Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "workbase".
Did you mean:
workable
2017 Oct 16
4
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...gt; so the original 'cli' was replaced with the pv call but to me the offset
>>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
>> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
>> perfectly legitimate.
> Yes, but
>
> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
> ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
> ostr at workbase>
>
> so pv_irq_ops.irq_disable is about 5MB ahead of where we are n...
2017 Oct 16
4
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...gt; so the original 'cli' was replaced with the pv call but to me the offset
>>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
>> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
>> perfectly legitimate.
> Yes, but
>
> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
> ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
> ostr at workbase>
>
> so pv_irq_ops.irq_disable is about 5MB ahead of where we are n...
2017 Oct 17
1
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...39; was replaced with the pv call but to me the offset
> >>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
> >> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
> >> perfectly legitimate.
> > Yes, but
> >
> > ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> > ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> > ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
> > ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
> > ostr at workbase>
> >
> > so pv_irq_ops.irq_disable is abo...
2017 Oct 12
2
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
On 12/10/17 20:11, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 10:32 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:35:03PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Paravirt alternatives are applied much earlier than normal alternatives.
>>>> + * They are only applied when running on a hypervisor.
2017 Oct 12
2
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
On 12/10/17 20:11, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 10:32 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:35:03PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Paravirt alternatives are applied much earlier than normal alternatives.
>>>> + * They are only applied when running on a hypervisor.
2017 Oct 17
0
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...;cli' was replaced with the pv call but to me the offset
>>>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
>>> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
>>> perfectly legitimate.
>> Yes, but
>>
>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
>> ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
>> ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
>> ostr at workbase>
>>
>> so pv_irq_ops.irq_disable is about 5MB...
2017 Oct 17
0
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...ith the pv call but to me the offset
>>>>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
>>>> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
>>>> perfectly legitimate.
>>> Yes, but
>>>
>>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
>>> ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
>>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
>>> ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
>>> ostr at workbase>
>>>
>>> so pv_irq_ops....
2017 Oct 12
0
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...l
>>
>>
>> so the original 'cli' was replaced with the pv call but to me the offset
>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
> perfectly legitimate.
Yes, but
ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
ostr at workbase>
so pv_irq_ops.irq_disable is about 5MB ahead of where we are now. (I
didn't mean that x...
2017 Oct 17
2
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...offset
> >>>>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
> >>>> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
> >>>> perfectly legitimate.
> >>> Yes, but
> >>>
> >>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> >>> ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> >>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
> >>> ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
> >>> ostr at workbase>
> >>>
&g...
2017 Oct 17
2
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...offset
> >>>>> looks a bit off, no? Shouldn't it always be positive?
> >>>> callq takes a 32bit signed displacement, so jumping back by up to 2G is
> >>>> perfectly legitimate.
> >>> Yes, but
> >>>
> >>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> >>> ffffffff817365dd t entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> >>> ostr at workbase> nm vmlinux | grep " pv_irq_ops"
> >>> ffffffff81c2dbc0 D pv_irq_ops
> >>> ostr at workbase>
> >>>
&g...