search for: wkennington

Still not working with gcc5.2 rc On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 11:08 William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> wrote: > Trying 5.2-rc now, will report back after the test case is run. > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 07:23 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: >> > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I b...

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > >> If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing >> for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration >> variable after name resolution becomes possible. >> >> I think tincd should

William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> writes: > Agreed. > On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > >> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it make sense >> to call res_init() every time tinc retries a metaconnection? It's not >&...

If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration variable after name resolution becomes possible. I think tincd should succeed in resolving domain names after name resolution becomes available.

On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 > changes. I'm not an expert on the gcc package, but looking at the changelog it appears to be be following the upstream 5.x branch: * Thu Jun 18 2015 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com> 5.1.1-4 - update from the 5 branch - fix C++ ICE in

I applied the patch Gene wrote here: https://github.com/triton/nixpkgs/commit/06e146b2ce5eaaa54ebea061dd5797f89ae2c37c The tree after that commit is entirely based on gcc5. In order to do a test with gcc4.9, I reverted: https://github.com/triton/nixpkgs/commit/8ccc1f121f379f4d66ce0a66f581c49d25fb4e15#diff-d7222640d82ff920625e9311d05a0137 and then built two images, one entirely based on gcc4.9

Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 changes. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:02 PM Adam Williamson via Syslinux < syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 05:06 +0300, Ady wrote: > > @Adam, > > > > Any news / results after applying Genec's proposed patch? > > > >

Trying 5.2-rc now, will report back after the test case is run. On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 07:23 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: > > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 > > changes. > > I'm not an expert on the gcc package, but looking at the changelog it >

+1 I was noticing the same thing and currently solved it using dnsmasq. On Feb 1, 2015 1:48 AM, "crocket" <crockabiscuit at gmail.com> wrote: > If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration > variable after name resolution becomes possible. > > I think tincd should succeed in

Agreed. On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > > > >> If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > >> for ever to resolve domain names in

Currently, the tinc application which is part of tinc 1.1 does not support the ability to handle `Name = $HOST` lines in tinc.conf. This set of patches refactors get_name in order to be able to support this configuration option in the tinc binary. After having read through the codebase, it seems like we could really do for a heavy refactoring as there is a lot of poorly coupled and duplicated