search for: kennington

Still not working with gcc5.2 rc On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 11:08 William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> wrote: > Trying 5.2-rc now, will report back after the test case is run. > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 07:23 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: >> > Does fe...

On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 > changes. I'm not an expert on the gcc package, but looking at the changelog it appears to be be following the upstream 5.x branch: * Thu Jun 18 2015 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com> 5.1.1-4 - updat...

I applied the patch Gene wrote here: https://github.com/triton/nixpkgs/commit/06e146b2ce5eaaa54ebea061dd5797f89ae2c37c The tree after that commit is entirely based on gcc5. In order to do a test with gcc4.9, I reverted: https://github.com/triton/nixpkgs/commit/8ccc1f121f379f4d66ce0a66f581c49d25fb4e15#diff-d7222640d82ff920625e9311d05a0137 and then built two images, one entirely based on gcc4.9

William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> writes: > Agreed. > On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > >> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it make sense >> to call res_init() every time tinc retries a metacon...

If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration variable after name resolution becomes possible. I think tincd should succeed in resolving domain names after name resolution becomes available.

...t of printed Subnets, MAC and IPv6 addresses. * Added a "--batch" option to force the tinc CLI to run in non-interactive mode. * Improve default Device selection on *BSD and Mac OS X. * Allow running tinc without RSA keys. Thanks to Etienne Dechamps, Sven-Haegar Koch, William A. Kennington III, Baptiste Jonglez, Alexis Hildebrandt, Armin Fisslthaler, Franz Pletz, Alexander Ried and Saverio Proto for their contributions to this version of tinc. Please note that although tinc 1.1pre11 is backwards compatible with tinc 1.0.x, it is NOT compatible with tinc 1.1pre1 through 1.1pre10. --...

...t of printed Subnets, MAC and IPv6 addresses. * Added a "--batch" option to force the tinc CLI to run in non-interactive mode. * Improve default Device selection on *BSD and Mac OS X. * Allow running tinc without RSA keys. Thanks to Etienne Dechamps, Sven-Haegar Koch, William A. Kennington III, Baptiste Jonglez, Alexis Hildebrandt, Armin Fisslthaler, Franz Pletz, Alexander Ried and Saverio Proto for their contributions to this version of tinc. Please note that although tinc 1.1pre11 is backwards compatible with tinc 1.0.x, it is NOT compatible with tinc 1.1pre1 through 1.1pre10. --...

On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 05:06 +0300, Ady wrote: > @Adam, > > Any news / results after applying Genec's proposed patch? > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-July/023727.html?; > > TIA, > Ady Sorry for the delay - I built a Fedora live image with that patch applied and it did boot OK. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter:

Trying 5.2-rc now, will report back after the test case is run. On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 07:23 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: > > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 > > changes. > > I'm not an expert on the gcc package, but looking at the changelog it > appears to be be following the upstream 5.x branch: > > * Thu Jun 18 2015 Jakub Jelinek <jakub...

...roken. > > > BIOS in question is the SeaBIOS > http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios Good to note though it's not strictly that BIOS from what I've seen. On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:57 PM, William Kennington via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> Still not working with gcc5.2 rc > > core/fs/diskio_bios.c:395 contains pm_fs_init() which I believe is the > first protected-mode code. > > void pm_fs_init(com32sys_t *regs) > { > static struct bios_disk_priva...

...n names after name > resolution becomes available. The problem is when /etc/resolv.conf is changed while a program is running, glibc doesn't automatically notice this. Since tinc 1.0.25 and 1.1pre11, if you send tincd the ALRM signal, it will force glibc to reload /etc/resolv.conf. William Kennington mentioned running dnsmasq. This works around the problem because in that case, /etc/resolv.conf always points to localhost. I myself do something similar, but with Unbound. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> -------------- next part -----...

Am 02.02.2015 um 19:32 schrieb Nicol?s Reynolds: > William Kennington <william-5Om/gJxqp8Dx9BLsLxWUfA at public.gmane.org> writes: > >> Agreed. >> On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne-ypMCQUleWbRvynnTyRI/EA at public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it...

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:50 AM, poma via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > - "unsigned char c;" does not solve the problem > > - "c >= 0 && c <= ' '" solves the problem for the current git Could you try the following patch? Feel free to only apply the change to readconfig.c if you want. -- -Gene diff --git

Currently, the tinc application which is part of tinc 1.1 does not support the ability to handle `Name = $HOST` lines in tinc.conf. This set of patches refactors get_name in order to be able to support this configuration option in the tinc binary. After having read through the codebase, it seems like we could really do for a heavy refactoring as there is a lot of poorly coupled and duplicated

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > >> If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing >> for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration >> variable after name resolution becomes possible. >> >> I think tincd should

On 14.07.2015 01:31, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:24 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 13.07.2015 18:48, Gene Cumm wrote: > >>> It stops after printing the access type "ETCD" and before printing the >>> remainder of the banner. I presume this is not a hybridized image? >>> >> >> >> I

...stion is the SeaBIOS >> http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios > > Good to note though it's not strictly that BIOS from what I've seen. > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:57 PM, William Kennington via Syslinux >> <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >>> Still not working with gcc5.2 rc >> >> core/fs/diskio_bios.c:395 contains pm_fs_init() which I believe is the >> first protected-mode code. >> >> void pm_fs_init(com32sys_t *regs) >> { >&g...

> On Jul 10, 2015 5:29 PM, "poma via Syslinux" <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > The same as with the ISOLINUX, stable and git. > > Only this time has nothing to do with the menu. > > 1) EXTLINUX is no longer a discrete variant. The installer extlinux now > installs SYSLINUX. > 2) William Kensington already saw a similar behavior wherein an

Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 changes. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:02 PM Adam Williamson via Syslinux < syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 05:06 +0300, Ady wrote: > > @Adam, > > > > Any news / results after applying Genec's proposed patch? > > > >

+1 I was noticing the same thing and currently solved it using dnsmasq. On Feb 1, 2015 1:48 AM, "crocket" <crockabiscuit at gmail.com> wrote: > If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration > variable after name resolution becomes possible. > > I think tincd should succeed in