinent environment varibles: gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/specs Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --with-ld=...

...9;t worry - if this is your first foray into the wacky world of PRI then you're just getting the obligatory baptism by fire. I've set up dozens of PRI's here in the states and at first it always took hours, even for an experienced PBX technician. But now that I've been through the wringer I know which questions to ask and what tinkering to do. Please don't give up - PRI is pretty nice once you getting it working. If you have any questions about talking to your carrier, please contact me offline. I'll be happy to help! -MC

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > i was just writing this: > http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/ > > when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would > greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible. > > put these together: >

> No matter what, once you push your branch and make it public, anyone > could pull it and then rewriting history gets trickier. IME it's best > to avoid doing that as much as possible. If we have automation that looks at public topic branches (possibly because of a github pull request), then people will start making branches public sooner rather than later. That's when we

i was just writing this: http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/ when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible. put these together: http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/epp/zynq-7000/index.htm

Hi Dave, I installed it one month ago and was very surprised by the sound quality. The stream seemed to sound better in Quintessential than in Winamp. MAX -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Dave St John Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:11 PM To: icecast@xiph.org Subject: Re: [icecast] winamp 5 release Anyone have extensive