> libshout 1.0.6That's fine.. there were no streaming changes to libshout sincie 0.3 or so i think. Mostly just fixes in protocol or in icy compatibility mode.> It's a FastEthernet LAN. All ports are full duplex running through a > Catalyst 2900. Both Icecast and Ices are running on the same machine. No > errors on the ports, etc...We used 2900s as well, and they are horrid at autodetection. Be sure to set that stuff manually and make sure to get it right on both ends. Note: since you're running ices and icecase on the same box, this probably isn't the issue.> Nope, Ices 0.1 does the same thing.What about running ices 0.2.2 on a different host? Does the same problem exist? jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Haven't tried this... Right now, that's the only box we have in the co-lo...> From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:43:53 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > > What about running ices 0.2.2 on a different host? Does the same > problem exist? >--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Thanks for the suggestions. I put ices in verbose mode. So far it's been up for almost 2 hours. If it dies again hopefully ices will give some more feedback. Hunter> From: Brendan Cully <brendan@icecast.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:56:58 -0400 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > I believe you are using some yp servers. Try turning them off and see if > you get more stability. A last resort (strictly for debugging purposes, > of course :) is to run ices against shoutcast on an otherwise identical > setup. That should help in determining whether the bug is in icecast, > your network, or ices.--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
See below...> From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:27:06 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > Hunter, > > You can look in ices/src/libshout/configure.in at the top I think.libshout 1.0.6> > Icecast doesn't have SMP issues that I know of, as we ran it on SMP > systems for a long time. So let's go through all the obvious things: > > What kind of LAN is this on? Has it been recently reconfigured > (possible problem: duplexes might not be consistent, etc)It's a FastEthernet LAN. All ports are full duplex running through a Catalyst 2900. Both Icecast and Ices are running on the same machine. No errors on the ports, etc...> > Does icecast 0.1 behave differently? (possible problem: bug in ices > 0.2.2)Nope, Ices 0.1 does the same thing.> > Let's try and narrow the scope a bit.Great. Let me know what other info you need.> > jack.--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
On Monday, 27 August 2001 at 09:36, Hunter Hillegas wrote:> > Does icecast 0.1 behave differently? (possible problem: bug in ices > > 0.2.2) > > Nope, Ices 0.1 does the same thing. > > > > > Let's try and narrow the scope a bit. > > Great. Let me know what other info you need.I believe you are using some yp servers. Try turning them off and see if you get more stability. A last resort (strictly for debugging purposes, of course :) is to run ices against shoutcast on an otherwise identical setup. That should help in determining whether the bug is in icecast, your network, or ices. -Brendan --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Okay. It died again after about 4 hours. I will turn off the yp servers and see if that helps. Any other ideas? Same thing, BTW, ices reported a libshout error. Hunter> From: Brendan Cully <brendan@icecast.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:56:58 -0400 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > I believe you are using some yp servers. Try turning them off and see if > you get more stability. A last resort (strictly for debugging purposes, > of course :) is to run ices against shoutcast on an otherwise identical > setup. That should help in determining whether the bug is in icecast, > your network, or ices. > > -Brendan--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.