search for: worsed

Hi guys I've got an easy question but couldn't find any quick solution. I woulk like to change the following matrix good bad worse Blue 1 2 2 Yellow 2 1 3 Black 3 4 4 Into the following structure good 1 Blue Bad 2 Blue Worse 2 Blue Good 2 Yellow Bad 1 Yellow Worse 2 Yellow Good 2 Black Bad 4 Black Worse 4 Black Thanks a lot. Regards Beat Huggler --- Beat Huggler Quantitative

I have been using Sixtel from the beginning of the year and service was getting worse and worse. Yesterday I tried to access the website to get the CDR and I got an error saying that the domain no longer exists. I checked the whois and it says that the domain is on hold. Have they finally folded? -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnolog?a Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Tel:

The Icecast problems I mentioned yesterday on our new server are getting worse. This time the server only stayed up for about 30 minutes before dying (no more music - process is still running). Obviously this won't fly. Again, ices reports: Error during send: Libshout reported send error, disconnecting: Libshout socket error That's when everything stops. What can we do? Thanks,

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20100908/043c0394/attachment.pl>

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Achim Gottinger wrote: > Am 03.10.2016 um 18:57 schrieb Rob via samba: >> [...] >> >> This generally works fine... user mappings are like: >> >> $ wbinfo -i auser >> auser:*:10028:10000:User Name:/home/auser:/bin/bash >> $ id auser >> uid=10028(auser) gid=10000(agroup) groups=10000(agroup),10007(othergroup) >>

On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Josh Coalson wrote: > well, I took a look at the files. from my > knowledge of shorten there are two things it does > that flac doesn't do: > > BUT, you have stumbled on some recordings where the > LSB is 0 for much of the file. as a matter of fact, > in > the worse track (track 6) almost the entire signal in > both channels is like that.

Do you know if this problem exists in Icecast2? Is it even worth fixing in the 1.x codebase? Are we the first people to see the bug? Hunter > From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:51:34 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > Directory updates happen asyncronously in a

Worse now: I get stuff such as http://paste.debian.net/44248 in my log. What is dovecot trying to do and why? Kris -- Kristian =?iso-8859-15?q?K=F6hntopp?= <kris at xn--khntopp-90a.de>

well, I took a look at the files. from my knowledge of shorten there are two things it does that flac doesn't do: 1. it estimates the mean of the signal for each block, subtracts it out and stores it separately. but this is pretty useless for the predictors that shorten uses as they are pretty insensitive to the mean (try different values of -m from 0 to whatever and note practically no

Soon, Firefox 3.1 and other browsers will start to support vorbis and users will increase vorbis use on the net. Most users (as most Linux distributions) are however using the reference xiph.org vorbis library which generate worse files than the aoTuV library from http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ . According to latest discussion: https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1251 the aoTuV code should have

FYI, since turning off directory updates, the streams have been up 18 hours. So, if that does turn out to be the issue, is there anything that can be done to "fix" that? Is it a known bug? > From: Brendan Cully <brendan@icecast.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:06:31 -0400 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems

Hi all, I was excited to see the announcement on the list regarding the fix for the echo problems on Digium FXO cards! I have 2 X101P's, TDM400P with 4 FXS modules and couple of XLite softphones. A few months back,I had gone thru the recommendation on the list to remove echo from the SIP phones(I never did have any echo on the TDM400P FXS phones), and had removed about 90% of the echo.

See below... > From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:27:06 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > Hunter, > > You can look in ices/src/libshout/configure.in at the top I think. libshout 1.0.6 > > Icecast doesn't have SMP issues that I know of, as we

Okay. It died again after about 4 hours. I will turn off the yp servers and see if that helps. Any other ideas? Same thing, BTW, ices reported a libshout error. Hunter > From: Brendan Cully <brendan@icecast.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:56:58 -0400 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > I

On 10/28/18 17:54, Zube wrote: > On Sun Oct 28 10:20:31 PM, Alain p?an wrote: > >> Le 28/10/2018 ? 22:10, Albert McCann a ?crit?: >>> Damn, this is bad enough to make one weep. >> >> Red Hat would stay as a distinct entity inside IBM. IBM has also >> contributed to Free software, and especially Linux kernel. >> I don't know how bad it is and the

I'm using whatever comes with Icecast 1.3.11 and Ices 0.22. Just grabbed both tarballs from Icecast.org. Is there a way to find out the libshout version? I can't really tell from the Ices source... Hunter > From: tim <tim@nvhs.nl> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:57:07 +0200 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems

I am analyzing a clang 10.0.0 vs gcc 7.3 performance difference that I can reproduce in the following test. unsigned foo(unsigned t1, unsigned t2, int count, int step) { unsigned tmp = 0; int state = 0; for (int i = 0 ; i < count ; i += step) { state++; if (state > 5) state = 0; if (state == 3) tmp += t2; } return tmp; }

I've made a change to llvm-objdump and feel uncomfortable checking it in without a test case. Where do the "make check" tests for tools like llvm-objdump go? Worse comes to worse, I'll stick it in test/MC/Mips since it is there I need the change for other Mips/MC tests. Thanks, Jack -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

2015-08-16 22:10 GMT-07:00 David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com>: > > > I would argue that a fix in the wrong direction is worse than the status > quo. > How is proposed change worse than status quo ? > > >> >> The argument that target are relying on InstCombine to mitigate IR >> requiring legalization seems dubious to me. First, because both

Kernel 3.1-rc8 btrfs-progs-0.19 mount options: noatime,autodefrag (space_cache is enabled) There are snapshots present on the filesystem. When I do a btrfs fi defrag on a file, the file becomes much more fragmented. The end result can be a file with 20k times more fragments than before. Initially I thought the extents were just smaller but were next to each other, so I checked with both